Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
View data & coverage
Citations received each year
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
OpenAlex
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
Annual history: 2/2 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-23T06:56:30.818614+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side
Compare journals
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
Publications
Articles by publication year
View data & coverage
Crossref citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex · Citations received
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
View data & coverage
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
OpenAlex / Separate citation source
A broader view of this research
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
OPENALEX CITATIONS25
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%2 / 2 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY12.52 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY12.5
Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 04:34 UTC — 23 Oct 2026 06:56 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
Institutions
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
Publications
View publications data & coverage
Publication year
Journal / scope
Publications
Publications
Crossref known
OpenAlex known
2017
All selected publications
1
1
1/1
1/1
2018
All selected publications
0
0
0/0
0/0
2019
All selected publications
0
0
0/0
0/0
2020
All selected publications
0
0
0/0
0/0
2021
All selected publications
1
1
1/1
1/1
Crossref citations
View crossref citations data & coverage
Publication year
Journal / scope
Crossref citations
Publications
Crossref known
OpenAlex known
2017
All selected publications
8
1
1/1
1/1
2018
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2019
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2020
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2021
All selected publications
3
1
1/1
1/1
OpenAlex citations
View openalex citations data & coverage
Publication year
Journal / scope
OpenAlex citations
Publications
Crossref known
OpenAlex known
2017
All selected publications
17
1
1/1
1/1
2018
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2019
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2020
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2021
All selected publications
8
1
1/1
1/1
Citation year / OpenAlex
Citations received over time
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T04:34:01.274277+00:00 — 2026-10-23T06:56:30.818614+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
OpenAlex · Citations received by year
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation year
Journal / scope
OpenAlex · Citations received by year
Publications
Annual history known
2017
All selected publications
1
2
2/2
2018
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2019
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2020
All selected publications
4
2
2/2
2021
All selected publications
1
2
2/2
2022
All selected publications
7
2
2/2
2023
All selected publications
4
2
2/2
2024
All selected publications
4
2
2/2
2025
All selected publications
3
2
2/2
2026
All selected publications
1
2
2/2
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
<p>Operational risk threatens banks financial viability and long-term sustainability. The purpose of this paper is to explore the effect of operational risk on financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. The qualitative research design and ordered logistic model were employed. The data was analysed with the aid of STATA software. The conclusion of the study was that there exists an inverse relationship between operational risk and financial performance. The study also finds that bank size moderates the effect internal and external fraud on financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya by shrinking it. Bank size moderates the effect execution, delivery and process management on financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya by enhancing it. The guidelines and procedures provided by the Central bank of Kenya on operational risk management should be fully adhered into.</p>
Liquidity risk is the potential that an entity will be unable to acquire the cash required to meet its short and intermediate-term obligations. Deposit-taking Savings and Credit Cooperative Organisation (SACCOs) face liquidity risk when they are unable to fund their operations and lending requirements to their members as and when circumstances demand. Given that liquidity is a key phenomenon on the optimal functioning and financial performance of deposit-taking SACCOs, this study critically analyzed the effect of liquidity risk on the financial performance of DT SACCOs in Kenya. The study used a descriptive survey design and employed regression methods to model the relationship between liquidity risk and financial performance of DT SACCOs. The data were analyzed at a 5% level of significance. The study findings revealed that at a 5% level of significance, liquidity risk had a statistically significant influence on the financial performance of deposit-taking SACCOs. Basing on the findings, DT SACCOs are encouraged to focus on enhancing the mobilization of deposits to ensure that an asset portfolio that minimizes liquidity risk is maintained.
Liquidity risk is the potential that an entity will be unable to acquire the cash required to meet its short and intermediate-term obligations. Deposit-taking Savings and Credit Cooperative Organisation (SACCOs) face liquidity risk when they are unable to fund their operations and lending requirements to their members as and when circumstances demand. Given that liquidity is a key phenomenon on the optimal functioning and financial performance of deposit-taking SACCOs, this study critically analyzed the effect of liquidity risk on the financial performance of DT SACCOs in Kenya. The study used a descriptive survey design and employed regression methods to model the relationship between liquidity risk and financial performance of DT SACCOs. The data were analyzed at a 5% level of significance. The study findings revealed that at a 5% level of significance, liquidity risk had a statistically significant influence on the financial performance of deposit-taking SACCOs. Basing on the findings, DT SACCOs are encouraged to focus on enhancing the mobilization of deposits to ensure that an asset portfolio that minimizes liquidity risk is maintained.
<p>Operational risk threatens banks financial viability and long-term sustainability. The purpose of this paper is to explore the effect of operational risk on financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. The qualitative research design and ordered logistic model were employed. The data was analysed with the aid of STATA software. The conclusion of the study was that there exists an inverse relationship between operational risk and financial performance. The study also finds that bank size moderates the effect internal and external fraud on financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya by shrinking it. Bank size moderates the effect execution, delivery and process management on financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya by enhancing it. The guidelines and procedures provided by the Central bank of Kenya on operational risk management should be fully adhered into.</p>