Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 29 Oct 2026 18:05 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 3 | 3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:06.733266+00:00 — 2026-10-29T18:05:24.145961+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 3 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3/3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3/3 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Blended learning has emerged as a transformative approach in higher education, yet for many lecturers, the rapid integration of digital tools has created more challenges than opportunities. This study aimed to critically evaluate how lecturers at a University of Technology perceive and integrate digital tools and teaching strategies within blended learning environments, addressing a gap in the literature on lecturer-centred, contextually grounded perspectives in South African Universities of Technology. Adopting a qualitative research approach within an interpretivist paradigm, the study employed a case study design, involving twelve purposively sampled lecturers who actively engage with blended learning. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis, ensuring rich, context-sensitive insights. The findings revealed a spectrum of practices: some lecturers primarily used digital tools for content delivery, while others employed innovative, student-centred strategies aligned with TPACK and Community of Inquiry frameworks, demonstrating enhanced cognitive, social, and teaching presence. Institutional factors, including professional development, infrastructure, and peer support, were found to significantly influence pedagogical decision-making. The study contributes to the understanding of blended learning in South African higher education by highlighting the interplay between lecturer agency, pedagogical reasoning, and institutional support, and it recommends targeted professional development, strategic infrastructural support, and the promotion of collaborative communities of practice to enhance effective blended teaching.
This study sought to investigate how conversation in teaching and learning improves communication competence among Grade 9 learners, specifically in Technology sessions. A qualitative research design was utilised, informed by social constructivist theory. Six Technology educators were intentionally selected from three public secondary schools in the Tshwane South District. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews and classroom observations, subsequently transcribed, categorised, and analysed thematically. The research indicated that students participated more vigorously in classroom discussions when their input was regarded as significant. Notwithstanding obstacles including overcrowded classrooms and elevated noise levels, educators' implementation of dialogue and questioning techniques fostered reflection, elucidated comprehension, and enhanced communicative proficiency. Students also encountered heightened satisfaction and engagement as their conceptual comprehension intensified. Educators must prioritise discussion in lesson preparation and provide activities that promote significant learner interactions. Moreover, fostering a supportive and secure classroom atmosphere is essential to promote students' confidence in engaging in conversations. This study enhances the comprehension of dialogue's practical application in Technology education, emphasising its significance in cultivating learners' communication skills and providing insights for educators aiming to improve interactive and reflective learning methodologies.
This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of storage in the South African automobile industry, pinpointing difficulties and prospective methods for enhancement. It aims to ascertain how effective warehousing might aid in surmounting logistical challenges and enhancing overall supply chain performance. A qualitative study methodology was utilised to investigate the influence of storage on the automobile industry in South Africa. Exploratory and descriptive research designs were employed to fulfil the research objectives. The target group comprised supply chain specialists from specific automotive manufacturers in Gauteng Province. A purposive sampling method was employed, and data were gathered via structured interviews with 15 individuals. The data were examined via ATLAS.ti Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS), resulting in the identification of principal themes and sub-themes. The research indicated that warehousing is crucial in mitigating obstacles encountered by the South African automotive sector, such as unreliable rail transit, restricted capacity, and elevated port expenses. The incorporation of automation, digital technology, and Industry 4.0 concepts could markedly improve warehousing efficiency. Essential recommendations for enhancing warehousing efficiency encompass the implementation of automated technologies, adherence to circular economy principles, and investment in quality management best practices. The results offer practical suggestions for automobile manufacturers and supply chain experts to enhance warehouse operations. By adopting innovative technologies and optimal processes, organisations may tackle current difficulties, lower operating expenses, and secure a competitive advantage in the South African market. The research underscores the necessity of synchronising warehouse strategies with overarching trends in digital transformation and sustainability. This study enhances the existing knowledge on warehousing in the automotive industry, specifically in the South African setting. It offers distinctive perspectives on how technical advancements and industry trends can enhance warehousing operations and assist the sector in addressing region-specific difficulties. The study emphasises the significance of a comprehensive strategy in warehousing, incorporating automation, digital technology, and sustainability principles.
Blended learning has emerged as a transformative approach in higher education, yet for many lecturers, the rapid integration of digital tools has created more challenges than opportunities. This study aimed to critically evaluate how lecturers at a University of Technology perceive and integrate digital tools and teaching strategies within blended learning environments, addressing a gap in the literature on lecturer-centred, contextually grounded perspectives in South African Universities of Technology. Adopting a qualitative research approach within an interpretivist paradigm, the study employed a case study design, involving twelve purposively sampled lecturers who actively engage with blended learning. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis, ensuring rich, context-sensitive insights. The findings revealed a spectrum of practices: some lecturers primarily used digital tools for content delivery, while others employed innovative, student-centred strategies aligned with TPACK and Community of Inquiry frameworks, demonstrating enhanced cognitive, social, and teaching presence. Institutional factors, including professional development, infrastructure, and peer support, were found to significantly influence pedagogical decision-making. The study contributes to the understanding of blended learning in South African higher education by highlighting the interplay between lecturer agency, pedagogical reasoning, and institutional support, and it recommends targeted professional development, strategic infrastructural support, and the promotion of collaborative communities of practice to enhance effective blended teaching.
This study sought to investigate how conversation in teaching and learning improves communication competence among Grade 9 learners, specifically in Technology sessions. A qualitative research design was utilised, informed by social constructivist theory. Six Technology educators were intentionally selected from three public secondary schools in the Tshwane South District. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews and classroom observations, subsequently transcribed, categorised, and analysed thematically. The research indicated that students participated more vigorously in classroom discussions when their input was regarded as significant. Notwithstanding obstacles including overcrowded classrooms and elevated noise levels, educators' implementation of dialogue and questioning techniques fostered reflection, elucidated comprehension, and enhanced communicative proficiency. Students also encountered heightened satisfaction and engagement as their conceptual comprehension intensified. Educators must prioritise discussion in lesson preparation and provide activities that promote significant learner interactions. Moreover, fostering a supportive and secure classroom atmosphere is essential to promote students' confidence in engaging in conversations. This study enhances the comprehension of dialogue's practical application in Technology education, emphasising its significance in cultivating learners' communication skills and providing insights for educators aiming to improve interactive and reflective learning methodologies.
This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of storage in the South African automobile industry, pinpointing difficulties and prospective methods for enhancement. It aims to ascertain how effective warehousing might aid in surmounting logistical challenges and enhancing overall supply chain performance. A qualitative study methodology was utilised to investigate the influence of storage on the automobile industry in South Africa. Exploratory and descriptive research designs were employed to fulfil the research objectives. The target group comprised supply chain specialists from specific automotive manufacturers in Gauteng Province. A purposive sampling method was employed, and data were gathered via structured interviews with 15 individuals. The data were examined via ATLAS.ti Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS), resulting in the identification of principal themes and sub-themes. The research indicated that warehousing is crucial in mitigating obstacles encountered by the South African automotive sector, such as unreliable rail transit, restricted capacity, and elevated port expenses. The incorporation of automation, digital technology, and Industry 4.0 concepts could markedly improve warehousing efficiency. Essential recommendations for enhancing warehousing efficiency encompass the implementation of automated technologies, adherence to circular economy principles, and investment in quality management best practices. The results offer practical suggestions for automobile manufacturers and supply chain experts to enhance warehouse operations. By adopting innovative technologies and optimal processes, organisations may tackle current difficulties, lower operating expenses, and secure a competitive advantage in the South African market. The research underscores the necessity of synchronising warehouse strategies with overarching trends in digital transformation and sustainability. This study enhances the existing knowledge on warehousing in the automotive industry, specifically in the South African setting. It offers distinctive perspectives on how technical advancements and industry trends can enhance warehousing operations and assist the sector in addressing region-specific difficulties. The study emphasises the significance of a comprehensive strategy in warehousing, incorporating automation, digital technology, and sustainability principles.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |