CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 10/10 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 29 Oct 2026, 10:58 UTC
PUBLICATIONS10In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS010/10 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS010/10 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 10 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: Cape Peninsula University of Technology Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 10/10 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-29T10:58:57.291669+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
10 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS10
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 10 / 10 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%10 / 10 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.010 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 29 Oct 2026 10:58 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations101–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 10 / 10 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:05.928888+00:00 — 2026-10-29T10:58:57.291669+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 10/102018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 10/102019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 10/102020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 10/102021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 10/102022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 10/102023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 10/102024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 10/102025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 10/102026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 10/10 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications01010/10
2018All selected publications01010/10
2019All selected publications01010/10
2020All selected publications01010/10
2021All selected publications01010/10
2022All selected publications01010/10
2023All selected publications01010/10
2024All selected publications01010/10
2025All selected publications01010/10
2026All selected publications01010/10

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0.0
No citations101–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
100010/100.00.00.010/10 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 10 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Examining the constitutional linguistic rights on the use of English as a lingua franca in South African courts system

Sandile Dike · Lutendo Nendauni

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, grants all official languages parity of esteem and equal treatment. The Constitution also recognises injustices of the past and historical diminished use of indigenous (African) languages. It is against this backdrop that this democratic constitution calls-upon the national and provincial government to take practical and positive measures in encouraging the use and elevation of the status of African languages. In advocating for these languages, the Constitution declares that a minimum of two official languages be used by the government in executing government activities. Contrastingly, the heads of court resolutions in 2017 declared English a lingua franca in South African courts. In a diverse country such as South Africa with twelve official languages, this raises critical concerns in terms of the country’s diversity, inclusivity, and multilingualism policies. With a distinct focus on Eastern Cape legal courts, this study examines the constitutional linguistic rights on the use of English as a lingua franca in South African courts system. The study adopted a qualitative research approach embedded within the exploratory-explanatory research design. The data was obtained from secondary sources, which in this context are judicial precedents. To analyse the collected data, close-reading and thematic content analysis techniques were adopted. The findings of the study exhibit English as a language of power and access in law, this positions African languages at the periphery, limiting their development and incorporation in legalese. Also, the use of English as a lingua franca in the Eastern Cape courts contravenes the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. This study submits that legal practitioners and linguists should critically explore, language studies to bridge the knowledge gap.  Additionally, the government should create channels which allow the practical use of African languages in the court of law.                                                                                                                                             

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i4.39250 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

An exploratory study of stakeholder perceptions of the new directions necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic and their importance for the management of work-integrated learning

Thobekile Ndhlovu · Jane Skinner · Smangele Moyane

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly disrupted traditional Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) practices in South African Universities of Technology (UoTs), necessitating rapid adaptation to virtual, hybrid, and project-based learning models. This study investigates post-COVID WIL practices, stakeholder perceptions, curriculum impacts, and the effectiveness of newly implemented strategies. Situated within an interpretivist paradigm, a qualitative approach was adopted to explore the meanings participants ascribe to WIL experiences. An exploratory multiple case-study design enabled in-depth insights across six UoTs. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with 27 participants; including lecturers, WIL coordinators, and document analysis to capture diverse perspectives and institutional artefacts. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and managed in NVivo; thematic analysis combining deductive and inductive coding was applied to generate categories, subthemes, and overarching themes aligned to the research objectives. Thematic analysis revealed four overarching dimensions: (1) current WIL practices, including communication strategy development, traditional placements, project-based learning, and collaborative mentorship; (2) stakeholders’ perceptions, highlighting opportunities and constraints in transitioning to online and hybrid modalities; (3) curriculum impacts, reflecting both enhanced work-readiness and systemic limitations such as misaligned placements, insufficient exposure, and financial inequities; and (4) a balanced assessment of WIL strategies, emphasizing the integration of virtual approaches, simulation technologies, traditional placements, and industry partnerships. The main findings demonstrate that hybrid, adaptive WIL models supported by structured mentorship, formalised industry collaboration, and reflective practices optimally cultivate employable, competent, and resilient graduates. The study underscores the need for strategic planning, institutional capacity building, and equity-focused interventions to sustain WIL effectiveness in post-pandemic higher education

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i4.50080 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The role of cooperative membership in improving global value chain participation among smallholder maize farmers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa

Aneza Madini · Thembalethu Macdonald Seti

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Maize serves as South Africa's principal staple crop; yet, smallholder farmers in the Eastern Cape encounter persistent obstacles, such as low productivity and restricted market access. Cooperatives are often advocated to enhance livelihoods and facilitate farmers' integration into global value chains, however their efficacy remains contentious. This study investigates the impact of cooperative membership on maize market participation. A multi-stage stratified random sample of 200 farmers, comprising both cooperative members and non-members, was drawn from towns having functioning maize cooperatives. Data were collected via pre-tested questionnaires and analysed using a probit logistic regression model that accounts for socioeconomic and institutional variables. The findings demonstrate that cooperative participation exerts a substantial influence (β = 1.485, p = 0.102). Nonetheless, it lacks statistical significance at conventional thresholds. This indicates that although cooperative membership may enhance the probability of participating in formal markets, it does not ensure substantial involvement independently. Conversely, variables such as education, income, and employment position serve as more robust markers of engagement. The study indicates that while cooperatives promote collective action, it is essential to enhance governance, digital inclusion, and institutional support to enable effective integration into global value chains.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i4.45360 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Socio-economic determinants of smallholder maize farmers’ participation in global value chains in South Africa

Aneza Madini · Thembalethu Macdonald Seti

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Smallholder agriculture is crucial for sustaining rural livelihoods across South Africa; nevertheless, involvement in global value chains (GVCs) is still restricted. This study examines the socio-economic determinants affecting the incorporation of smallholder maize farmers into global value chains in the Eastern Cape, a region marked by significant rural poverty and dependence on agriculture. The study evaluates the engagement levels of 200 farmers by a cross-sectional survey and multinomial logistic regression analysis. Findings indicate that elevated education levels and income substantially enhance the probability of moderate involvement in value chains; yet, no farmers attained complete participation owing to institutional impediments, including the absence of export permits. These findings indicate that human characteristics alone are inadequate; structural barriers are also essential. The report advocates for structural reforms, particularly those aimed at enhancing education, broadening market access, and eliminating licensing obstacles, to foster inclusive and sustainable participation of smallholder farmers in global value chains.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.45210 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Building capacity for research data management services in institutions of higher learning: A systematic literature review

Janine Lockhart · Michael Twum-Darko

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The study examines RDM practices implemented at universities by specifically focussing on RDM services provided by academic libraries, highlighting how the research data lifecycle informs the design of these services, which in turn shape the jobs, roles, skills and competencies required, while also emphasising the need for ongoing skills development as RDM practices evolve. It pursues an interpretivist philosophy and takes a qualitative approach by conducting a systematic literature review. The reviewer used the Scopus and Web of Science databases from 2020 to 2024 and applied specific pre-defined search terms, inclusion/exclusion criteria and the PRISMA 2020 flowchart to maintain methodological standards.  The findings identified 40 RDM services and classified them thematically based on how often they occurred, providing a guide for institutions to design, prioritise, and coordinate their service offerings. The analysis highlighted low RDM professional competencies and skills, training, and RDM professional training programs, which can guide professional development to build capacity. Also, some lifecycles of RDM were criticized, and changes to the Research Data Lifecycle were proposed, supporting better integration of RDM services alignment.  This research offers a detailed and practical breakdown of RDM activities and their people requirements, which furthers the discussion on RDM service provision. The research also fills the gap in RDM capacity development discourse by clarifying an institutional approach. It focuses on developing skills and adopting best practices in RDM in academic libraries. It also proposes additions to the research data lifecycle.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.49080 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Examining the constitutional linguistic rights on the use of English as a lingua franca in South African courts system

Sandile Dike · Lutendo Nendauni

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, grants all official languages parity of esteem and equal treatment. The Constitution also recognises injustices of the past and historical diminished use of indigenous (African) languages. It is against this backdrop that this democratic constitution calls-upon the national and provincial government to take practical and positive measures in encouraging the use and elevation of the status of African languages. In advocating for these languages, the Constitution declares that a minimum of two official languages be used by the government in executing government activities. Contrastingly, the heads of court resolutions in 2017 declared English a lingua franca in South African courts. In a diverse country such as South Africa with twelve official languages, this raises critical concerns in terms of the country’s diversity, inclusivity, and multilingualism policies. With a distinct focus on Eastern Cape legal courts, this study examines the constitutional linguistic rights on the use of English as a lingua franca in South African courts system. The study adopted a qualitative research approach embedded within the exploratory-explanatory research design. The data was obtained from secondary sources, which in this context are judicial precedents. To analyse the collected data, close-reading and thematic content analysis techniques were adopted. The findings of the study exhibit English as a language of power and access in law, this positions African languages at the periphery, limiting their development and incorporation in legalese. Also, the use of English as a lingua franca in the Eastern Cape courts contravenes the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. This study submits that legal practitioners and linguists should critically explore, language studies to bridge the knowledge gap.  Additionally, the government should create channels which allow the practical use of African languages in the court of law.                                                                                                                                             

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i4.39250 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

An exploratory study of stakeholder perceptions of the new directions necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic and their importance for the management of work-integrated learning

Thobekile Ndhlovu · Jane Skinner · Smangele Moyane

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly disrupted traditional Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) practices in South African Universities of Technology (UoTs), necessitating rapid adaptation to virtual, hybrid, and project-based learning models. This study investigates post-COVID WIL practices, stakeholder perceptions, curriculum impacts, and the effectiveness of newly implemented strategies. Situated within an interpretivist paradigm, a qualitative approach was adopted to explore the meanings participants ascribe to WIL experiences. An exploratory multiple case-study design enabled in-depth insights across six UoTs. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with 27 participants; including lecturers, WIL coordinators, and document analysis to capture diverse perspectives and institutional artefacts. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and managed in NVivo; thematic analysis combining deductive and inductive coding was applied to generate categories, subthemes, and overarching themes aligned to the research objectives. Thematic analysis revealed four overarching dimensions: (1) current WIL practices, including communication strategy development, traditional placements, project-based learning, and collaborative mentorship; (2) stakeholders’ perceptions, highlighting opportunities and constraints in transitioning to online and hybrid modalities; (3) curriculum impacts, reflecting both enhanced work-readiness and systemic limitations such as misaligned placements, insufficient exposure, and financial inequities; and (4) a balanced assessment of WIL strategies, emphasizing the integration of virtual approaches, simulation technologies, traditional placements, and industry partnerships. The main findings demonstrate that hybrid, adaptive WIL models supported by structured mentorship, formalised industry collaboration, and reflective practices optimally cultivate employable, competent, and resilient graduates. The study underscores the need for strategic planning, institutional capacity building, and equity-focused interventions to sustain WIL effectiveness in post-pandemic higher education

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i4.50080 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The role of cooperative membership in improving global value chain participation among smallholder maize farmers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa

Aneza Madini · Thembalethu Macdonald Seti

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Maize serves as South Africa's principal staple crop; yet, smallholder farmers in the Eastern Cape encounter persistent obstacles, such as low productivity and restricted market access. Cooperatives are often advocated to enhance livelihoods and facilitate farmers' integration into global value chains, however their efficacy remains contentious. This study investigates the impact of cooperative membership on maize market participation. A multi-stage stratified random sample of 200 farmers, comprising both cooperative members and non-members, was drawn from towns having functioning maize cooperatives. Data were collected via pre-tested questionnaires and analysed using a probit logistic regression model that accounts for socioeconomic and institutional variables. The findings demonstrate that cooperative participation exerts a substantial influence (β = 1.485, p = 0.102). Nonetheless, it lacks statistical significance at conventional thresholds. This indicates that although cooperative membership may enhance the probability of participating in formal markets, it does not ensure substantial involvement independently. Conversely, variables such as education, income, and employment position serve as more robust markers of engagement. The study indicates that while cooperatives promote collective action, it is essential to enhance governance, digital inclusion, and institutional support to enable effective integration into global value chains.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i4.45360 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Socio-economic determinants of smallholder maize farmers’ participation in global value chains in South Africa

Aneza Madini · Thembalethu Macdonald Seti

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Smallholder agriculture is crucial for sustaining rural livelihoods across South Africa; nevertheless, involvement in global value chains (GVCs) is still restricted. This study examines the socio-economic determinants affecting the incorporation of smallholder maize farmers into global value chains in the Eastern Cape, a region marked by significant rural poverty and dependence on agriculture. The study evaluates the engagement levels of 200 farmers by a cross-sectional survey and multinomial logistic regression analysis. Findings indicate that elevated education levels and income substantially enhance the probability of moderate involvement in value chains; yet, no farmers attained complete participation owing to institutional impediments, including the absence of export permits. These findings indicate that human characteristics alone are inadequate; structural barriers are also essential. The report advocates for structural reforms, particularly those aimed at enhancing education, broadening market access, and eliminating licensing obstacles, to foster inclusive and sustainable participation of smallholder farmers in global value chains.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.45210 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Building capacity for research data management services in institutions of higher learning: A systematic literature review

Janine Lockhart · Michael Twum-Darko

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The study examines RDM practices implemented at universities by specifically focussing on RDM services provided by academic libraries, highlighting how the research data lifecycle informs the design of these services, which in turn shape the jobs, roles, skills and competencies required, while also emphasising the need for ongoing skills development as RDM practices evolve. It pursues an interpretivist philosophy and takes a qualitative approach by conducting a systematic literature review. The reviewer used the Scopus and Web of Science databases from 2020 to 2024 and applied specific pre-defined search terms, inclusion/exclusion criteria and the PRISMA 2020 flowchart to maintain methodological standards.  The findings identified 40 RDM services and classified them thematically based on how often they occurred, providing a guide for institutions to design, prioritise, and coordinate their service offerings. The analysis highlighted low RDM professional competencies and skills, training, and RDM professional training programs, which can guide professional development to build capacity. Also, some lifecycles of RDM were criticized, and changes to the Research Data Lifecycle were proposed, supporting better integration of RDM services alignment.  This research offers a detailed and practical breakdown of RDM activities and their people requirements, which furthers the discussion on RDM service provision. The research also fills the gap in RDM capacity development discourse by clarifying an institutional approach. It focuses on developing skills and adopting best practices in RDM in academic libraries. It also proposes additions to the research data lifecycle.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.49080 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →