CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 8/8 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC
PUBLICATIONS8In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS08/8 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS18/8 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.12Per article with a known count
Explore articles 8 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Higher Education Governance and Development Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Durban University of Technology3Karatina University1Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University18/8 records with data

Countries

South Africa5Indonesia2Ghana18/8 records with data

Primary topics

Higher Education Governance and Development88/8 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 8/8 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:23:05.935952+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
8 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS8
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 8 / 8 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS1
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%8 / 8 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.128 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations71–516–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

8 / 8 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 8 selected publications.

Countries

8 / 8 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 8 selected publications.

Primary topics

8 / 8 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 8 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 8 / 8 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:14:29.339733+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:05.935952+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 8/82025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/8 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications088/8
2018All selected publications088/8
2019All selected publications088/8
2020All selected publications088/8
2021All selected publications088/8
2022All selected publications088/8
2023All selected publications088/8
2024All selected publications188/8
2025All selected publications088/8
2026All selected publications088/8

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0.0
No citations81–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
4004/40.00.00.04/4 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
4014/40.00.00.04/4 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 8 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluating the effectiveness of the quality improvement plan in higher education institutions emerging from programme review evaluations

Samkelisiwe Phokoye · Mavelous Nozipho Radebe · Bongumusa Ngcobo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) play a pivotal role in advancing the performance and standards of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) following the completion of CHE Institutional Audits and internal Programme Reviews Evaluations (PREs). This study explores the effectiveness of the QIP by investigating its impact across critical areas, including curriculum development, infrastructure, student-centred practices, innovation and entrepreneurship, government support, technology, and collaborations and partnerships. As higher education continues to evolve, the successful implementation of the QIP is vital for fostering academic excellence, institutional growth, and global competitiveness. This study addresses the following questions: What factors influence the success of QIP implementation in HEIs? How can QIP initiatives be optimised to achieve strategic goals? What are the measurable outcomes of these initiatives on institutional performance?

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.46770 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Three pillars of financial sustainability

Erna Handayani

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

This study aims to empirically analyze the three key pillars of university financial sustainability—revenue-generating activities, good financial governance, and IT capabilities—with performance, age, and size as control variables. Using a survey method targeting private universities in Indonesia, data were collected from financial leadership representatives across 14 provinces, yielding 627 valid responses. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the relationships among variables. The results reveal significant positive effects of good financial governance on financial sustainability, IT capabilities on financial sustainability and revenue-generating activities on financial sustainability. Furthermore, revenue-generating activities have a strong positive impact on both good financial governance and IT capabilities. The analysis also identifies IT capability as a mediating variable between revenue-generating activities and financial sustainability, as well as between good financial governance and financial sustainability. These findings underscore the strategic role of technology-based governance in enhancing the financial resilience of higher education institutions. Accordingly, the study recommends strengthening the three pillars of financial sustainability—revenue diversification, sound governance practices, and robust IT capabilities—to ensure long-term institutional sustainability.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i8.45240 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Curriculum reform in South African higher education: Policy effectiveness and institutional responses

Haruna Maama

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

There has been intense scrutiny about the design and delivery of curricula in South Africa higher education institutions. Various policies and laws have been established to ensure that the South African higher education contributes to the transformation agenda of the nation. This study contributes to this debate by examining how the South African higher education policies contribute to the transformation of curriculum to meet contemporary socioeconomic needs. The study employs a systematic literature review to synthesise current evidence and adopts a morphogenetic approach to explore how existing frameworks, such as the Higher Education Act of 1997 and the White Paper for Post-School Education and Training (2014), have shaped the curriculum design and implementation processes in South African universities. The paper begins by discussing the internationalisation of higher education curricula and highlights the need for graduates to develop global competencies. It further examines the role of the South African internationalisation policy in preparing students for the global economy. The research also addresses how policy gaps, such as the inadequate focus on decolonisation and the lack of alignment with the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), impact the effectiveness of curriculum transformation efforts. The findings reveal that despite numerous policy frameworks and strategic documents, there remains a disconnect between the goals of higher education policies and the practical realities of curriculum design and delivery. This disconnect contributes to the numerous challenges in the higher education sector, manifested through student protests and dissatisfaction with the relevance of academic programs. The paper concludes that a more nuanced approach to curriculum reform is necessary, one that bridges policy intentions with practical outcomes through continuous dialogue among universities, the government, and industry stakeholders.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.42380 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influence of corporate governance on performance of public universities in Kenya

Peter Kariuki · Beatrice Elesani Ombaka · Paul Kiumbe Mburu

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021

Read abstract

This study aims to determine the influence of corporate governance on performance of Public Universities in Kenya. The study was anchored on social network theory. To achieve the objective, the study was based on a pragmatic philosophy and mixed research design with a target population of 234 University top managers. Primary data was collected using a 5 point Likert type questionnaire and an interview guide. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings revealed that corporate governance had significantly statistical influence on performance of public universities in Kenya. This study concluded that adherence to good corporate governance practices are essential strategies Public Universities can use in their endeavour to improve on their performance. It is further recommended that University top managers should adhere to good corporate governance practices, specifically to management guidelines, allow for public participation and be transparent in their actions. Further, the results present important implications to University top managers, other corporate entities, policy makers, and stakeholders in the University education sector in Kenya and across the world.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i7.14020 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Assessing Financial Sustainability in South African Higher Education: A Comparative Study of HDIs and HAIs Through Ratio Analysis

Calvin Mulaudzi · Arthur Reynolds · Charles Munkuli

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

South African state universities provide aspiring professionals with pertinent undergraduate and postgraduate qualifications that enable youth to follow particular career paths. The obstacle for public colleges lies in their need to sustain financial viability amidst restricted public financing. There exists proof of enduring structural disparities between historically disadvantaged institutions (HDIs) and historically advantaged institutions (HAIs). These disparities have not been investigated in existing research through longitudinal studies. This research evaluates the fiscal viability of two Higher Degree Institutions and two Higher Education Institutions by analysing audited financial reports from 2019 to 2023. Financial ratios assessing liquidity, solvency, efficiency, and operational sustainability were computed and analysed via Resource Dependence Theory (RDT). The findings indicate persistent discrepancies between HDIs and HAIs. HDIs had diminished liquidity standings, increased borrowing, and constrained capacity to produce operating surpluses. Healthcare-associated infections typically possess more robust financial statements due to their varied revenue sources and increased reserves. Nevertheless, all institutions are experiencing heightened financial strain, accompanied by diminished surpluses over the duration. The results suggest a reliance on a limited number of financing sources. This intense dependence on restricted funding sources correlates with diminished financial robustness and increased vulnerability to operational risk. The research indicates that enhancing financial sustainability requires an evaluation of institutional regulations and a novel strategy for generating revenue streams. Universities are advised to enhance their financial governance and diversify their income streams beyond a limited number of sources. If structural reforms are not implemented, financial disparities among these universities are expected to continue, threatening the long-term stability of the higher education industry. These results indicate that in the absence of a significant alteration in income allocation, the inherent financial disparity between HDIs and HAIs would intensify, jeopardising the enduring institutional stability of South Africa's higher education system.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.14820 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Assessing Financial Sustainability in South African Higher Education: A Comparative Study of HDIs and HAIs Through Ratio Analysis

Calvin Mulaudzi · Arthur Reynolds · Charles Munkuli

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

South African state universities provide aspiring professionals with pertinent undergraduate and postgraduate qualifications that enable youth to follow particular career paths. The obstacle for public colleges lies in their need to sustain financial viability amidst restricted public financing. There exists proof of enduring structural disparities between historically disadvantaged institutions (HDIs) and historically advantaged institutions (HAIs). These disparities have not been investigated in existing research through longitudinal studies. This research evaluates the fiscal viability of two Higher Degree Institutions and two Higher Education Institutions by analysing audited financial reports from 2019 to 2023. Financial ratios assessing liquidity, solvency, efficiency, and operational sustainability were computed and analysed via Resource Dependence Theory (RDT). The findings indicate persistent discrepancies between HDIs and HAIs. HDIs had diminished liquidity standings, increased borrowing, and constrained capacity to produce operating surpluses. Healthcare-associated infections typically possess more robust financial statements due to their varied revenue sources and increased reserves. Nevertheless, all institutions are experiencing heightened financial strain, accompanied by diminished surpluses over the duration. The results suggest a reliance on a limited number of financing sources. This intense dependence on restricted funding sources correlates with diminished financial robustness and increased vulnerability to operational risk. The research indicates that enhancing financial sustainability requires an evaluation of institutional regulations and a novel strategy for generating revenue streams. Universities are advised to enhance their financial governance and diversify their income streams beyond a limited number of sources. If structural reforms are not implemented, financial disparities among these universities are expected to continue, threatening the long-term stability of the higher education industry. These results indicate that in the absence of a significant alteration in income allocation, the inherent financial disparity between HDIs and HAIs would intensify, jeopardising the enduring institutional stability of South Africa's higher education system.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.14820 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluating the effectiveness of the quality improvement plan in higher education institutions emerging from programme review evaluations

Samkelisiwe Phokoye · Mavelous Nozipho Radebe · Bongumusa Ngcobo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) play a pivotal role in advancing the performance and standards of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) following the completion of CHE Institutional Audits and internal Programme Reviews Evaluations (PREs). This study explores the effectiveness of the QIP by investigating its impact across critical areas, including curriculum development, infrastructure, student-centred practices, innovation and entrepreneurship, government support, technology, and collaborations and partnerships. As higher education continues to evolve, the successful implementation of the QIP is vital for fostering academic excellence, institutional growth, and global competitiveness. This study addresses the following questions: What factors influence the success of QIP implementation in HEIs? How can QIP initiatives be optimised to achieve strategic goals? What are the measurable outcomes of these initiatives on institutional performance?

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.46770 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Career pathways and institutional barriers for university professional staff in higher education

Ntumeleng Johanna Nkosi · Solly Matshonisa Seeletse · Alex Tichavhasia Dandadzi

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

University Professional Staff (UPS) [administrators, secretaries, and operations managers] perform important managerial duties but are excluded from career promotion that are usually evaluated using academic criteria despite showing excellence in administration. This systemic paradox causes career stagnation, unclear promotion pathways, and undervaluation of their complex contributions, mainly evident in South African higher education institutions (HEIs). This study investigated the barriers impeding UPS career progression, examined their hybrid academic-administrative roles, and explored implications for institutional equity and effectiveness within HEIs. This qualitative study used purposive sampling to select 11 UPS from South African HEIs. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews on career development and promotion challenges. Thematic content analysis was used and identified main themes. Ethical clearance confirmed confidentiality and voluntary involvement. Trustworthiness was protected using member checking and reflexivity to accurately capture participants’ lived experiences and institutional realities. Eleven UPS respondents generated four themes: role perception, institutional support, academic-administrative divide, and social-emotional duties. Participants described complex, developing roles but career inertia due to uncertain promotion criteria and minimal recognition. Institutional support was inconsistent, with limited training and ambiguous career pathways. The divide between academic and UPS staff persists, alongside unrecognized emotional labour, prompting calls for transparent promotion processes and structured career development. UPS undertake multifaceted administrative, managerial, and emotional roles that are undervalued within HEIs. Career progression is hindered by unclear promotion criteria, institutional barriers, and an academic-administrative divide. Training and career development opportunities are inadequate and unevenly accessible. To address these issues, institutions should clarify promotion processes, establish formal career pathways, enhance support programs, foster collaboration between academic and UPS staff, and recognize social-emotional labour. Future research should track career impacts over time and explore interventions to promote UPS equity and development.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i6.10670 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Three pillars of financial sustainability

Erna Handayani

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

This study aims to empirically analyze the three key pillars of university financial sustainability—revenue-generating activities, good financial governance, and IT capabilities—with performance, age, and size as control variables. Using a survey method targeting private universities in Indonesia, data were collected from financial leadership representatives across 14 provinces, yielding 627 valid responses. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the relationships among variables. The results reveal significant positive effects of good financial governance on financial sustainability, IT capabilities on financial sustainability and revenue-generating activities on financial sustainability. Furthermore, revenue-generating activities have a strong positive impact on both good financial governance and IT capabilities. The analysis also identifies IT capability as a mediating variable between revenue-generating activities and financial sustainability, as well as between good financial governance and financial sustainability. These findings underscore the strategic role of technology-based governance in enhancing the financial resilience of higher education institutions. Accordingly, the study recommends strengthening the three pillars of financial sustainability—revenue diversification, sound governance practices, and robust IT capabilities—to ensure long-term institutional sustainability.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i8.45240 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Curriculum reform in South African higher education: Policy effectiveness and institutional responses

Haruna Maama

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

There has been intense scrutiny about the design and delivery of curricula in South Africa higher education institutions. Various policies and laws have been established to ensure that the South African higher education contributes to the transformation agenda of the nation. This study contributes to this debate by examining how the South African higher education policies contribute to the transformation of curriculum to meet contemporary socioeconomic needs. The study employs a systematic literature review to synthesise current evidence and adopts a morphogenetic approach to explore how existing frameworks, such as the Higher Education Act of 1997 and the White Paper for Post-School Education and Training (2014), have shaped the curriculum design and implementation processes in South African universities. The paper begins by discussing the internationalisation of higher education curricula and highlights the need for graduates to develop global competencies. It further examines the role of the South African internationalisation policy in preparing students for the global economy. The research also addresses how policy gaps, such as the inadequate focus on decolonisation and the lack of alignment with the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), impact the effectiveness of curriculum transformation efforts. The findings reveal that despite numerous policy frameworks and strategic documents, there remains a disconnect between the goals of higher education policies and the practical realities of curriculum design and delivery. This disconnect contributes to the numerous challenges in the higher education sector, manifested through student protests and dissatisfaction with the relevance of academic programs. The paper concludes that a more nuanced approach to curriculum reform is necessary, one that bridges policy intentions with practical outcomes through continuous dialogue among universities, the government, and industry stakeholders.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.42380 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →