CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 9/9 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC
PUBLICATIONS9In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS189/9 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS229/9 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN2.44Per article with a known count
Explore articles 9 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Agricultural Innovations and Practices Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Huazhong University of Science and Technology3Rajarata University of Sri Lanka3National University of Lesotho29/9 records with data

Countries

China3Sri Lanka3Lesotho29/9 records with data

Primary topics

Agricultural Innovations and Practices99/9 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 9/9 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:23:08.190329+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
9 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS9
CROSSREF CITATIONS18
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS66.7%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS2.0

Crossref citation coverage: 9 / 9 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS22
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%9 / 9 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY2.449 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY2

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations31–556–20121+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 9 / 9 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:14:26.945184+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:08.190329+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

126.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 9/92018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 9/92019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 9/92020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 9/92021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 9/92022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 9/92023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 9/92024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 4 · Annual history coverage 9/92025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 12 · Annual history coverage 9/92026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 9/9 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications099/9
2018All selected publications099/9
2019All selected publications099/9
2020All selected publications099/9
2021All selected publications099/9
2022All selected publications099/9
2023All selected publications099/9
2024All selected publications499/9
2025All selected publications1299/9
2026All selected publications699/9

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean2.0
Median1
No citations31–566–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
3893/32.672100.03/3 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
610136/61.670.550.06/6 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 9 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Does gender matter for household livelihood diversification in Ethiopia rural areas?

Kiros Tsegay · Hongzhong Fan · AM Priyangani Adikari · Hailay Shifare

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021

Read abstract

Nowadays, the non-farm sector gives more attention and high expectations in reducing poverty in sub-Saharan African. Because participation of farm households in the none-farm sector out of their farm activities will play a great role to reduce poverty. Cross-sectional data were used to collect data in 2020 from farm household heads of 371 respondents with the mixed methodology to investigate the effect of demographic factors in none/off-farm economic activities on gender perspective in Ethiopia. In this study, we employ a Logistic regression model to explore the probabilities of household heads' participation in none/off-farm economic activities out of their farm. The result indicated, age and education level have a positive effect and statistically significant effect on increasing non-farm activities with the coefficients of 3.406, 1.956 respectively, confirmed that these variables should take into account in policy development to increase their impact on livelihood diversification. And Gender has a negatively significant on livelihood diversification. FHH is more participants in non-farm economic activities than MHH. Credit access does not contribute to increasing livelihood diversification instead; it contributes to agricultural specialization, not diversification. Surprisingly, family size has insignificant results in non-farm economic activities The outcome indicated it has its implications for the Ethiopian policy and strategy. The government should give more attention to the progressive aspects of non-farm economic activities to eradicate poverty. Whereas, decreasing its negative impact on poorer households by controlling obstacles of non-farm activities.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i6.13765 Crossref citations7 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Does credit access matter for household livelihood diversification in Ethiopia?

Kiros Tsegay · Hongzhong Fan · Hailay Shifare · Priyangani Adikari

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2021

Read abstract

This study examines the effect of credit access on both agricultural and off-farm activities based on a household survey of 371 rural farmer respondents in Ethiopia.it was analyzed using a logistic regression model and statistical description. Findings demonstrated that the demographic factors; gender, age, level of education, and family size have a positive and significant effect on credit access. Agricultural credit access is impacted by each of the demographic variables as independent variables. On the other hand, the result indicated that the relationship between credit access and non-farm economic activities has a negative relationship. Credit access has a significant effect on agricultural intensification and specialization rather than diversification. Therefore, a comprehensive policy and strategy needs for credit access in both the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors. The Ethiopian government should follow the integration policy between both sectors and participate in livelihood diversification strategies and achieve sustainable development goals by 2030 at large.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v3i2.2605 Crossref citations4 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The contribution of cassava production and marketing on smallholder farmers’ livelihood in Dodoma Region, Tanzania

Robert Mashenene · Petro Maziku · Lilian Otieno

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) has remained a major source of food security and income generation for most developing countries including Tanzania due to its ability to drought and disease resistance. At present, its production in Tanzania stands at 630,000 tons while the country's market demand is expected to grow at 7% by 2026.  Therefore, this study assessed the contribution of cassava production and marketing on the livelihood of smallholder farmers in Tanzania particularly in the Dodoma region, so as to explore its potential contributions to the society welfare. A cross-sectional research design was employed whereby a multi-stage sampling procedure was used in selecting a sample of 240 cassava smallholder farmers from four districts in the Dodoma region namely Kondoa, Chemba, Kongwa, and Mpwapwa. Quantitative data were collected through self-administered structured questionnaires and focus group discussion, interview and observation methods also were used in collecting qualitative data from the study area. Content analysis was used in analyzing qualitative data.  A binary logistic regression model was employed to estimate the contribution of cassava production and marketing on smallholder farmers’ livelihoods in the region. The findings from the study indicated that family size, farmers’ experience, land size, education, number of visits by extension, and market access statistically were significant with showed a positive relationship with the improvement in the livelihood of farmers in the selected districts. On the other hand, transportation costs showed a negative relation with the improvement of farmers’ livelihood. Generally, it can be concluded that an increase in production and improvement in marketing variables could contribute much to the improvement of smallholder farmers’ livelihood.  Based on these findings, it is recommended that Ministries responsible for cassava production and marketing which included the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Industry and Trade focus more on the design, promotion, and implementation of policies and programs that are intended to enhance cassava production in rural areas and increase the provision of best farming practices through employing more extension officers.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.26964 Crossref citations5 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Factors influencing choice of maize and beans marketing channels for smallholder farmers in Lesotho

Brian Muroyiwa · Falimehang Daniel Rameno

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024

Read abstract

Maize and Beans are the most grown crops in Lesotho as they are important sources of starch and protein respectively. Agricultural marketing in Lesotho is evolving especially due to the government policy of commercialisation of agriculture which promotes increased productivity and production levels. Most farmers produce for subsistence purposes due to small landholding however, there is emphasis on commercial production which requires marketing skills to be successful. This study investigates the marketing channels utilised by maize and bean farmers comparing CA adopters and non-adopters. Six market channels were investigated in this study and these included  Cooperatives, Collectors, Wholesalers, Retailers, Street vendors and Consumers. The study utilized data collected during a baseline survey for the Agricultural Productivity Programme for Southern Africa (APPSA) Lesotho in 2022 for a Conservation Agriculture project. The survey covered seven districts in Lesotho that included Lesotho Quthing, Mohale’s Hoek, Mafeteng, Leribe, Maseru. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 807 respondents in sampled villages in the seven districts. The data was analysed using the Multivariate Probit Model. The MVP used only four marketing channels;Collectors, Retailer, Street vendors Consumers to determine factors that influence participation in the marketing channels. The study results indicate  that the associated factors for each market channel were as follows: contractual agreement ( Consumer, Retail and Collector), gender (Retailers), household income(Street Vendors) and vehicle ownership (Retail and Consumers). The study recommends for enhancement of access to market information for farmers as it is critical in choosing market channels. Contract farming should be encouraged since facilitates farmers access and use of the collectors and retailers marketing channels.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v6i5.5502 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The role of small town in household livelihood diversification in Ethiopia rural areas

Kiros Tsegay · Hongzhong Fan · Hailay Shifare · PriyanganiAdikari AM.

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021

Read abstract

There is a high expectation that urban-rural linkage in general and the function of small towns, in particular, has a great role in livelihood diversification and poverty reduction in rural areas than sectoral development. However, the previous empirical studies give little attention to the function of small towns and the livelihood diversification of rural communities. We analyze the function of a small town and participating in non-farm economic activities from a rural farm household survey of 371 farmer household heads in Ethiopia. The data was analyzed using a logistic regression model and statistical description. The study found that rural households who have road access have likely participated in none-farm activities and it has positive and significant effects. Education and FHH has also a significant relationship with the function of a small town. Distance from the small town has a significant and positive impact on the non-farm economic activities of rural communities. Overall, benefits from the function of small towns such as the provision of road access, agricultural extension, financial credit services, administrative services, educational and health services are some of the provisions of a small town. Therefore, a comprehensive integrated urban-rural linkage strategy could empower rural farm smallholders to diversify their livelihoods through strengthening small town functions is mandatory. The role of small towns needs to be integrated into rural communities. Participate in livelihood diversification strategies and achieve sustainable development goals by 2030 at large. 

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i7.14071 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Socio-economic determinants of smallholder maize farmers’ participation in global value chains in South Africa

Aneza Madini · Thembalethu Macdonald Seti

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Smallholder agriculture is crucial for sustaining rural livelihoods across South Africa; nevertheless, involvement in global value chains (GVCs) is still restricted. This study examines the socio-economic determinants affecting the incorporation of smallholder maize farmers into global value chains in the Eastern Cape, a region marked by significant rural poverty and dependence on agriculture. The study evaluates the engagement levels of 200 farmers by a cross-sectional survey and multinomial logistic regression analysis. Findings indicate that elevated education levels and income substantially enhance the probability of moderate involvement in value chains; yet, no farmers attained complete participation owing to institutional impediments, including the absence of export permits. These findings indicate that human characteristics alone are inadequate; structural barriers are also essential. The report advocates for structural reforms, particularly those aimed at enhancing education, broadening market access, and eliminating licensing obstacles, to foster inclusive and sustainable participation of smallholder farmers in global value chains.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.45210 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Factors influencing choice of maize and beans marketing channels for smallholder farmers in Lesotho

Brian Muroyiwa · Falimehang Daniel Rameno

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024

Read abstract

Maize and Beans are the most grown crops in Lesotho as they are important sources of starch and protein respectively. Agricultural marketing in Lesotho is evolving especially due to the government policy of commercialisation of agriculture which promotes increased productivity and production levels. Most farmers produce for subsistence purposes due to small landholding however, there is emphasis on commercial production which requires marketing skills to be successful. This study investigates the marketing channels utilised by maize and bean farmers comparing CA adopters and non-adopters. Six market channels were investigated in this study and these included  Cooperatives, Collectors, Wholesalers, Retailers, Street vendors and Consumers. The study utilized data collected during a baseline survey for the Agricultural Productivity Programme for Southern Africa (APPSA) Lesotho in 2022 for a Conservation Agriculture project. The survey covered seven districts in Lesotho that included Lesotho Quthing, Mohale’s Hoek, Mafeteng, Leribe, Maseru. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 807 respondents in sampled villages in the seven districts. The data was analysed using the Multivariate Probit Model. The MVP used only four marketing channels;Collectors, Retailer, Street vendors Consumers to determine factors that influence participation in the marketing channels. The study results indicate  that the associated factors for each market channel were as follows: contractual agreement ( Consumer, Retail and Collector), gender (Retailers), household income(Street Vendors) and vehicle ownership (Retail and Consumers). The study recommends for enhancement of access to market information for farmers as it is critical in choosing market channels. Contract farming should be encouraged since facilitates farmers access and use of the collectors and retailers marketing channels.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v6i5.5502 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Small-scale farmers' market constraints in Ghana: influential farm-level contingencies

Gameli Prosper Agbanu · Dennis Yao Dzansi

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024

Read abstract

This study sought to identify significant barriers to market access and marketing connections for small-scale rural farmers, evaluating the impact of demographic factors (gender, education level) and operational factors (years in farming, distance from home, type of commodity) on these constraints. The research employed a cross-sectional descriptive and inferential quantitative approach to examine the barriers to market access and marketing connections among small-scale rural farmers in Ghana's Volta area. The conceptual framework is based on a multi-theory approach. The contingency theory elucidates the significance of farm size, resource availability, and geographic location; the human capital theory delineates the impact of education level and years of farming experience; and the logistics and spatial analysis framework examines how transportation infrastructure, geographic location, and commodity type affect market access and connections. The investigation indicated that inadequate road infrastructure and elevated transportation expenses were the primary obstacles for small-scale rural farmers in accessing markets, with notable disparities based on gender and educational attainment. The commodity kind, years of cultivation, and distance from home substantially influenced limitations. The study concentrated on the Volta region, however the results are probably relevant to other regions in Ghana because of comparable agro-ecological zones and rural socio-economic traits. The rigorous research design, data collection techniques, and comprehensive analysis guarantee dependable and valid outcomes. Notwithstanding possible constraints in generalisability, the research provides comprehensive insights into the distinct issues encountered by small-scale farmers. It emphasises socio-economic factors affecting market access, illustrates the impact of farm-level contingencies on market access and linkages, identifies both diversity and uniformity among small-scale farmers, and addresses a gap in the literature by offering empirical evidence on market access constraints specific to the Volta region that may have global relevance. These contributions are significant for both academic comprehension and practical initiatives aimed at assisting small-scale rural farmers in Ghana and analogous environments worldwide.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.5421 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Determinants of market participation for small scale broiler farmers in Leribe District of Lesotho

Khutlang Lekhisa · Brian Muroyiwa

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The poultry industry is the fasted growing sub-sector of agriculture in the developing world and this is attributed to several pulling and pushing factors. On the demand side, the issue of urbanisation, income increase and animal protein requirements particularly for chicken has a positive influence on the growth of poultry production. Poultry farming is highly practised in rural households in Lesotho, and it constitutes an important contribution to the development of the rural economy in most developing countries. The poultry industry remains an important sub-sector of agriculture like in many other developing countries and it remains the main source of livelihood for village people and other small-scale farmers in the economy. Many rural communities are keeping poultry as a source of meat and eggs to feed their families, raise income from the surplus and create employment opportunities. However, access to formals markets remains a critical challenge for the farmers. This study examined the socio-economic, market and institutional factors that influenced broiler farmers’ market participation and intensity of participation in the Leribe district in Lesotho. A two-stage sampling technique was employed to select 114 respondents from five villages and the survey data was collected through a structured questionnaire. Heckman's two-stage model was used to analyse factors influencing farmers' market participation and the intensity of market participation. Gender, farmer income, storage access, production experience, extension service, credit access and information access were significant and influenced farmers’ market participation decisions. The study recommends interventions that will increase access and formal market participation.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.33480 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Economic impact of adopting bundled SAPs on crop yield and household incomes among smallholder maize farmers in Morogoro region, Tanzania

Joseph Mugula · Athman K. Ahmad · John Msinde · Michael Kadigi

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

This paper uses a multinomial endogenous treatment effect model and data from a sample of 470 farming households to assess the impacts of adopting sustainable agricultural practices (SAPs) on farm yield and household incomes among smallholder maize farmers in Morogoro region. Results show that combination of improved maize and crop residual significantly increased maize yield by 46%, while intercropping with crop residual (65%), improved maize seeds with manure use (58%), and maize rotation with intercropping (57%). The model estimates indicate that individual elements of SAPs increased yield by crop residual (30%), crop rotation (38%), improved maize varieties (85%), intercropping (58%), and manure (43%) whereas, the application of bundled SAPs had significant impacts on the household income via the following combinations; maize-legume rotation and crop residual (50%), improved maize and crop residual (46%), improved maize and manure (70%), maize-legumes rotation and improved maize (46%), maize rotation and intercropping (68%), maize rotation, improved maize, crop residual, and intercropping (41%), and lastly improved maize, intercropping, manure, crop residual, and crop rotation (55%). The study recommends actors involved in the design, promotion and dissemination of SAPs to find a suitable mix or combination of these practices that will enhance maize productivity and incomes, while simultaneously addressing issues related to the dis-adoption of SAPs, and climate change, by raising awareness and educating to farmers about the benefits of using SAPs and implementing mitigative measures for climate change. This includes providing financial incentives such as loans and subsidies, as well as conducting policy reforms to evaluate and adjust policies that currently favor the use of conventional practices in Tanzania.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i8.29770 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →