CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 6/6 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 31 Oct 2026, 12:58 UTC
PUBLICATIONS6In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS56/6 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS66/6 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN1.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 6 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
country: United States Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 6/6 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-31T12:58:59.303632+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
6 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS6
CROSSREF CITATIONS5
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS33.3%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.83

Crossref citation coverage: 6 / 6 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS6
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%6 / 6 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.06 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.5

Observation range: 30 Oct 2026 17:29 UTC — 31 Oct 2026 12:58 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations31–536–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 6 / 6 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-30T17:29:20.626237+00:00 — 2026-10-31T12:58:59.303632+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

31.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 6/62018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 6/62019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 6/62020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 6/62021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 6/62022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 6/62023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 6/62024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 6/62025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 6/62026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 6/6 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications066/6
2018All selected publications066/6
2019All selected publications066/6
2020All selected publications066/6
2021All selected publications066/6
2022All selected publications066/6
2023All selected publications166/6
2024All selected publications366/6
2025All selected publications166/6
2026All selected publications166/6

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.83
Median0.0
No citations41–526–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
6566/60.830.033.36/6 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 6 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Analysis of the Variables Influencing People's Propensity to use Online Banking Services in Albania

Mateus Habili · Oltiana Muharremi · Meleq Hoxhaj

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

Examining the reasons why Albanians use internet banking services is the focus of this paper. Due to recent technological developments, Albania's banking industry is utilizing technology for an increasing number of banking procedures. We started by presenting some of the key elements that have been identified as having a significant impact on the literature regarding the adoption of online banking, including demographic, socioeconomic, and other elements based on the technology adoption model (TAM). For our empirical research, we used primary data that was collected through surveys that various bank customers in Albania completed. The decreased desire to utilize cash appears to be a key element influencing the rise in the usage of online banking applications and services. Other important factors are the application technical issues and reduction of banking operations time as well as the application security level. The findings of this study will help banks better understand their customers' needs and will provide them with suggestions on how to make technology development plans easier.  

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.22664 Crossref citations4 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Credit Card Lending and the Performance of U.S. Credit Unions

Rodney Boehme · Timothy Craft · Richard LeCompte

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

Is credit card lending by credit unions within the United States primarily a service to members or a profit generating product?  This paper examines the impact of credit card lending on the performance of U.S. credit unions from 2000-2017. A panel data approach using fixed effects regression methodology is undertaken to make comparative analyses of credit union performance across several dimensions including the percentage of the firm’s assets in credit card loans and percent of members with a credit card. Credit unions are stratified into deciles by size and significant results are found using this methodology. Controlling for delinquencies and charge-offs among other variables, credit card lending significantly increases ROA for both large and small credit unions, but only after the Financial Crisis of 2008, and the establishment of the CARD Act in 2009. Interestingly, the ROA of small credit unions significantly increases with the percentage of members using the institution’s credit card.  This result suggests that small credit unions would benefit by increasing the penetration of credit cards within their membership base.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i2.26051 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Life Insurance Performance Characteristics

Raja Bouzouita

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

This study examines the different factors that affect the profitability of the U.S. life insurance industry. Using a panel data from 1997 to 2013 for all U.S. life insurance companies, I find that company specific variables and macroeconomic indicators are statistically significant determinants of financial performance.  Most notably, the statistical analysis shows that efficiency and market share are important determinants of life insurers’ profitability in addition to growth in GDP and interest rate. There is support for the profit persistency hypothesis that previous profitability significantly affects current performance of life insurance companies. Robustness tests by insurer’s organization type provide consistent results.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i1.23980 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

U.S. Community Banks post the 2008 Financial Crisis

Su-Jane Chen · Alex Fayman · Timothy Mayes

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

Although community banks hold a small proportion of U.S. banking assets and market share, they perform a crucial function in the U.S. economy by offering vital financial services to businesses and individuals in regions where major banks do not operate. Their diseconomies of scale put them at a competitive disadvantage in relation to large, national commercial banks when coping with digital transformation and regulatory requirements. These challenges mounted after the Great Recession. This research, with the usage of four key financial ratio categories and the implementation of logit regression, looks into how U.S. community banks evolved in the aftermath of the financial crisis, 2009-2017. It divides the entire sample period into two sub-sample periods, 2009-2012 and 2013-2017, and comparing community banks with their larger counterpart and within the community bank sector between the largest and the smallest asset size quartiles of the group. This study, to the best of our knowledge, represents the only known research at the time of publication that compares recovery of banks post the Great Recession based on whether they are community or non-community banks. It finds that community banks tended to recover more slowly in terms of the bottom line, ROE, after the Great Recession than large national banks. Additionally, community banks are more likely to carry even less capital than their national counterparts in the later time period as compared with the earlier time period. In contrast, banks with higher liquidity and greater operating efficiency are more associated with community banks than non-community banks. Also, the empirical findings posit that size matters, to a certain extent. That is, while size does not command an absolute advantage, a certain threshold may be necessary for a bank to stay competitive. This provides a rationale for mergers and acquisitions taking place in the banking sector.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i1.23660 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Effect of Regional Differences on the Value-Relevance Proposition for Intangible Assets

Kwangsoo Lim · Wesley Jones

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm’s intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.23480 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Credit Card Lending and the Performance of U.S. Credit Unions

Rodney Boehme · Timothy Craft · Richard LeCompte

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

Is credit card lending by credit unions within the United States primarily a service to members or a profit generating product?  This paper examines the impact of credit card lending on the performance of U.S. credit unions from 2000-2017. A panel data approach using fixed effects regression methodology is undertaken to make comparative analyses of credit union performance across several dimensions including the percentage of the firm’s assets in credit card loans and percent of members with a credit card. Credit unions are stratified into deciles by size and significant results are found using this methodology. Controlling for delinquencies and charge-offs among other variables, credit card lending significantly increases ROA for both large and small credit unions, but only after the Financial Crisis of 2008, and the establishment of the CARD Act in 2009. Interestingly, the ROA of small credit unions significantly increases with the percentage of members using the institution’s credit card.  This result suggests that small credit unions would benefit by increasing the penetration of credit cards within their membership base.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i2.26051 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Life Insurance Performance Characteristics

Raja Bouzouita

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

This study examines the different factors that affect the profitability of the U.S. life insurance industry. Using a panel data from 1997 to 2013 for all U.S. life insurance companies, I find that company specific variables and macroeconomic indicators are statistically significant determinants of financial performance.  Most notably, the statistical analysis shows that efficiency and market share are important determinants of life insurers’ profitability in addition to growth in GDP and interest rate. There is support for the profit persistency hypothesis that previous profitability significantly affects current performance of life insurance companies. Robustness tests by insurer’s organization type provide consistent results.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i1.23980 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

U.S. Community Banks post the 2008 Financial Crisis

Su-Jane Chen · Alex Fayman · Timothy Mayes

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

Although community banks hold a small proportion of U.S. banking assets and market share, they perform a crucial function in the U.S. economy by offering vital financial services to businesses and individuals in regions where major banks do not operate. Their diseconomies of scale put them at a competitive disadvantage in relation to large, national commercial banks when coping with digital transformation and regulatory requirements. These challenges mounted after the Great Recession. This research, with the usage of four key financial ratio categories and the implementation of logit regression, looks into how U.S. community banks evolved in the aftermath of the financial crisis, 2009-2017. It divides the entire sample period into two sub-sample periods, 2009-2012 and 2013-2017, and comparing community banks with their larger counterpart and within the community bank sector between the largest and the smallest asset size quartiles of the group. This study, to the best of our knowledge, represents the only known research at the time of publication that compares recovery of banks post the Great Recession based on whether they are community or non-community banks. It finds that community banks tended to recover more slowly in terms of the bottom line, ROE, after the Great Recession than large national banks. Additionally, community banks are more likely to carry even less capital than their national counterparts in the later time period as compared with the earlier time period. In contrast, banks with higher liquidity and greater operating efficiency are more associated with community banks than non-community banks. Also, the empirical findings posit that size matters, to a certain extent. That is, while size does not command an absolute advantage, a certain threshold may be necessary for a bank to stay competitive. This provides a rationale for mergers and acquisitions taking place in the banking sector.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i1.23660 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Effect of Regional Differences on the Value-Relevance Proposition for Intangible Assets

Kwangsoo Lim · Wesley Jones

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm’s intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.23480 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Multinational Corporations and SEO Discounts

Anthony May

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023

Read abstract

The fact that publicly traded companies incur substantial costs when issuing new equity has been extensively documented in the empirical finance literature. In particular, numerous studies show that seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) tend to be priced significantly below prevailing market prices, thereby causing issuers to leave money on the table. Offer price discounting is an indirect flotation cost borne by pre-SEO shareholders that, according to extant theoretical and empirical research, arises due to asymmetric information. A heretofore unrelated literature argues that corporate multinationalism, i.e., establishing operations in one or more foreign countries, exacerbates the asymmetric information problem via greater costs to shareholders of monitoring the activities and performance of foreign subsidiaries. Motivated by these lines of thought, I investigate the relation between SEO discounting and corporate multinationalism. Using a sample of SEOs completed by U.S. firms between 1998 and 2016, I show that offer price discounting is significantly higher in offerings conducted by multinational firms relative to those conducted by purely domestic firms after controlling for known determinants of SEO discounts. This effect is stronger for multinational firms with foreign subsidiaries spread across a greater number of countries and weaker for multinationals that hire a high-reputation underwriter to lead the underwriting syndicate. These findings suggest that asymmetric information costs borne by seasoned equity issuers are increasing in the geographic scope of a firm’s operations, which can be mitigated by certification from a highly reputed lead underwriter.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.22970 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC
Full import history & methodology →