CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 4/4 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC
PUBLICATIONS4In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS04/4 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS04/4 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 4 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of Venda2I-Shou University24/4 records with data

Countries

Taiwan2South Africa24/4 records with data

Primary topics

Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management44/4 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 4/4 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:23:08.261292+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
4 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS4
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 4 / 4 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%4 / 4 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.04 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations41–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Countries

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Primary topics

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 4 / 4 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:03.265533+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:08.261292+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/4 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications044/4
2018All selected publications044/4
2019All selected publications044/4
2020All selected publications044/4
2021All selected publications044/4
2022All selected publications044/4
2023All selected publications044/4
2024All selected publications044/4
2025All selected publications044/4
2026All selected publications044/4

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0.0
No citations41–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
4004/40.00.00.04/4 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 4 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

How leisure crafting influences leisure satisfaction: A self-determination theory perspective

Jui-Chieh Chang · Ren-Fang Chao · Liang-Chien Lee

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This paper aims to examine the effects of leisure crafting on leisure satisfaction from a self-determination theory perspective. In this paper, it is also aimed to evaluate the mediating role of leisure benefits and the moderating role of work–leisure conflict within an integrated theoretical framework. We employed a quantitative analytical approach using structural equation modeling to test the proposed hypotheses and assess both direct and indirect relationships among the variables. A dataset of 325 hospitality industry newcomers in northern Taiwan was collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed to examine the relationships among leisure crafting, leisure benefits, leisure satisfaction, and work–leisure conflict. Main findings of the study demonstrate that (i) leisure crafting has a significant positive effect on leisure benefits, indicating that proactive adjustment of leisure activities enhances psychological and social gains; (ii) leisure benefits significantly mediate the relationship between leisure crafting and leisure satisfaction, suggesting that psychological need satisfaction functions as a key explanatory mechanism; and finally (iii) work–leisure conflict negatively moderates the relationship between leisure crafting and leisure benefits, such that higher levels of conflict weaken the positive influence of leisure crafting on perceived benefits. Overall, the results extend the application of self-determination theory to the leisure domain and provide empirical evidence for the motivational mechanisms underlying leisure satisfaction in high work-demand contexts.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.50360 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The influence of gender roles on a recreational participation among the Africans: Literature review from an Afrocentric lens

Khutso Lekgothoane · Ananias Motadi Selekane · Osia Livhuwani Munyangane

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

African cultural values and the indigenous knowledge system profoundly shape the gender roles and recreational participation of African people. These values are complex and represent the core beliefs and ideals that influence a community's perception of what constitutes appropriate and desirable behaviour for members of African social institutions. The aim of this literature review is to explore and establish how gender roles shape the recreational participation of Africans, drawing on an Afrocentric perspective to critique and contextualise existing literature. African indigenous knowledge systems reveal that gender roles influence the recreational participation of Africans. The literature further indicated that Afrocentric recreation is not viewed merely as a leisure-time activity but as an integral part of community lifestyle, identity formation, healing, and an intergenerational knowledge-transmission system for Africans. The literature concludes that the Afrocentric perspective reinterpreted gender roles that significantly influence the recreational participation of Africans. informed by African indigenous knowledge systems. It is very logical to conclude that Africans perceive recreation as a holistic, communal, and spiritually grounded activity, in stark contrast to the individualistic, binary-oriented models that characterise dominant Western paradigms.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.47740 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Afrocentric recreational participation patterns of rural-based adults in South Africa: An systematic review

Khutso Lekgothoane · Osia Livhuwani Munyangane · Ananias Motadi Selekane

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Afrocentric recreational participation patterns among rural-based adults in South African social systems are complex and deeply embedded within all the social institutions. The core principles of recreational participation are neglected within those structures, which undermines the intended roles of recreation within the broader social ecosystem. The purpose of this systematic review is to critique and synthesize existing literature on the Afrocentric recreational participation patterns of rural-based adults in South Africa. A literature search was conducted across multiple databases, which include PubMed, Google Scholar, AJOL, Scopus, and CINAHL for studies published between 2015 and 2025 academic year. This review is in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for systematic review. A total of 68,188 studies were initially identified and screened according to the inclusion criteria. ultimately, 41 peer-reviewed studies were systematically reviewed and synthesized. The findings reveal age- and gender-based disparities among participants' Afrocentric recreational participation patterns. Male participants aged 45-50 years have predominantly engaged in agricultural recreational activities such as agritourism and afritainment, spending 3-4 hours once or twice a week. In contrast, female participants focused on passive domestic recreational activities, spending 4-5 hours daily. The literature further shows that both genders participated in digital recreational activities, including social media, music, and television, with males spending 1-2 hours daily. Although there is a common set of recreational activities, the frequency and duration of participation vary across different social systems. The study recommends integrating the principles of recreational participation into existing recreational structures to maximise the positive health and social outcomes of the Afrocentric recreational activities

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.47690 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

How leisure benefits emerge for shrimp fishing consumers: A Self-Determination Theory perspective

Han-Yee Leong · Ren-Fang Chao · Chun Chen

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

Shrimp fishing, a unique leisure activity in Taiwan, provides an important recreational option for local residents. Guided by self-determination theory, this study investigates how leisure motivation and leisure involvement affect perceived leisure benefits, with leisure satisfaction as a mediator. A survey from 359 shrimp fishing participants and structural equation modeling, results how that both leisure motivation and involvement positively influence leisure benefits, with leisure satisfaction acting as a partial mediator. Moreover, leisure motivation exerts stronger direct and indirect effects than involvement. These findings contribute to the literature by extending self-determination theory in leisure research and provide practical guidance for venue operators and managers in enhancing consumer engagement, improving service design, and sustaining cultural leisure industries.  

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i7.43400 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

How leisure crafting influences leisure satisfaction: A self-determination theory perspective

Jui-Chieh Chang · Ren-Fang Chao · Liang-Chien Lee

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This paper aims to examine the effects of leisure crafting on leisure satisfaction from a self-determination theory perspective. In this paper, it is also aimed to evaluate the mediating role of leisure benefits and the moderating role of work–leisure conflict within an integrated theoretical framework. We employed a quantitative analytical approach using structural equation modeling to test the proposed hypotheses and assess both direct and indirect relationships among the variables. A dataset of 325 hospitality industry newcomers in northern Taiwan was collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed to examine the relationships among leisure crafting, leisure benefits, leisure satisfaction, and work–leisure conflict. Main findings of the study demonstrate that (i) leisure crafting has a significant positive effect on leisure benefits, indicating that proactive adjustment of leisure activities enhances psychological and social gains; (ii) leisure benefits significantly mediate the relationship between leisure crafting and leisure satisfaction, suggesting that psychological need satisfaction functions as a key explanatory mechanism; and finally (iii) work–leisure conflict negatively moderates the relationship between leisure crafting and leisure benefits, such that higher levels of conflict weaken the positive influence of leisure crafting on perceived benefits. Overall, the results extend the application of self-determination theory to the leisure domain and provide empirical evidence for the motivational mechanisms underlying leisure satisfaction in high work-demand contexts.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.50360 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The influence of gender roles on a recreational participation among the Africans: Literature review from an Afrocentric lens

Khutso Lekgothoane · Ananias Motadi Selekane · Osia Livhuwani Munyangane

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

African cultural values and the indigenous knowledge system profoundly shape the gender roles and recreational participation of African people. These values are complex and represent the core beliefs and ideals that influence a community's perception of what constitutes appropriate and desirable behaviour for members of African social institutions. The aim of this literature review is to explore and establish how gender roles shape the recreational participation of Africans, drawing on an Afrocentric perspective to critique and contextualise existing literature. African indigenous knowledge systems reveal that gender roles influence the recreational participation of Africans. The literature further indicated that Afrocentric recreation is not viewed merely as a leisure-time activity but as an integral part of community lifestyle, identity formation, healing, and an intergenerational knowledge-transmission system for Africans. The literature concludes that the Afrocentric perspective reinterpreted gender roles that significantly influence the recreational participation of Africans. informed by African indigenous knowledge systems. It is very logical to conclude that Africans perceive recreation as a holistic, communal, and spiritually grounded activity, in stark contrast to the individualistic, binary-oriented models that characterise dominant Western paradigms.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.47740 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Afrocentric recreational participation patterns of rural-based adults in South Africa: An systematic review

Khutso Lekgothoane · Osia Livhuwani Munyangane · Ananias Motadi Selekane

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Afrocentric recreational participation patterns among rural-based adults in South African social systems are complex and deeply embedded within all the social institutions. The core principles of recreational participation are neglected within those structures, which undermines the intended roles of recreation within the broader social ecosystem. The purpose of this systematic review is to critique and synthesize existing literature on the Afrocentric recreational participation patterns of rural-based adults in South Africa. A literature search was conducted across multiple databases, which include PubMed, Google Scholar, AJOL, Scopus, and CINAHL for studies published between 2015 and 2025 academic year. This review is in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for systematic review. A total of 68,188 studies were initially identified and screened according to the inclusion criteria. ultimately, 41 peer-reviewed studies were systematically reviewed and synthesized. The findings reveal age- and gender-based disparities among participants' Afrocentric recreational participation patterns. Male participants aged 45-50 years have predominantly engaged in agricultural recreational activities such as agritourism and afritainment, spending 3-4 hours once or twice a week. In contrast, female participants focused on passive domestic recreational activities, spending 4-5 hours daily. The literature further shows that both genders participated in digital recreational activities, including social media, music, and television, with males spending 1-2 hours daily. Although there is a common set of recreational activities, the frequency and duration of participation vary across different social systems. The study recommends integrating the principles of recreational participation into existing recreational structures to maximise the positive health and social outcomes of the Afrocentric recreational activities

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.47690 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

How leisure benefits emerge for shrimp fishing consumers: A Self-Determination Theory perspective

Han-Yee Leong · Ren-Fang Chao · Chun Chen

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

Shrimp fishing, a unique leisure activity in Taiwan, provides an important recreational option for local residents. Guided by self-determination theory, this study investigates how leisure motivation and leisure involvement affect perceived leisure benefits, with leisure satisfaction as a mediator. A survey from 359 shrimp fishing participants and structural equation modeling, results how that both leisure motivation and involvement positively influence leisure benefits, with leisure satisfaction acting as a partial mediator. Moreover, leisure motivation exerts stronger direct and indirect effects than involvement. These findings contribute to the literature by extending self-determination theory in leisure research and provide practical guidance for venue operators and managers in enhancing consumer engagement, improving service design, and sustaining cultural leisure industries.  

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i7.43400 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →