Explore publications.

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into higher education is fundamentally reshaping how students access and present knowledge. Within legal education particularly, AI tools increasingly enable students to generate summaries, conduct research, draft legal content and retrieve information with minimal engagement in traditional legal reasoning processes. At the same time, South African law faculties remain tasked with cultivating industry ready candidate legal practitioners who possess critical thinking abilities, ethical judgment, persuasive communication skills as well as strong legal research competencies. This creates an important pedagogical tension. While AI may enhance efficiency and technological fluency, its uncritical use may simultaneously undermine the intellectual rigour required for competent legal practice. This paper critically examines whether the growing integration of AI in legal education supports or compromises the cultivation of graduate attributes required within the South African legal profession. Using a doctrinal and conceptual methodology, the study analyses the graduate competency frameworks advanced by the Council on Higher Education and the South African Qualifications Authority. It further interrogates whether AI tools meaningfully contribute toward the development of legal reasoning, ethical sensitivity, drafting proficiency and contextual interpretation, all of which remain central to professional legal readiness. The paper argues that although AI presents significant opportunities for enhancing legal research efficiency and technological competence, overreliance on these tools risks producing graduates who are technologically capable yet jurisprudentially underdeveloped. It contends that AI cannot replace the human processes of critical engagement, ethical reflection and contextual legal interpretation that define legal education within a constitutional democracy. The study concludes that responsible AI integration in legal education requires careful pedagogical design and ethical oversight to ensure that innovation does not come at the expense of professional competence and intellectual integrity.

Higher education institutions face both opportunities and risks when adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI), offering possibilities for educational progress while simultaneously deepening existing social inequalities. With the rapid adoption of AI in the legal profession, there is a growing need to reimagine legal pedagogy. Within the scholarship of teaching and learning, the pedagogical and ethical aspects of AI in education have received extensive global research, yet South African legal pedagogy has received limited study as far as its transformative potential is concerned, despite its ongoing social inequalities. The study examines AI-mediated learning environments through person–environment theory as well as Freire’s critical/postcolonial pedagogy in exploring their impact AI may have on students' legal reasoning abilities, research skills, and access to knowledge. The study employs qualitative document analysis of South African higher education policy documents alongside international AI-based legal education platforms. Preliminary analysis suggests that AI has the potential to enhance legal reasoning and research efficiency, yet also risks maintaining epistemic exclusion and the digital divide unless structural inequalities are addressed. The research adds to teaching and learning scholarship by proposing a justice-oriented framework that unites theoretical and practical approaches to integrate AI into South African legal education, thereby promoting socially just transformation. The research proposes inclusive curriculum design, critical digital literacy training, and context-sensitive pedagogical approaches. Situated within a Global South perspective, the study thus offers one of the first to combine theoretical insights and practical recommendations for using AI to challenge entrenched inequalities and promote socially just legal education transformation.

This paper aims to explore the transformative potential of replacing traditional dissertations with community-based projects for law students. It examines how these projects empower both communities and students by addressing key challenges, such as the need for work experience among new graduates and the development of essential skills for the next centuries such as project management, entrepreneurship, problem solving and critical thinking. These skills are crucial for diverse career paths, including roles in non-governmental organizations, academia, management, public service, and entrepreneurship. This study drew on an interdisciplinary approach within a Master's in Law Social Justice program offered by the University of Cape Town. The student utilized non-traditional research methods in law, including job shadowing, interviews, questionnaires, and workshops, to identify and implement impactful solutions for the realisation of the right to health within the Hawston Community in Cape Town. The chosen project which was aimed ensuring the enjoyment of the right to health by residence of the Hawston Community involved palliative care training and fundraising for personal protective equipment and bicycles for caregivers at the Overstrand Care Centre in Hawston, South Africa. The findings of the project demonstrated that law students if empowered with both qualitative and quantitative research methods can use their legal knowledge to conceive projects that result in transformative outcomes which are informed by legal principles and values advocated and advanced throughout their legal studies. The palliative care training which fostered the enjoyment of the right to health significantly improved caregivers' ability to support their communities, addressing gaps in access to healthcare and building a solid foundation for the enjoyment of the right to health provided for in section 27 of the South African Constitution. For the student, the initiative offered practical experience in project management, interdisciplinary research, and community engagement. It also highlighted the value of experiential learning as a pathway for developing entrepreneurship, leadership, and professional skills. The conclusion by the student was that, practical community-based projects as final assessments in legal education can create both theoretically grounded graduates who are socially responsive and can directly address community needs. Compared to writing a dissertation, this approach which will include a writing component of a literature review fosters a new generation of lawyers equipped with practical skills, a commitment to social justice, and the potential to drive entrepreneurship as well as sustainable initiatives. By integrating such projects into legal education, the author recommends institutions to offer an alternative of community projects as opposed to dissertation writing to cultivate future leaders who are both community-sensitive and practice-ready, bridging the gap between academia and societal impact.