Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | All selected publications | 2 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | All selected publications | 14 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 9 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | All selected publications | 29 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 16 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:49:39.734945+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:22:48.943582+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 1 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 14 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 11 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 11 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 8 | 3 | 3/3 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 1 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 3 | 23 | 45 | 3/3 | 7.67 | 7 | 100.0 | 3/3 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Nowadays online shopping industry is growing rapidly, and social media platforms are a major part of promotional activities for many companies in Indonesia. The research aims to examine the relationship between price perception, brand image and digital marketing variables and purchase intention and brand loyalty. Design research is a quantitative research using a survey method with a questionnaire; the sampling technique is purposive random sampling. Using a structural equation modeling approach with AMOS software and 303 respondents, results show that price perception corporate image, and digital marketing promotion activities have significant and positive effects on purchase intention, while brand image does not directly have a significant effect on purchase intention. Furthermore, purchase intention has a significant effect on brand loyalty.
Indonesia has a lot of sectors that function to drive economic activity. One of the existing sectors is the banking industry. A bank has the primary aim of gaining loyalty from its customers. Besides improving service quality, maintaining the corporate image and increasing customer satisfaction also affect customer loyalty. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of service quality, corporate image, and customer satisfaction on customer loyalty. The research method is survey research, which uses a questionnaire as a research instrument. This study's population is customers with a bank account in Indonesia, with a total of 200 respondents. The result shows that the variable of service quality, and corporate image, has a positive and significant effect on customer satisfaction and customer satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on customer loyalty. In contrast, service quality and the corporate image does not have a positive and significant effect on customer loyalty.
Along with the increasing demand for qualified skincare products these days, there are many companies in Indonesia that produce facial beauty products that emphasize a good image in the minds of the consumers and intensive promotion. This study was conducted to determine whether the promotion, product quality, and brand image affect the purchase decisions. The research was conducted using a survey method using a questionnaire to a sample of 200 respondents who used Wardah Cosmetics beauty products. The sample was obtained by doing a purposive random sampling technique. The data analysis technique used in this research was using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using the AMOS program. The results of this study indicated that the promotion and the product quality had a significant effect on the brand image and brand image has a significant effect on purchasing decisions.
Nowadays online shopping industry is growing rapidly, and social media platforms are a major part of promotional activities for many companies in Indonesia. The research aims to examine the relationship between price perception, brand image and digital marketing variables and purchase intention and brand loyalty. Design research is a quantitative research using a survey method with a questionnaire; the sampling technique is purposive random sampling. Using a structural equation modeling approach with AMOS software and 303 respondents, results show that price perception corporate image, and digital marketing promotion activities have significant and positive effects on purchase intention, while brand image does not directly have a significant effect on purchase intention. Furthermore, purchase intention has a significant effect on brand loyalty.
Indonesia has a lot of sectors that function to drive economic activity. One of the existing sectors is the banking industry. A bank has the primary aim of gaining loyalty from its customers. Besides improving service quality, maintaining the corporate image and increasing customer satisfaction also affect customer loyalty. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of service quality, corporate image, and customer satisfaction on customer loyalty. The research method is survey research, which uses a questionnaire as a research instrument. This study's population is customers with a bank account in Indonesia, with a total of 200 respondents. The result shows that the variable of service quality, and corporate image, has a positive and significant effect on customer satisfaction and customer satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on customer loyalty. In contrast, service quality and the corporate image does not have a positive and significant effect on customer loyalty.
Along with the increasing demand for qualified skincare products these days, there are many companies in Indonesia that produce facial beauty products that emphasize a good image in the minds of the consumers and intensive promotion. This study was conducted to determine whether the promotion, product quality, and brand image affect the purchase decisions. The research was conducted using a survey method using a questionnaire to a sample of 200 respondents who used Wardah Cosmetics beauty products. The sample was obtained by doing a purposive random sampling technique. The data analysis technique used in this research was using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using the AMOS program. The results of this study indicated that the promotion and the product quality had a significant effect on the brand image and brand image has a significant effect on purchasing decisions.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |