CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 4/4 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 29 Oct 2026, 03:41 UTC
PUBLICATIONS4In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS64/4 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS154/4 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN3.75Per article with a known count
Explore articles 4 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
country: Indonesia Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 4/4 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-29T03:41:24.729867+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
4 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS4
CROSSREF CITATIONS6
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS25.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.5

Crossref citation coverage: 4 / 4 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS15
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%4 / 4 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3.754 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.0

Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 00:50 UTC — 29 Oct 2026 03:41 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations21–516–20121+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Countries

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Primary topics

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 4 / 4 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T00:50:52.131819+00:00 — 2026-10-29T03:41:24.729867+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

31.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 4/42020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 4/42021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 4/42022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 4/42023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 4/42024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 4/42025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 4/4 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications044/4
2018All selected publications044/4
2019All selected publications244/4
2020All selected publications244/4
2021All selected publications344/4
2022All selected publications344/4
2023All selected publications244/4
2024All selected publications244/4
2025All selected publications044/4
2026All selected publications144/4

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean1.5
Median0.0
No citations31–506–20121+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
46154/41.50.025.04/4 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 4 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Disaster as Business Risk in SME: An Exploratory Study

Anton Agus Setyawan · Muzakar Isa · Farid Wajdi · Syamsudin Syamsudin

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2017

Read abstract

The concept of business risk has been extended to several new concepts. Disaster, disease, social unrest and terrorism are emerging as part of business risks. This study aim is to explore classification of disaster risk in micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME). This study explains factors and risk perception of disaster prevention and reduction. The study based on survey, which involved 315 MSMEs, focus group discussion and in-depth interview with several key informants. We use content analysis as a basic tool in the data analysis process, with descriptive statistic to complete information findings in the study. Unit analysis of this study are MSME industries, they are batik and textile, furniture and handy-craft and food industry. The result shows that they are interconnectedness between financial institution, local governance and MSME in the disaster risk management model. Each party has obligations in conducting preparedness of disaster and risk protection procedures for disaster risk management. We also find that there is still very low risk perception among MSME in Surakarta. This could be a potential problem when the disaster risk management should be implemented in MSME business.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v6i6.8316 Crossref citations13 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Analysis of Dominant Factors in Improving Performance of Small Medium Industry in the Field Marine and Fishing Processing

Edy Supriyadi · Iha Haryani Hatta · Darmansyah Darmansyah

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2017

Read abstract

The existence of global market resulted in the increasing number of business actors, especially Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Currently SMEs are experiencing increasingly fierce market competition. Even the competition is in an increasingly complex condition. Faced with this condition, SMEs are required to have the ability to survive and improve its performance. The population of this research is the perpetrators of SMEs in the field of fishery and marine processing business in Lontar Village, Banten Province. The sample are participant of 46 SME actors. Technical sampling is purposive sampling. The data in this study is the primary data collected through questionnaires. The result are (1)Competence leader (KOM) has a positive influence on business performance variables (KIN) with a significant value of 0.070 at a significance level of 0.10.(2). Innovation (INO) has a positive influence on business performance variables (KIN) with a 0.000 significance level at a significant level of 0.05.(3). Entrepreneurship (WIRA) has a positive influence on business performance variables (KIN) with a synergy value of 0.00 at a significant level of 0.05.(4). Investment (INV) has no effect on business performance with significance of 0.223.(5). The moderator variables of entrepreneurs have an influence in contributing to the leadership competence of performance. With a significant value of 0.032.(6). The moderator variables of entrepreneurs have an influence in contributing to innovation on the performance of Entrepreneurship, with a significant value of 0.000 at the 0.05 level (7). The moderator variables of the entrepreneur have no influence in contributing to investment on the performance of the company. with a significant value of 0.060 at the 005 level.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v6i6.8300 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Self Efficacy on Work at Government Agencies in Bandung, Indonesia

Senen Machmud

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2017

Read abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of self-efficacy towards work perception and job satisfaction. The population of this study is the employees of government agencies in Bandung, Indonesia. The total samples are 117 employees with purposive sampling technique. This study uses Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for analyzing the data. The results showed that self-efficacy significantly influences the work perception and job satisfaction. Moreover, it is found that work perception has a significant effect on job satisfaction. It shows that the level of self-efficacy can increase the work perception and job satisfaction. It indicates that the high level of self-efficacy will be a positive influence on the behavior of employees in conducting their duties so that it can increase their job satisfaction.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v6i6.7320 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Determinants of Accounting Frauds

Hadri Kusuma · Raden Roro Tisa Rachma Andreina

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2017

Read abstract

This study aimed to examine a number of factors that affect the accounting fraud. This study used the variables consisting of information asymmetry, organizational commitment and individual morality. Theauthors study surveyed the employees at the Office for Management of Regional Revenue, Finance and Assets (Dinas Pendapatan Pengelolaan Keuangan Aset), Yogyakarta Province. This study uses convenience sampling technique method. The data from 96 respondents revealed that the variables of information asymmetry and organizational commitment significantly enhanced the accounting fraud while the individual morality significantly diminished the accounting fraud.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v6i4.7360 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Disaster as Business Risk in SME: An Exploratory Study

Anton Agus Setyawan · Muzakar Isa · Farid Wajdi · Syamsudin Syamsudin

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2017

Read abstract

The concept of business risk has been extended to several new concepts. Disaster, disease, social unrest and terrorism are emerging as part of business risks. This study aim is to explore classification of disaster risk in micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME). This study explains factors and risk perception of disaster prevention and reduction. The study based on survey, which involved 315 MSMEs, focus group discussion and in-depth interview with several key informants. We use content analysis as a basic tool in the data analysis process, with descriptive statistic to complete information findings in the study. Unit analysis of this study are MSME industries, they are batik and textile, furniture and handy-craft and food industry. The result shows that they are interconnectedness between financial institution, local governance and MSME in the disaster risk management model. Each party has obligations in conducting preparedness of disaster and risk protection procedures for disaster risk management. We also find that there is still very low risk perception among MSME in Surakarta. This could be a potential problem when the disaster risk management should be implemented in MSME business.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v6i6.8316 Crossref citations13 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Analysis of Dominant Factors in Improving Performance of Small Medium Industry in the Field Marine and Fishing Processing

Edy Supriyadi · Iha Haryani Hatta · Darmansyah Darmansyah

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2017

Read abstract

The existence of global market resulted in the increasing number of business actors, especially Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Currently SMEs are experiencing increasingly fierce market competition. Even the competition is in an increasingly complex condition. Faced with this condition, SMEs are required to have the ability to survive and improve its performance. The population of this research is the perpetrators of SMEs in the field of fishery and marine processing business in Lontar Village, Banten Province. The sample are participant of 46 SME actors. Technical sampling is purposive sampling. The data in this study is the primary data collected through questionnaires. The result are (1)Competence leader (KOM) has a positive influence on business performance variables (KIN) with a significant value of 0.070 at a significance level of 0.10.(2). Innovation (INO) has a positive influence on business performance variables (KIN) with a 0.000 significance level at a significant level of 0.05.(3). Entrepreneurship (WIRA) has a positive influence on business performance variables (KIN) with a synergy value of 0.00 at a significant level of 0.05.(4). Investment (INV) has no effect on business performance with significance of 0.223.(5). The moderator variables of entrepreneurs have an influence in contributing to the leadership competence of performance. With a significant value of 0.032.(6). The moderator variables of entrepreneurs have an influence in contributing to innovation on the performance of Entrepreneurship, with a significant value of 0.000 at the 0.05 level (7). The moderator variables of the entrepreneur have no influence in contributing to investment on the performance of the company. with a significant value of 0.060 at the 005 level.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v6i6.8300 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Self Efficacy on Work at Government Agencies in Bandung, Indonesia

Senen Machmud

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2017

Read abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of self-efficacy towards work perception and job satisfaction. The population of this study is the employees of government agencies in Bandung, Indonesia. The total samples are 117 employees with purposive sampling technique. This study uses Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for analyzing the data. The results showed that self-efficacy significantly influences the work perception and job satisfaction. Moreover, it is found that work perception has a significant effect on job satisfaction. It shows that the level of self-efficacy can increase the work perception and job satisfaction. It indicates that the high level of self-efficacy will be a positive influence on the behavior of employees in conducting their duties so that it can increase their job satisfaction.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v6i6.7320 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Determinants of Accounting Frauds

Hadri Kusuma · Raden Roro Tisa Rachma Andreina

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2017

Read abstract

This study aimed to examine a number of factors that affect the accounting fraud. This study used the variables consisting of information asymmetry, organizational commitment and individual morality. Theauthors study surveyed the employees at the Office for Management of Regional Revenue, Finance and Assets (Dinas Pendapatan Pengelolaan Keuangan Aset), Yogyakarta Province. This study uses convenience sampling technique method. The data from 96 respondents revealed that the variables of information asymmetry and organizational commitment significantly enhanced the accounting fraud while the individual morality significantly diminished the accounting fraud.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v6i4.7360 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →