Explore publications.

This paper investigates the relationship between macroeconomic factors, firm financial position, and firm value in Indonesia's property and real estate sector from 2017 to 2022. The property and real estate sectors significantly influence Indonesia's economic growth. Nevertheless, the real estate sector has encountered significant obstacles in recent years, notably during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to volatility in interest rates, high construction costs, and the sluggish property market. This study aims to address the existing research gap by investigating the relationship between macroeconomic indicators, including GDP growth, inflation rates, and interest rates, as well as financial factors, such as profitability and leverage, on the industry’s firm value over a specified timeframe. Using panel data regressions, the study analyzes 162 observations from 27 listed property and real estate companies. The empirical findings demonstrate that property and real estate firms have the potential to enhance their overall performance and increase shareholder value by considering the interconnectedness of economic conditions and the financial position of the firm. Profitability emerges as a significant predictor of firm value, while the selected macroeconomic factors have significant and insignificant effects on the valuation of firms. Meanwhile, since this industry has substantial leverage, this variable does not affect firm value. This study also highlights that the critical component that drives the evaluation of a firm's value is heavily influenced by the specifics of the industry and the regulatory framework in which the business operates.

This study examines the effect of inflation on firm value in Indonesia and uses earnings quality to moderate inflation’s effect on firm value. The aim of this study is to discuss whether earnings quality can weaken the effect of inflation on firm value. The sample of this study is consumer firm listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2016-2021 with a total of 696 firm-years. Using EViews 9 as a statistical software to test the hypothesis, the results show that inflation harms the firm value, and also proved that earnings quality can weaken the effect of inflation’s negative effect on firm value. The findings provide insight that earnings quality can be a solution to reduce the effect of inflation on firm value. Overall, the findings support the previous studies that suggest inflation is an external factor that affects the firm value and can be solved by maintaining the quality of earnings.

This research was conducted to determine the effect of Gross Domestic Product, company value, systematic risk on stock return of the kompas100 listed company. The population of this study were companies listed on the Kompas100 index for the 2017-2020 period, with a total sample of 53 companies based on a purposive sampling technique. This study uses panel data regression analysis with the Fixed Effect Model (FEM) regression model. Classical Assumption Test was adopted to test data validation. The results showed that Gross Domestic Product and systematic risk had a negative effect on stock returns, while firm value had no effect on stock returns, with a coefficient of determination of 74 percent. The findings in this study explain that Gross Domestic Product and Systematic Risk had a negative effect on stock return explained by the investors’ behavior in terms of decision-making. They tend to avoid market risk and purchase blue chip stock when it is reached its lowest. While firm value had no effect on stock return due to investors’ confidence and the good credibility of Kompas100 Index in sorting 100 stocks.

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of assets value added and assets liquidity to stock liquidity in the context and evidence in Indonesia and in relatively different situations and conditions. The novelty of this research is in the assets value added using net value-added measurements, the research was conducted in the context and evidence in Indonesia, this research was conducted in two different situations, namely 2018-2019 (before the corona virus occurred) and 2020 (the corona virus occurred). The contribution of this research fills the narrow research gap in the field of stock liquidity from the perspective of assets value added in the context and evidence in Indonesia. The population in this research are entities listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with a research sample of entities categorized as manufacturing entities, research year 2018-2020, data analysis methods in this research used multiple regression, moderate regression (MRA). Main Findings: (i) Assets Value Added, Assets Liquidity and Information Asymmetry simultaneously effect Stock Liquidity. (ii) Stock Liquidity is positively impacted by Assets Value Added. (iii) Stock Liquidity is negatively impacted by Assets Liquidity. (iv) Information asymmetry weakens the impact of Assets Value Added to Stock Liquidity. (v) Information asymmetry strengthens the impact of Assets Liquidity to Stock Liquidity. The results of this study provide evidence in favor of information asymmetry theory and signal theory.