CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 2/2 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 08:02 UTC
PUBLICATIONS2In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS22/2 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS22/2 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN1.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 2 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: University of South Africa Remove ×topic: Education Systems and Policy Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of South Africa22/2 records with data

Countries

South Africa22/2 records with data

Primary topics

Education Systems and Policy22/2 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 2/2 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T08:02:07.973854+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
2 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS2
CROSSREF CITATIONS2
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS50.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.0

Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS2
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%2 / 2 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.02 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.0

Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 05:38 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 08:02 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations11–516–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Countries

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Primary topics

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T05:38:10.444376+00:00 — 2026-10-22T08:02:07.973854+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 2/22025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 2/2 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications022/2
2018All selected publications022/2
2019All selected publications022/2
2020All selected publications022/2
2021All selected publications022/2
2022All selected publications022/2
2023All selected publications022/2
2024All selected publications122/2
2025All selected publications022/2
2026All selected publications122/2

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean1.0
Median1.0
No citations11–516–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
1001/10.000.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
1221/12.02100.01/1 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 2 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Why TVET colleges are not attractive places of higher learning for South African high school learners?

Zamandlovu Makola · Itumeleng Dube · Ramodungoane Tabane

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

Annually, South African universities experience an overwhelming number of learners who are interested in enrolling with them because they are viewed as more appealing post-secondary school study options compared to technical and vocational education and training (TVET) colleges. Therefore, it is important to understand high school learners’ views of TVET colleges so that the issue of oversubscription at universities can be addressed and ensure TVET colleges are a favourable option for learners. In South Africa, most studies investigating TVET colleges as study options involve samples primarily of students already enrolled at TVET colleges. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate high school learners’ views on TVET colleges as a study option after high school. A qualitative study was conducted in which data was collected using a qualitative questionnaire from a sample of 42 high school learners from Grades 10, 11, and 12. Three themes were constructed from the data: the pull factors, the push factors, and the expectations of TVET colleges. Several misconceptions and expectations about TVETs were identified. As most studies used TVET students as study samples, the findings in this study have implications for TVET colleges as they provide insights into the perspectives of South African high school learners and how TVET colleges need to market themselves as viable study options.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i8.27322 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Structural and pedagogical challenges in South African rural TVET colleges: A case of the Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal and Limpopo provinces

Tandiwe Mdlungu

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges serve as crucial gateways for South African youth who are unable to access universities due to capacity limitations, financial barriers, or entry requirements. For many rural students, TVET colleges are not just a second choice but the only post-school option available. However, increasing evidence suggests that structural, pedagogical, and governance issues within certain TVET colleges compromise their ability to produce quality, employable graduates. This qualitative study examines systemic challenges that impact teaching quality, lecturer accountability, the language of instruction, admission practices, and student support in rural South African TVET colleges. Drawing on policy documents, academic research, parliamentary reports, and media investigations, the paper examines how these issues perpetuate inequality rather than alleviate it. Special focus is placed on the exclusionary effects of English-only instruction, lecturer oversight, inadequate support systems, dubious recruitment practices, and the admission of under-prepared students into technically demanding programs. The findings identify five interconnected themes that collectively impair graduate employability and student achievement. The study argues that without immediate reforms in lecturer training, accountability systems, and admission standards, TVET colleges risk becoming mere holding institutions instead of pathways to meaningful employment. The paper concludes by recommending stronger oversight, adaptable pedagogy tailored to local contexts, and governance centered on equity, ensuring that TVET colleges fulfil their developmental role in rural South Africa.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i2.11520 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Structural and pedagogical challenges in South African rural TVET colleges: A case of the Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal and Limpopo provinces

Tandiwe Mdlungu

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges serve as crucial gateways for South African youth who are unable to access universities due to capacity limitations, financial barriers, or entry requirements. For many rural students, TVET colleges are not just a second choice but the only post-school option available. However, increasing evidence suggests that structural, pedagogical, and governance issues within certain TVET colleges compromise their ability to produce quality, employable graduates. This qualitative study examines systemic challenges that impact teaching quality, lecturer accountability, the language of instruction, admission practices, and student support in rural South African TVET colleges. Drawing on policy documents, academic research, parliamentary reports, and media investigations, the paper examines how these issues perpetuate inequality rather than alleviate it. Special focus is placed on the exclusionary effects of English-only instruction, lecturer oversight, inadequate support systems, dubious recruitment practices, and the admission of under-prepared students into technically demanding programs. The findings identify five interconnected themes that collectively impair graduate employability and student achievement. The study argues that without immediate reforms in lecturer training, accountability systems, and admission standards, TVET colleges risk becoming mere holding institutions instead of pathways to meaningful employment. The paper concludes by recommending stronger oversight, adaptable pedagogy tailored to local contexts, and governance centered on equity, ensuring that TVET colleges fulfil their developmental role in rural South Africa.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i2.11520 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Why TVET colleges are not attractive places of higher learning for South African high school learners?

Zamandlovu Makola · Itumeleng Dube · Ramodungoane Tabane

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

Annually, South African universities experience an overwhelming number of learners who are interested in enrolling with them because they are viewed as more appealing post-secondary school study options compared to technical and vocational education and training (TVET) colleges. Therefore, it is important to understand high school learners’ views of TVET colleges so that the issue of oversubscription at universities can be addressed and ensure TVET colleges are a favourable option for learners. In South Africa, most studies investigating TVET colleges as study options involve samples primarily of students already enrolled at TVET colleges. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate high school learners’ views on TVET colleges as a study option after high school. A qualitative study was conducted in which data was collected using a qualitative questionnaire from a sample of 42 high school learners from Grades 10, 11, and 12. Three themes were constructed from the data: the pull factors, the push factors, and the expectations of TVET colleges. Several misconceptions and expectations about TVETs were identified. As most studies used TVET students as study samples, the findings in this study have implications for TVET colleges as they provide insights into the perspectives of South African high school learners and how TVET colleges need to market themselves as viable study options.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i8.27322 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →