CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 2/2 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC
PUBLICATIONS2In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS32/2 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS62/2 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN3.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 2 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Occupational Health and Safety Management Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Anadolu University1Durban University of Technology12/2 records with data

Countries

Turkey1South Africa12/2 records with data

Primary topics

Occupational Health and Safety Management22/2 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 2/2 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:23:02.059872+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
2 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS2
CROSSREF CITATIONS3
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS100.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.5

Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS6
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%2 / 2 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3.02 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations01–526–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Countries

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Primary topics

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:49:30.159616+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:02.059872+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

21.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 2/22020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 2/22024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 2/22026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 2/2 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications022/2
2018All selected publications022/2
2019All selected publications122/2
2020All selected publications022/2
2021All selected publications022/2
2022All selected publications022/2
2023All selected publications222/2
2024All selected publications022/2
2025All selected publications222/2
2026All selected publications122/2

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean1.5
Median1.5
No citations01–526–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
2362/21.51.5100.02/2 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 2 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Improving Ergonomic Conditions at Hospitality Industry

Mune Mogol Sever

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

This study aims to investigate ergonomic risk factors and improve the process in hotel enterprises. The research focused on the main operational process such as food preparation, material supply, and warehouse, in the kitchen, housekeeping and warehouse departments. In the first step, a checklist is prepared according to ILO, OSHA, NIOSH and IEA documents. In this checklist job tasks, workstations and working environment are subject to the study. After controlled by industry experts checklist implemented and results show that there are some ergonomic risk factors in the kitchen. In order to improve the ergonomic conditions 2³, (3 factors, 2 level) factorial design was put into practice. Results show that the greatest effect is caused by Factor 2 (presence of underfoot mat) comes first, Factor 1 (height of the workbench is at elbow level) comes second and Factor 3 (job rotation) comes third.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i2.2022 Crossref citations5 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effectiveness of ergonomics as a labour productivity intervention: Evidence from a selected automotive assembly organisation in South Africa

Robert Walter Dumisani Zondo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

The affirmative correlation between labour productivity and corporate performance has, over time, underpinned the economic theory for the industrial sector.  Organisations in this industry consistently seek methods to enhance workforce productivity.  Their ongoing reliance on labour-intensive production underscores the significance of working posture among operators, which concurrently impacts their physical health.  Improper management of working position adversely impacts production yields and product quality.  This statement underscores the significance of ergonomics.  The objective of ergonomics is to provide an optimal alignment between individuals and their tasks, thereby enhancing comfort, safety, and efficiency in the workplace.  This study examines the impact of ergonomics on workforce productivity within a chosen automobile assembly organisation in South Africa.  The study employed a quantitative methodology to investigate the production and associated experiences of an automotive assembly organisation that has implemented an ergonomics strategy for enhancing productivity.  The corporation functions within the eThekwini Municipality in the KwaZulu-Natal region of South Africa. The study was conducted by gathering pre- and post-quarterly data on production targets met, spoilage, and absenteeism.   The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model was employed to analyse data using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).  The data reveal that neither absenteeism nor spoiling rates correlate with worker productivity.  It disclosed the correlation between the attainment of production objectives and labour productivity. 

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.40771 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effectiveness of ergonomics as a labour productivity intervention: Evidence from a selected automotive assembly organisation in South Africa

Robert Walter Dumisani Zondo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

The affirmative correlation between labour productivity and corporate performance has, over time, underpinned the economic theory for the industrial sector.  Organisations in this industry consistently seek methods to enhance workforce productivity.  Their ongoing reliance on labour-intensive production underscores the significance of working posture among operators, which concurrently impacts their physical health.  Improper management of working position adversely impacts production yields and product quality.  This statement underscores the significance of ergonomics.  The objective of ergonomics is to provide an optimal alignment between individuals and their tasks, thereby enhancing comfort, safety, and efficiency in the workplace.  This study examines the impact of ergonomics on workforce productivity within a chosen automobile assembly organisation in South Africa.  The study employed a quantitative methodology to investigate the production and associated experiences of an automotive assembly organisation that has implemented an ergonomics strategy for enhancing productivity.  The corporation functions within the eThekwini Municipality in the KwaZulu-Natal region of South Africa. The study was conducted by gathering pre- and post-quarterly data on production targets met, spoilage, and absenteeism.   The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model was employed to analyse data using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).  The data reveal that neither absenteeism nor spoiling rates correlate with worker productivity.  It disclosed the correlation between the attainment of production objectives and labour productivity. 

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.40771 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Improving Ergonomic Conditions at Hospitality Industry

Mune Mogol Sever

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

This study aims to investigate ergonomic risk factors and improve the process in hotel enterprises. The research focused on the main operational process such as food preparation, material supply, and warehouse, in the kitchen, housekeeping and warehouse departments. In the first step, a checklist is prepared according to ILO, OSHA, NIOSH and IEA documents. In this checklist job tasks, workstations and working environment are subject to the study. After controlled by industry experts checklist implemented and results show that there are some ergonomic risk factors in the kitchen. In order to improve the ergonomic conditions 2³, (3 factors, 2 level) factorial design was put into practice. Results show that the greatest effect is caused by Factor 2 (presence of underfoot mat) comes first, Factor 1 (height of the workbench is at elbow level) comes second and Factor 3 (job rotation) comes third.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i2.2022 Crossref citations5 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →