CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 4/4 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 29 Oct 2026, 10:44 UTC
PUBLICATIONS4In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS124/4 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS194/4 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN4.75Per article with a known count
Explore articles 4 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: Islamic University of Indonesia Remove ×country: Indonesia Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Islamic University of Indonesia44/4 records with data

Countries

Indonesia44/4 records with data

Primary topics

Banking stability, regulation, efficiency2Islamic Finance and Banking Studies1Employee Performance and Leadership14/4 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 4/4 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-29T10:44:20.199483+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
4 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS4
CROSSREF CITATIONS12
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS75.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS3.0

Crossref citation coverage: 4 / 4 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS19
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%4 / 4 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY4.754 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY2.0

Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 01:54 UTC — 29 Oct 2026 10:44 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations11–526–20121+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Countries

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Primary topics

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 4 / 4 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T01:54:33.690617+00:00 — 2026-10-29T10:44:20.199483+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

63.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 4/42023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 4 · Annual history coverage 4/42024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 4/42025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 4 · Annual history coverage 4/42026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 4/4 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications044/4
2018All selected publications044/4
2019All selected publications044/4
2020All selected publications044/4
2021All selected publications044/4
2022All selected publications344/4
2023All selected publications444/4
2024All selected publications644/4
2025All selected publications444/4
2026All selected publications244/4

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean3.0
Median1.0
No citations11–526–20121+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
412194/43.01.075.04/4 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 4 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Human Capital, Organizational Learning and Their Effects on Innovation Behavior and Performance of Banking Employees

Eka Safitri Apriliani Isa Isa · Muafi Muafi

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2022

Read abstract

This study aims to analyze the effects of human capital and organizational learning on employee performance with innovation behavior as a mediator. This study is conducted at a privately owned bank in Gorontalo City with a sample of 92 respondents. Researchers use purposive sampling with data collection technique that is questionnaires in Google Form. Data analysis is performed using SEM-PLS (Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square) with SmartPLS software version 3.0. The results of this study indicate that (1) human capital has positive effect on employee performance and innovation behavior, (2) organizational learning has positive effect on innovation behavior, (3) innovation behavior has positive effect on employee performance, and (4) innovation behavior mediates the effect of organizational learning on employee performance but cannot mediate human capital on employee performance.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i1.153310 Crossref citations15 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Banking Risk, Third-Party Fund And Performance

Fadhila Rahma · Sutrisno Sutrisno

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

Banks are a high-risk industry, which is regulated by the government through the Financial Services Authority (FSA), so bank management must be very careful in managing banks so that risks can be controlled. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of bank risk and third party funds on bank performance. Bank performance is measured by return on assets (ROA), while bank risk consists of operating risk which is measured by operating expenses to operating income ratio (EIR), liquidity risk is measured by loan to deposit ratio (LDR), capital risk is measured by capital adequacy ratio (CAR), and credit risk is measured by non-performing loans (NPL), and third party funds (TPF) are measured by the natural log of total credit. The research population consisted of 46 banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with a sample of 24 banks taken using a purposive sampling technique. The data collection period is four years with quarterly data (2019-2022). To test the hypothesis used panel data regression. After testing the model with the Chow-test and Hausman-test, the best regression model is the fixed effect model. The results of research using the fixed effect model show that operating risk (EIR) has a significant and negative effect on bank performance, while liquidity risk (LDR) has a significant positive effect on bank performance. Meanwhile, the capital adequacy ratio (CAR), non-performing loans (NPL), and third party funds (TPF) have no effect on bank performance.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i2.27591 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Islamic Banking Profitability in Indonesia

Sutrisno Sutrisno

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

The main contribution to the income of Islamic Rural Banks (IRBs) comes from financing provided where there are two financing schemes consisting of profit-sharing financing (musyarakah and mudharabah) and profit margin financing (murabahah). The main purpose of this study is to analyze the financing scheme that affects the bank's profitability. This study will also analyze the effect of Islamic bank performance on profitability. Financial performance that is thought to have an effect on profitability is the capital adequacy ratio (CAR), financing to deposit ratio (FDR), non-performing financing (NPF), operating expense to operating income ratio (OEIR), third-party funds (TPF) and bank size (SIZE). The population in this study were 165 BPRS in Indonesia with a sample of 100 BPRS. Observation period for 4 years (2018-2021) with quarterly data. This study uses a panel data regression analysis to test the hypothesis. After being tested with Chow-test and Hausman-test, the best model from panel data regression was the fixed effect model. The results of the research showed that profit-sharing financing (PSF) and SIZE have a positive and significant effect on profitability while profit margin financing (PMF), CAR and FDR have no effect on profitability. On the other hand, financial performance which has a significant negative effect is NPF, OEIR and TPF, while CAR and FDR has a significant positive effect.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i1.23911 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

An In-Depth Analysis of Credit, Capital, and Operational Risks on Regional Development Banks' Performance Amidst the Covid-19 Pandemic

Sutrisno Sutrisno

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has hit the world since the end of 2019 and has damaged the world economy, including Indonesia. Banking as a financial institution that provides funding to companies is also affected. Because the pandemic has reduced the company's performance, and this decline in performance has had an impact on banking. The aim of this research is to test whether the Covid-19 pandemic has an impact on the relationship between risk factors and bank performance. Bank performance is measured by profitability which consists of return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE), while bank risk in this study consists of credit risk, liquidity risk, capital, operational risk and the Covid-19 pandemic. The population in this research is the Regional Development Banks (BPD) in Indonesia totaling 34 banks with a sample of 30 banks. The observation period was 4 years with quarterly data so that 320 observation data were collected. Hypothesis testing uses panel data regression, and to select the best regression model, the model will be tested using the Chow-test, Hausman-test, and Lagrange Multiplier test. After the model test was carried out, the fixed effect model was selected as the best model. The research results show that credit risk and operational risk have a significant and negative influence on all profitability, both ROA and ROE. Meanwhile, liquidity risk (LDR) has no effect on both types of profitability, while capital has an effect on ROE but has no effect on ROA. Another interesting result is that the Covid-19 pandemic has no impact on the influence of risk on bank performance.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i3.30620 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

An In-Depth Analysis of Credit, Capital, and Operational Risks on Regional Development Banks' Performance Amidst the Covid-19 Pandemic

Sutrisno Sutrisno

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has hit the world since the end of 2019 and has damaged the world economy, including Indonesia. Banking as a financial institution that provides funding to companies is also affected. Because the pandemic has reduced the company's performance, and this decline in performance has had an impact on banking. The aim of this research is to test whether the Covid-19 pandemic has an impact on the relationship between risk factors and bank performance. Bank performance is measured by profitability which consists of return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE), while bank risk in this study consists of credit risk, liquidity risk, capital, operational risk and the Covid-19 pandemic. The population in this research is the Regional Development Banks (BPD) in Indonesia totaling 34 banks with a sample of 30 banks. The observation period was 4 years with quarterly data so that 320 observation data were collected. Hypothesis testing uses panel data regression, and to select the best regression model, the model will be tested using the Chow-test, Hausman-test, and Lagrange Multiplier test. After the model test was carried out, the fixed effect model was selected as the best model. The research results show that credit risk and operational risk have a significant and negative influence on all profitability, both ROA and ROE. Meanwhile, liquidity risk (LDR) has no effect on both types of profitability, while capital has an effect on ROE but has no effect on ROA. Another interesting result is that the Covid-19 pandemic has no impact on the influence of risk on bank performance.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i3.30620 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Banking Risk, Third-Party Fund And Performance

Fadhila Rahma · Sutrisno Sutrisno

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

Banks are a high-risk industry, which is regulated by the government through the Financial Services Authority (FSA), so bank management must be very careful in managing banks so that risks can be controlled. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of bank risk and third party funds on bank performance. Bank performance is measured by return on assets (ROA), while bank risk consists of operating risk which is measured by operating expenses to operating income ratio (EIR), liquidity risk is measured by loan to deposit ratio (LDR), capital risk is measured by capital adequacy ratio (CAR), and credit risk is measured by non-performing loans (NPL), and third party funds (TPF) are measured by the natural log of total credit. The research population consisted of 46 banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with a sample of 24 banks taken using a purposive sampling technique. The data collection period is four years with quarterly data (2019-2022). To test the hypothesis used panel data regression. After testing the model with the Chow-test and Hausman-test, the best regression model is the fixed effect model. The results of research using the fixed effect model show that operating risk (EIR) has a significant and negative effect on bank performance, while liquidity risk (LDR) has a significant positive effect on bank performance. Meanwhile, the capital adequacy ratio (CAR), non-performing loans (NPL), and third party funds (TPF) have no effect on bank performance.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i2.27591 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Islamic Banking Profitability in Indonesia

Sutrisno Sutrisno

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

The main contribution to the income of Islamic Rural Banks (IRBs) comes from financing provided where there are two financing schemes consisting of profit-sharing financing (musyarakah and mudharabah) and profit margin financing (murabahah). The main purpose of this study is to analyze the financing scheme that affects the bank's profitability. This study will also analyze the effect of Islamic bank performance on profitability. Financial performance that is thought to have an effect on profitability is the capital adequacy ratio (CAR), financing to deposit ratio (FDR), non-performing financing (NPF), operating expense to operating income ratio (OEIR), third-party funds (TPF) and bank size (SIZE). The population in this study were 165 BPRS in Indonesia with a sample of 100 BPRS. Observation period for 4 years (2018-2021) with quarterly data. This study uses a panel data regression analysis to test the hypothesis. After being tested with Chow-test and Hausman-test, the best model from panel data regression was the fixed effect model. The results of the research showed that profit-sharing financing (PSF) and SIZE have a positive and significant effect on profitability while profit margin financing (PMF), CAR and FDR have no effect on profitability. On the other hand, financial performance which has a significant negative effect is NPF, OEIR and TPF, while CAR and FDR has a significant positive effect.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i1.23911 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Human Capital, Organizational Learning and Their Effects on Innovation Behavior and Performance of Banking Employees

Eka Safitri Apriliani Isa Isa · Muafi Muafi

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2022

Read abstract

This study aims to analyze the effects of human capital and organizational learning on employee performance with innovation behavior as a mediator. This study is conducted at a privately owned bank in Gorontalo City with a sample of 92 respondents. Researchers use purposive sampling with data collection technique that is questionnaires in Google Form. Data analysis is performed using SEM-PLS (Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square) with SmartPLS software version 3.0. The results of this study indicate that (1) human capital has positive effect on employee performance and innovation behavior, (2) organizational learning has positive effect on innovation behavior, (3) innovation behavior has positive effect on employee performance, and (4) innovation behavior mediates the effect of organizational learning on employee performance but cannot mediate human capital on employee performance.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i1.153310 Crossref citations15 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC
Full import history & methodology →