CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 4/4 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 01:37 UTC
PUBLICATIONS4In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS04/4 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS04/4 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 4 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: University of Fort Hare Remove ×topic: Policing Practices and Perceptions Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of Fort Hare44/4 records with data

Countries

South Africa44/4 records with data

Primary topics

Policing Practices and Perceptions44/4 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 4/4 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T01:37:22.331856+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
4 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS4
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 4 / 4 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%4 / 4 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.04 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 01:37 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations41–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Countries

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Primary topics

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 4 / 4 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:08.223067+00:00 — 2026-10-22T01:37:22.331856+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/4 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications044/4
2018All selected publications044/4
2019All selected publications044/4
2020All selected publications044/4
2021All selected publications044/4
2022All selected publications044/4
2023All selected publications044/4
2024All selected publications044/4
2025All selected publications044/4
2026All selected publications044/4

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0.0
No citations41–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
1001/10.000.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
3003/30.000.03/3 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 4 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

We are working with what we have: Operational realities, improvisation, and officer coping strategies in under-resourced rural police stations

Thompho Tshivhase · Lutho Ngozi

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Rural police stations in South Africa continue to operate under conditions of severe resource scarcity. This study examines the operational realities of police officers working in under-resourced rural police stations in the Eastern Cape Province, focusing on how they adapt through improvisation and coping strategies. A qualitative research approach was employed using semi-structured interviews with 15 purposively selected police officers involved in frontline and investigative duties. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings show that officers face shortages that affect patrols, response times, and investigations. To manage these constraints, officers depend on improvisation strategies such as sharing resources, adjusting work routines, using personal devices, and cooperating closely with local communities. While these strategies demonstrate resilience and commitment, they also place pressure on officers and risk normalising inadequate working conditions. This study contributes to rural policing scholarship by demonstrating how policing is sustained through everyday adaptation under conditions of chronic scarcity and highlights the implications for institutional accountability and officer wellbeing. In doing so, the study aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), through its focus on improving working conditions and supporting police officers operating in resource-constrained rural environments.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.49720 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Police visibility, crime reduction and community trust: Evidence from hot spot Policing in selected Tembisa townships

Thompho Tshivhase · Kabelo Mmola

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of police visibility in reducing crime and enhancing community trust in the police within the selected area in Tembisa township, South Africa. Guided by Rational choice theory to explain how the presence of police visibility alters cost-benefit analysis by increasing the risk of detection and apprehension.  A mixed-method approach was employed; qualitative data were collected using structured interviews with 151 participants, including police officers, community policing forum members and community residents, while quantitative data were gathered using paper-based questionnaires and analysed using descriptive statistics in SPSS. Thematic analysis was used to interpret qualitative responses. The findings indicate that police visibility in identified crime hot spots was frequent and unpredictable, implemented through strategies such as roadblocks, stop-and-search operations, random night patrols, and escorting commuters to taxi ranks during early morning hours. Participants reported a notable reduction in street and violent crime, accompanied by improved perceptions of safety and increased community trust in the police. However, challenges including over-policing, internal misconduct and poor professionalism, such as officers soliciting money during patrols, undermined trust in some areas. the study recommends strengthening hot-spot policing through increased personnel, improved oversight, and the use of body-worn cameras for urgent government investment in police operations. 

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.49640 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Community-police relations and informal guardianship in rural South Africa: Lessons from the uMlalazi crime prevention experience

Thompho Tshivhase · Thando Chonco

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This paper examines the ambivalent relationship between community–police relations and informal guardianship systems in rural crime prevention in uMlalazi Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Rural communities continue to experience persistent crime alongside low levels of trust in formal policing structures, raising questions about the effectiveness of institutional crime prevention strategies. The study explores how trust and distrust shape crime-reporting behaviour, evaluates the effectiveness of Community Policing Forums (CPFs) in rural contexts, and examines how informal guardianship systems interact with traditional and municipal governance institutions. A qualitative research design was adopted, using semi-structured interviews with 15 purposively selected participants, including SAPS officers, CPF members, traditional leaders, municipal officials, and community members. Data were analysed thematically to identify patterns of cooperation, conflict, fear, and silence in everyday crime prevention practices. The findings reveal that CPFs are often weakened by criminal infiltration and fragile community–police partnerships. Traditional leaders emerge as primary informal guardians, enjoying strong cultural legitimacy but operating without a clear legal framework. In geographically isolated communities, residents have developed advanced digital surveillance and first-response systems to compensate for delayed police response; however, these initiatives remain unrecognised and unsupported by formal policing institutions. The study concludes that rural crime prevention failures are driven less by resource constraints than by deep-rooted mistrust, highlighting the need for relationship-oriented policy interventions rather than infrastructure-focused solutions.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.49440 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Challenges and Limits of Community Policing as a Crime Prevention Strategy: Police and Community Perspectives from Bizana, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Thompho Tshivhase · Oyama Sikibi

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Community policing was introduced in post-apartheid South Africa to rebuild trust between law enforcement and communities. However, its crime prevention role is limited by persistent challenges. This study explores these limitations through the perceptions of police officers and community members in Bizana, Eastern Cape, using a qualitative design and semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis identified key obstacles: limited police resources, rural–urban inequalities, weak community engagement, and inadequate training. While community policing contributes to social control, crime prevention, and safety, its impact is undermined by poor police–community cooperation and fear of victimisation, which deters reporting and hotspot identification. Structural factors, including poor roads and a shortage of police vehicles, fuel rising rural crime, especially stock theft and drug-related offences. Limited institutional support for Community Policing Forums and night patrols further reduces their sustainability and effectiveness. The study offers context-specific insights into the implementation of community policing in rural South Africa and underscores the need for better resource allocation, stronger partnerships, and context-responsive strategies. It also advances global development priorities, particularly SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), by emphasising accountable, inclusive, and effective policing systems.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12570 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Challenges and Limits of Community Policing as a Crime Prevention Strategy: Police and Community Perspectives from Bizana, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Thompho Tshivhase · Oyama Sikibi

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Community policing was introduced in post-apartheid South Africa to rebuild trust between law enforcement and communities. However, its crime prevention role is limited by persistent challenges. This study explores these limitations through the perceptions of police officers and community members in Bizana, Eastern Cape, using a qualitative design and semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis identified key obstacles: limited police resources, rural–urban inequalities, weak community engagement, and inadequate training. While community policing contributes to social control, crime prevention, and safety, its impact is undermined by poor police–community cooperation and fear of victimisation, which deters reporting and hotspot identification. Structural factors, including poor roads and a shortage of police vehicles, fuel rising rural crime, especially stock theft and drug-related offences. Limited institutional support for Community Policing Forums and night patrols further reduces their sustainability and effectiveness. The study offers context-specific insights into the implementation of community policing in rural South Africa and underscores the need for better resource allocation, stronger partnerships, and context-responsive strategies. It also advances global development priorities, particularly SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), by emphasising accountable, inclusive, and effective policing systems.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12570 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

We are working with what we have: Operational realities, improvisation, and officer coping strategies in under-resourced rural police stations

Thompho Tshivhase · Lutho Ngozi

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Rural police stations in South Africa continue to operate under conditions of severe resource scarcity. This study examines the operational realities of police officers working in under-resourced rural police stations in the Eastern Cape Province, focusing on how they adapt through improvisation and coping strategies. A qualitative research approach was employed using semi-structured interviews with 15 purposively selected police officers involved in frontline and investigative duties. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings show that officers face shortages that affect patrols, response times, and investigations. To manage these constraints, officers depend on improvisation strategies such as sharing resources, adjusting work routines, using personal devices, and cooperating closely with local communities. While these strategies demonstrate resilience and commitment, they also place pressure on officers and risk normalising inadequate working conditions. This study contributes to rural policing scholarship by demonstrating how policing is sustained through everyday adaptation under conditions of chronic scarcity and highlights the implications for institutional accountability and officer wellbeing. In doing so, the study aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), through its focus on improving working conditions and supporting police officers operating in resource-constrained rural environments.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.49720 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Police visibility, crime reduction and community trust: Evidence from hot spot Policing in selected Tembisa townships

Thompho Tshivhase · Kabelo Mmola

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of police visibility in reducing crime and enhancing community trust in the police within the selected area in Tembisa township, South Africa. Guided by Rational choice theory to explain how the presence of police visibility alters cost-benefit analysis by increasing the risk of detection and apprehension.  A mixed-method approach was employed; qualitative data were collected using structured interviews with 151 participants, including police officers, community policing forum members and community residents, while quantitative data were gathered using paper-based questionnaires and analysed using descriptive statistics in SPSS. Thematic analysis was used to interpret qualitative responses. The findings indicate that police visibility in identified crime hot spots was frequent and unpredictable, implemented through strategies such as roadblocks, stop-and-search operations, random night patrols, and escorting commuters to taxi ranks during early morning hours. Participants reported a notable reduction in street and violent crime, accompanied by improved perceptions of safety and increased community trust in the police. However, challenges including over-policing, internal misconduct and poor professionalism, such as officers soliciting money during patrols, undermined trust in some areas. the study recommends strengthening hot-spot policing through increased personnel, improved oversight, and the use of body-worn cameras for urgent government investment in police operations. 

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.49640 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Community-police relations and informal guardianship in rural South Africa: Lessons from the uMlalazi crime prevention experience

Thompho Tshivhase · Thando Chonco

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This paper examines the ambivalent relationship between community–police relations and informal guardianship systems in rural crime prevention in uMlalazi Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Rural communities continue to experience persistent crime alongside low levels of trust in formal policing structures, raising questions about the effectiveness of institutional crime prevention strategies. The study explores how trust and distrust shape crime-reporting behaviour, evaluates the effectiveness of Community Policing Forums (CPFs) in rural contexts, and examines how informal guardianship systems interact with traditional and municipal governance institutions. A qualitative research design was adopted, using semi-structured interviews with 15 purposively selected participants, including SAPS officers, CPF members, traditional leaders, municipal officials, and community members. Data were analysed thematically to identify patterns of cooperation, conflict, fear, and silence in everyday crime prevention practices. The findings reveal that CPFs are often weakened by criminal infiltration and fragile community–police partnerships. Traditional leaders emerge as primary informal guardians, enjoying strong cultural legitimacy but operating without a clear legal framework. In geographically isolated communities, residents have developed advanced digital surveillance and first-response systems to compensate for delayed police response; however, these initiatives remain unrecognised and unsupported by formal policing institutions. The study concludes that rural crime prevention failures are driven less by resource constraints than by deep-rooted mistrust, highlighting the need for relationship-oriented policy interventions rather than infrastructure-focused solutions.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.49440 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →