CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 3/3 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC
PUBLICATIONS3In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS23/3 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS33/3 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN1.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 3 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Education Discipline and Inequality Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of Zululand1University of the Free State1University of Venda13/3 records with data

Countries

South Africa33/3 records with data

Primary topics

Education Discipline and Inequality33/3 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 3/3 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:23:05.905112+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
3 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS3
CROSSREF CITATIONS2
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS33.3%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.67

Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS3
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%3 / 3 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.03 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations21–516–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Countries

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Primary topics

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:14:36.420816+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:05.905112+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

31.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 3/32026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/3 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications033/3
2018All selected publications033/3
2019All selected publications033/3
2020All selected publications033/3
2021All selected publications033/3
2022All selected publications033/3
2023All selected publications033/3
2024All selected publications033/3
2025All selected publications333/3
2026All selected publications033/3

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.67
Median0
No citations21–516–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
1001/10.000.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
2232/21.01.050.02/2 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 3 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring Educators’ Perception on learner’s right affecting discipline in Secondry Schools

Ngogi Emmanuel Mahaye

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate educator’s perceptions of how learners’ rights to safety affect disciplinary procedures in secondary schools in the Umbumbulu Circuit of KwaZulu-Natal. The paper adopted a qualitative approach, where semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from 10 purposively selected educators. The thematic analysis technique was employed to analyse the data. The main findings of the study indicated that educators had their own perceptions of how learners’ rights to safety affect the way they attend to disciplinary issues when a learner has transgressed. The educators’ perceptions of learners’ rights to safety affect disciplinary procedures for many reasons, including poor understanding of relevant education laws and policies. The results also showed that teachers think that the legislation guiding teaching and learning, as well as disciplinary procedures, are marred with contradictions, which make discipline management not only difficult, but also exposes both the learners and the educators to unsafe environments. The study also indicated that the teachers are sensitive to learners’ rights to safety, resulting in restricted attention to learners who are guilty of an offence in the school. In light of these findings, it was recommended that there should be a mandatory continuous in-service workshop for the educators, on how learner discipline can be maintained.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i7.27432 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Balancing discipline and rights: Insights from school management teams on corporal punishment

Boitumelo Joy Masoabi · Bawinile Lamula-Mthanti

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Maintaining discipline is a critical aspect of effective teaching and learning in South African secondary schools. Despite being legally abolished, corporal punishment continues to be used, raising concerns about teacher misconduct and learner well-being. This study explores the perspectives of school management teams (SMTs) on the continued use of corporal punishment. Employing a qualitative approach within an interpretative paradigm, data were collected through interviews with one principal and two deputy principals from two schools. Findings highlight significant challenges associated with corporal punishment, including learner trauma, increased bullying, declining academic performance, and absenteeism. The study recommends that schools adopt alternative disciplinary strategies while actively engaging parents in supporting teachers’ professional development on managing learner behaviour, thereby balancing discipline with learners’ rights.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.47030 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Indigenous Storytelling and Low-Cost Digital Tools as Behaviour Guidance Strategies in Rural Limpopo Classrooms

Tendani Nesengani · Shonisani Mulovhedzi

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Rural African classrooms continue to face persistent behavioural challenges, yet many schools still rely on reactive and punitive discipline approaches that are culturally misaligned and inconsistently implemented. This study examines how Indigenous African storytelling, rooted in Afrocentric epistimologies and Ubuntu rational ethics, can be integrated with low-cost digital usage to create a culturally grounded, scalable behavior-guidance model for resource-constrained Limpopo classrooms. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, the study draws on classroom observations, teacher and elder interviews, learner groups, and digital use records collected across several rural primary schools. Findings show that indigenous storytelling effectively communicates behavioural expectations by strengthening learner identity, supporting emotional regulation and reinforcing communal norms. Simple digital tools such as offline stories, WhatsApp messages, and SMS caregiver reminders extend these lessons into the home context and enhance continuity. The combined approach led to improved learner engagement, reduced behavioural disruptions, a more positive classroom climate, and a stronger home environment and school communication. The study demonstrates that embedding indigenous storytelling within an accessible digital reinforcement structure that provides a culturally congruent, humanizing, and feasible behavior support model for rural African schools. It contributes to scholarly conversations on decolonial education, culturally responsive pedagogy, and inclusive behaviour frameworks by illustrating how traditional knoewledge systems and morden technologies can work together to promote learner well-being and classroom harmony.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12830 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Indigenous Storytelling and Low-Cost Digital Tools as Behaviour Guidance Strategies in Rural Limpopo Classrooms

Tendani Nesengani · Shonisani Mulovhedzi

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Rural African classrooms continue to face persistent behavioural challenges, yet many schools still rely on reactive and punitive discipline approaches that are culturally misaligned and inconsistently implemented. This study examines how Indigenous African storytelling, rooted in Afrocentric epistimologies and Ubuntu rational ethics, can be integrated with low-cost digital usage to create a culturally grounded, scalable behavior-guidance model for resource-constrained Limpopo classrooms. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, the study draws on classroom observations, teacher and elder interviews, learner groups, and digital use records collected across several rural primary schools. Findings show that indigenous storytelling effectively communicates behavioural expectations by strengthening learner identity, supporting emotional regulation and reinforcing communal norms. Simple digital tools such as offline stories, WhatsApp messages, and SMS caregiver reminders extend these lessons into the home context and enhance continuity. The combined approach led to improved learner engagement, reduced behavioural disruptions, a more positive classroom climate, and a stronger home environment and school communication. The study demonstrates that embedding indigenous storytelling within an accessible digital reinforcement structure that provides a culturally congruent, humanizing, and feasible behavior support model for rural African schools. It contributes to scholarly conversations on decolonial education, culturally responsive pedagogy, and inclusive behaviour frameworks by illustrating how traditional knoewledge systems and morden technologies can work together to promote learner well-being and classroom harmony.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12830 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Balancing discipline and rights: Insights from school management teams on corporal punishment

Boitumelo Joy Masoabi · Bawinile Lamula-Mthanti

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Maintaining discipline is a critical aspect of effective teaching and learning in South African secondary schools. Despite being legally abolished, corporal punishment continues to be used, raising concerns about teacher misconduct and learner well-being. This study explores the perspectives of school management teams (SMTs) on the continued use of corporal punishment. Employing a qualitative approach within an interpretative paradigm, data were collected through interviews with one principal and two deputy principals from two schools. Findings highlight significant challenges associated with corporal punishment, including learner trauma, increased bullying, declining academic performance, and absenteeism. The study recommends that schools adopt alternative disciplinary strategies while actively engaging parents in supporting teachers’ professional development on managing learner behaviour, thereby balancing discipline with learners’ rights.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.47030 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring Educators’ Perception on learner’s right affecting discipline in Secondry Schools

Ngogi Emmanuel Mahaye

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate educator’s perceptions of how learners’ rights to safety affect disciplinary procedures in secondary schools in the Umbumbulu Circuit of KwaZulu-Natal. The paper adopted a qualitative approach, where semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from 10 purposively selected educators. The thematic analysis technique was employed to analyse the data. The main findings of the study indicated that educators had their own perceptions of how learners’ rights to safety affect the way they attend to disciplinary issues when a learner has transgressed. The educators’ perceptions of learners’ rights to safety affect disciplinary procedures for many reasons, including poor understanding of relevant education laws and policies. The results also showed that teachers think that the legislation guiding teaching and learning, as well as disciplinary procedures, are marred with contradictions, which make discipline management not only difficult, but also exposes both the learners and the educators to unsafe environments. The study also indicated that the teachers are sensitive to learners’ rights to safety, resulting in restricted attention to learners who are guilty of an offence in the school. In light of these findings, it was recommended that there should be a mandatory continuous in-service workshop for the educators, on how learner discipline can be maintained.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i7.27432 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →