CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 53/53 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 23 Oct 2026, 12:16 UTC
PUBLICATIONS53In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS053/53 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS1453/53 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.26Per article with a known count
Explore articles 53 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Durban University of Technology7University of Zululand5University of Venda450/53 records with data

Countries

South Africa33Indonesia4Zimbabwe350/53 records with data

Primary topics

Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences5353/53 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 53/53 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-23T12:16:32.743207+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
Bussecon Review of Social SciencesInternational Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
53 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS53
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 53 / 53 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS14
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%53 / 53 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.2653 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 23 Oct 2026 12:16 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations461–576–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

50 / 53 with data · 3 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 53 selected publications.

Durban University of Technology7 13.2%University of Zululand5 9.4%University of Venda4 7.5%Walter Sisulu University4 7.5%University of South Africa3 5.7%North-West University3 5.7%Zimbabwe Ezekiel Guti University3 5.7%Central University of Technology2 3.8%University of the Western Cape2 3.8%Higher Colleges of Technology1 1.9%Kenyatta University1 1.9%Tribhuvan University1 1.9%Cape Peninsula University of Technology1 1.9%Mangosuthu University of Technology1 1.9%President University1 1.9%University of the Witwatersrand1 1.9%Universitas Airlangga1 1.9%Botswana International University of Science and Technology1 1.9%Karatina University1 1.9%University of Lusaka1 1.9%Universiti Malaysia Kelantan1 1.9%University of Johannesburg1 1.9%Accra Technical University1 1.9%University of Pavia1 1.9%University of the Free State1 1.9%Dalian University of Technology1 1.9%Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University1 1.9%Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology1 1.9%Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology1 1.9%Accra Institute of Technology1 1.9%Management College of Southern Africa1 1.9%University of Mpumalanga1 1.9%University of Zambia1 1.9%Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin1 1.9%University of Lay Adventists of Kigali1 1.9%United States International University Africa1 1.9%Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax1 1.9%Tangaza University1 1.9%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia Surabaya1 1.9%University American College Skopje1 1.9%Catholic University of Eastern Africa1 1.9%Padjadjaran University1 1.9%

Countries

50 / 53 with data · 3 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 53 selected publications.

Primary topics

53 / 53 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 53 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 53 / 53 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:43.933799+00:00 — 2026-10-23T12:16:32.743207+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

63.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 53/532018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 53/532019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 53/532020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 53/532021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 53/532022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 53/532023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 53/532024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 53/532025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 53/532026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 53/53 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications05353/53
2018All selected publications05353/53
2019All selected publications15353/53
2020All selected publications05353/53
2021All selected publications05353/53
2022All selected publications15353/53
2023All selected publications65353/53
2024All selected publications35353/53
2025All selected publications35353/53
2026All selected publications05353/53

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0
No citations531–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences
Bussecon International Academy
1001/10.000.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
210121/210.000.021/21 · 100.0%
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
1001/10.000.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
3001330/300.00.00.030/30 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 53 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

An Empirical Investigation of the Determinants of Entrepreneurial Success and Performance of Women-Owned Businesses in the UAE

Jamil Salem Al Zaidanin · Roudaina Houjeir

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

This research investigates the contribution of women-owned businesses in driving economic development within the UAE, focusing on the primary elements influencing their success. A purposive sampling method was used to gather input from the Emirati businesswomen through a custom-designed questionnaire. Data were collected via various methods, including telephone interviews, email correspondence, and on-site visits where applicable. For analysis, the study employed partial least squares regression and structural equation modeling to assess both the measurement and structural frameworks. The evaluation centered on four key dimensions: individual attributes, organizational internal and external elements, support mechanisms, and the impact of national cultural norms. According to the results, business outcomes are positively influenced by individual traits, cultural context, external conditions, and support networks, whereas internal factors appear to lack significant influence. Notably, while the prevailing national culture enhances the overall performance of women-led ventures, it appears to impair the function of support systems. The research sheds light on the essential enablers and cultural limitations shaping the success of female entrepreneurs in the UAE.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i3.44280 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Corporate social responsibility, talent development and performance outcomes: The case of youth-led entrepreneurial firms in South Africa

Monument Thulani Bongani Makhanya

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, talent development, and performance in youth-led entrepreneurial firms operating in South Africa, where youth unemployment levels are high. It acknowledges that Corporate Social Responsibility plays a part in talent development and influencing the performance of an organization which is not well developed in young entrepreneurship. Through bibliometric analysis, the paper depicts the landscape of current knowledge and research trends to key themes, main authors and collaborative networks. Findings show that there is an emerging wake-up call to Corporate Social Responsibility as a strategic drive for the development of human capital and enhancing performance in youth-led companies, with notable gaps both conceptually and empirically on the institutional context of South African youth-owned businesses. This paper recommends that there should be more investment in culture-specific, evidence-based research and greater incorporation of Corporate Social Responsibility into programmes for youth talent development. By linking Corporate Social Responsibility to targeted talent development, long-term performance outcomes can be enhanced, and inclusive entrepreneurial growth for youth may be reinforced as a broad-based strategy for job creation, innovation, and sustainable economic development.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.49360 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Nurturing entrepreneurial skills and mindsets: the imperative role of English methodology in higher education

Israel Creleanor Mulaudzi

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Entrepreneurship is increasingly recognised as a critical driver of economic growth, innovation, and graduate employability in the global knowledge economy. While entrepreneurship education has traditionally been located within business and management disciplines, limited attention has been paid to the pedagogical role of English methodology in cultivating entrepreneurial skills and mindsets in higher education. This study addresses this gap by systematically reviewing empirical literature published between 2014 and 2025 to examine how English teaching methodologies contribute to the development of entrepreneurial competencies among university students. Guided by human capital theory, social learning theory, and the theory of planned behaviour, the study synthesises evidence from peer-reviewed studies across diverse higher education contexts. The findings indicate that learner-centred, communicative, and experiential English pedagogies play a significant role in fostering key entrepreneurial attributes, including creativity, critical thinking, opportunity recognition, collaboration, adaptability, and persuasive communication. Approaches such as project-based learning, academic literacy instruction, digital storytelling, debate, and pitching tasks are shown to bridge linguistic competence with entrepreneurial agency by enabling students to apply language skills in authentic, problem-oriented contexts. Furthermore, English methodology emerges as a transversal pedagogical platform that supports interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation across academic fields. The study concludes that integrating entrepreneurship-oriented English methodologies into higher education curricula is not supplementary but essential for preparing graduates to navigate complex labour markets and entrepreneurial ecosystems. The article offers practical implications for curriculum design, academic development, and institutional policy, positioning English methodology as a strategic contributor to entrepreneurship education and socio-economic development.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.49190 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Navigating  the maze: Unpacking challenges for university educators in South Africa

Jeremiah Machingambi · Chux Gervase Iwu

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Focusing on the challenges faced by entrepreneurship educators in South Africa, we employed a qualitative research approach.  The aim was to offer valuable insights that are applicable to similar educational settings and contribute to the broader discourse on entrepreneurship education. Data was gathered through semi-structured interviews from a purposive sample of seven entrepreneurship educators in South Africa. The qualitative data collected for this study was analysed using thematic analysis with the support of ATLAS.ti version 24. The research reveals that educators encounter challenges in keeping the curriculum current due to changes in technology, market trends, and the rapidly evolving business environment. The findings also indicated that one semester was insufficient for educators to cover all the theoretical and practical aspects of entrepreneurship. Additionally, student engagement posed a challenge for educators as students showed more interest in pursuing formal employment rather than starting their own businesses. Interdisciplinary collaboration, lack of local case studies, networking and industry connections, resource constraints, and short-term teaching contracts were also identified as some of the challenges faced by entrepreneurship educators in universities. The practical implications suggest a need to promote entrepreneurship by implementing initiatives such as workshops and mentorship programs with successful entrepreneurs. The research fills a gap in the existing literature, as there is a limited understanding of the specific challenges faced by entrepreneurship educators.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.48610 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Modelling the interplay of entrepreneurial abilities and support systems on entrepreneurial activity and success: The moderating role of societal value

Chux Gervase Iwu · Eugine Tafadzwa Maziriri · Jeremiah Machingambi · Derek Yu

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Entrepreneurship is essential in tackling youth unemployment and poverty in South Africa. Yet, little empirical research explores how entrepreneurial skills, support systems, and societal values impact university students' entrepreneurial activities and success. This study examines the effects of these factors on students’ entrepreneurial outcomes and investigates how societal values may influence the relationship between activity and success. Conducted among students at the University of the Western Cape and the University of Mpumalanga, the research employed a quantitative, positivist approach. Data from 314 students were collected via a structured questionnaire, and validated constructs were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to test the proposed relationships. Results show that entrepreneurial skills and support systems significantly drive entrepreneurial activity, which in turn positively influences entrepreneurial success. Societal values also directly predict success, but they do not significantly moderate the link between activity and success. Overall, entrepreneurial competencies and support mechanisms are crucial for student outcomes, while societal values enhance success but have limited moderating effects. This research is among the first in South Africa to integrate empowerment theory and an expanded Theory of Planned Behaviour to explain student entrepreneurship. It offers valuable insights for higher education institutions, policymakers, and entrepreneurship programmes aiming to promote success in emerging economies.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.48010 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Role of an Economic Activation Office in Advancing Entrepreneurship within A Rural Higher Education Institution

Ralivhesa Rendani Justice · Chiliya Norman · Anyway Mikioni

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines the role of the Economic Activation Office (EAO) in advancing entrepreneurship within a rural higher education institution in South Africa. The study is informed by Entrepreneurial University Theory, the Triple Helix Model, and the Resource-Based View (RBV), which are integrated to explain how institutional orientation, ecosystem collaboration, and resource mobilisation jointly shape entrepreneurship support. A qualitative exploratory design was adopted within an interpretivist paradigm. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 purposively selected participants comprising EAO staff, university entrepreneurship practitioners, and student entrepreneurs. Thematic analysis identified four interconnected roles of the EAO: entrepreneurship awareness creation, capacity and skills development, stakeholder collaboration and ecosystem coordination, and institutional support and resource mobilisation. The findings show that the EAO operates not only as an administrative support office but also as a boundary-spanning mechanism that connects students and university resources with external entrepreneurial opportunities. However, limited funding, incubation infrastructure, long-term mentorship, and uneven cross-faculty participation constrain its ability to translate awareness and capability development into sustained entrepreneurial outcomes. The study contributes a rural EAO ecosystem perspective in which awareness and capability development are strengthened by institutional resources and external ecosystem relationships, while rural structural conditions moderate the effectiveness of these mechanisms. The study recommends dedicated institutional funding, cross-faculty integration, formalised ecosystem partnerships, structured incubation and post-training support, and targeted policy measures for rural universities.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.14460 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Human Capital Development in the Digital Era: Entrepreneurship Education’s Influence on Entrepreneurial Innovation in South Africa

Arvid Muzanenhamo

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Entrepreneurship Education (EE) is increasingly recognised as a key driver of economic growth, employment creation, and poverty reduction across African countries. It also contributes to the development of digital competencies that support entrepreneurial innovation, highlighting the importance of human capital development in an evolving business environment. Recent technological advancements have transformed business operations, with the integration of digital technologies into entrepreneurial activities reshaping traditional business models, processes, and strategies. Consequently, digital entrepreneurship has emerged as an important socioeconomic force, creating a growing need for education, training, and skills development to strengthen the digital capabilities required for entrepreneurial innovation. This study examines the influence of Entrepreneurship Education on the development of entrepreneurial innovation through a systematic literature review. Relevant studies published between 2016 and 2026 were retrieved from databases including Scopus and Google Scholar. Of the 230 articles identified, 17 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for review. The findings indicate that student support, access to appropriate technological infrastructure, students’ and teachers’ perceptions of technology’s usefulness, and the nature of the tasks undertaken are important factors shaping the integration of technology into contemporary entrepreneurial activities. These findings have implications for promoting entrepreneurial innovation through human capital development in South Africa. The study therefore seeks to inform educators and policymakers about the contribution of Entrepreneurship Education to the development of digital competencies and the advancement of innovative entrepreneurial practices.                                                                        

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.13790 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Resilience amidst Exclusion: Overcoming Structural and Financial Barriers for Women Entrepreneurs in South Africa

Meshel Muzuva · Thandile Ncwana

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Women entrepreneurs in South Africa continue to encounter financial, institutional, geographical, and gender constraints that hinder business growth. This research explores how these interrelated constraints affect women’s entrepreneurial perspectives and the engagement in the small- and medium-sized enterprise sector. Using an interpretivist qualitative method, data were gathered using an open-ended digital survey with 25 women entrepreneurs operating in various South African settings, reinforced by an analysis of pertinent policy and entrepreneurship-related papers. Thematic analysis identified six interconnected themes: financial exclusion and gendered power; gender norms and patriarchal expectations; geographic marginalisation; network and institutional exclusion; intersectional disadvantage; and resilience and survival-focused strategies. Findings show that women embrace adaptive practices such as personal savings, informal finance and diversification, which allow businesses survival but do not always promote sustained success. These barriers limit access to capital, markets, networks, facilities, and value chains, reducing job growth and business competitiveness. Reflecting on feminist economics, decolonial feminism, and intersectionality, the paper contends that women’s entrepreneurship needs to be regarded as a systemic and structural challenge, instead of a single resilience challenge. The research recommends coordinated, gender-responsive actions that promote accessibility to financing, markets, infrastructure, networks and supportive institutions.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.15380 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

How Does Mobile Technology Adoption Drive Growth in Small-Scale Mobile Entrepreneurship?

Dalisu Mhleng Mkhize · Lawrence Lekhanya

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Mobile technology is increasingly prevalent in urban regions of South Africa; nevertheless, there is a scarcity of empirical data evaluating the use and integration of such technologies by small-scale enterprises in KwaZulu-Natal. This research investigates the influence of mobile technology on the efficacy of mobile entrepreneurs within small-scale companies in KwaZulu-Natal. It aims to assess how the integration of mobile technologies influences corporate expansion, competitive edge, and the ability to satisfy market requirements. The research locale encompasses Durban, PMB, Port Shepstone, and Richards Bay in KwaZulu-Natal. The research utilised a quantitative methodology, surveying 384 mobile entrepreneurs affiliated with SEDA in the SMME sector in KwaZulu-Natal. A systematic closed-ended Likert scale questionnaire was used as the main tool for data collection. The analysis of data was conducted with SPSS version 29.0. The results of this research indicate that mobile technologies are perceived as significantly impactful in fostering business expansion, efficiency, and adaptability among mobile entrepreneurs in KwaZulu-Natal. This research determines that mobile technologies significantly contribute to the performance of mobile entrepreneurs in the small-scale industries of KZN. The research will enhance the understanding of mobile entrepreneurship inside small-scale enterprises. Policymakers and entrepreneurs can get advantages by comprehending the influence of mobile technologies on mobile entrepreneurship performance and their impact on business expansion, competitiveness, and market demand fulfilment

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.13430 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Social Entrepreneurship as Driver of Sustainable Development in South Africa and Emerging Economies

Andrew Enaifoghe · Richard M. Mthethwa

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Social entrepreneurship has arisen as a pivotal mechanism for tackling intricate societal issues while fostering sustainable growth. This study examines the crucial function of social entrepreneurs in promoting inclusive growth, environmental sustainability, and community empowerment. Social businesses merge creative business models with social objectives, effectively reconciling profit and purpose while providing scalable solutions to challenges like poverty, inequality, and climate change. The research investigates the processes by which social entrepreneurship advances social development in South Africa, emphasising case studies from various industries and locations. It also examines the facilitating environments—policy frameworks, financial tools, and educational initiatives—that promote the development of social companies. The findings highlight the capacity of social entrepreneurship to initiate systemic change, underscoring its importance in fostering resilient and equitable communities. This research enhances the dialogue on sustainable development by framing social entrepreneurship as not only a corporate strategy but also a crucial catalyst for enduring social impact.    

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12870 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →