CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 2/2 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
PUBLICATIONS2In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS62/2 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS82/2 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN4.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 2 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya Remove ×topic: Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya22/2 records with data

Countries

Indonesia22/2 records with data

Primary topics

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior22/2 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 2/2 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:22:53.438168+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
2 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS2
CROSSREF CITATIONS6
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS100.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS3.0

Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS8
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%2 / 2 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY4.02 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY4.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations01–526–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Countries

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Primary topics

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:48.089839+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:22:53.438168+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

42.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 4 · Annual history coverage 2/22025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 2/22026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 2/2 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications022/2
2018All selected publications022/2
2019All selected publications022/2
2020All selected publications022/2
2021All selected publications022/2
2022All selected publications022/2
2023All selected publications022/2
2024All selected publications422/2
2025All selected publications322/2
2026All selected publications122/2

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean3.0
Median3.0
No citations01–526–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
2682/23.03.0100.02/2 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 2 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Person-job fit on work engagement with meaningful work as mediator

Netty Merdiaty

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

This study examines the relationship between person-job fit and employee engagement with mediator meaningful work of regional bank employees in Indonesia. A survey questionnaire was administered to employees in bank regions across different departments, with 205 respondents comprising 164 men, 80%, and 41 women, or 20%. Statistical techniques with a partial least square structural equation model (PLS-SEM 3.3.3) will be used to analyze the relationships and test the mediation effect of Meaningful Work on the relationships between Person Job Fit and Work Engagement. The study's findings demonstrated that Job Person Fit, which is the suitability of self-value with each job given, employees understanding the goals to be achieved in their work, and demand-abilities fit, including knowledge, skills, and personalities, were responsible for specific variations in work-related outcomes. Work engagement can be directly impacted by Job-person fit and indirectly by Meaningful work. Understanding these linkages may help employers design jobs and responsibilities that better fit their workforce's skills, preferences, and values, eventually resulting in a happier and more engaged workforce.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i1.31464 Crossref citations5 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The effect of organisational commitment to organisational citizenship behaviour through meaningful work as a mediator

Netty Merdiaty · Athala Insyrania Putri · Wustari L. Mangundjaya

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

Few empirical studies have examined the connections between employees’ commitment and organizational citizenship behaviors to the company. Also, not much is known about how a specific part of meaningful work affects the organization’s citizenship behaviour of people who work as travel agents. Our study examines whether meaningful work mediates an organization’s commitment to organizational citizenship behaviour. The research is quantitative with descriptive methods, and 104 participants participated. The scales were available online, and they filled them out. Statistical analysis uses the PLS structural equation model to test the model. The main finding of the study demonstrates that (i) There is no relationship between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behaviour shown in the statistical result is 0.055, (ii) the Statistical result of 0.826 between organization commitment to meaningful work shows that there is a direct link between two variables (iii) and there is the link is between meaningful work and organizational citizenship behaviour with the statistical result is 0.814, (iv)  From this point on, the structural equation model shows that meaningful work is the only difference between organizational commitment and citizenship behaviour with P-Value 0.000. The study has shown that meaningful work as a full mediator can help organizational citizenship behaviour. Organizational commitment and citizenship behaviors are related and reinforced by meaningful work.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.25172 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Person-job fit on work engagement with meaningful work as mediator

Netty Merdiaty

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

This study examines the relationship between person-job fit and employee engagement with mediator meaningful work of regional bank employees in Indonesia. A survey questionnaire was administered to employees in bank regions across different departments, with 205 respondents comprising 164 men, 80%, and 41 women, or 20%. Statistical techniques with a partial least square structural equation model (PLS-SEM 3.3.3) will be used to analyze the relationships and test the mediation effect of Meaningful Work on the relationships between Person Job Fit and Work Engagement. The study's findings demonstrated that Job Person Fit, which is the suitability of self-value with each job given, employees understanding the goals to be achieved in their work, and demand-abilities fit, including knowledge, skills, and personalities, were responsible for specific variations in work-related outcomes. Work engagement can be directly impacted by Job-person fit and indirectly by Meaningful work. Understanding these linkages may help employers design jobs and responsibilities that better fit their workforce's skills, preferences, and values, eventually resulting in a happier and more engaged workforce.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i1.31464 Crossref citations5 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The effect of organisational commitment to organisational citizenship behaviour through meaningful work as a mediator

Netty Merdiaty · Athala Insyrania Putri · Wustari L. Mangundjaya

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

Few empirical studies have examined the connections between employees’ commitment and organizational citizenship behaviors to the company. Also, not much is known about how a specific part of meaningful work affects the organization’s citizenship behaviour of people who work as travel agents. Our study examines whether meaningful work mediates an organization’s commitment to organizational citizenship behaviour. The research is quantitative with descriptive methods, and 104 participants participated. The scales were available online, and they filled them out. Statistical analysis uses the PLS structural equation model to test the model. The main finding of the study demonstrates that (i) There is no relationship between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behaviour shown in the statistical result is 0.055, (ii) the Statistical result of 0.826 between organization commitment to meaningful work shows that there is a direct link between two variables (iii) and there is the link is between meaningful work and organizational citizenship behaviour with the statistical result is 0.814, (iv)  From this point on, the structural equation model shows that meaningful work is the only difference between organizational commitment and citizenship behaviour with P-Value 0.000. The study has shown that meaningful work as a full mediator can help organizational citizenship behaviour. Organizational commitment and citizenship behaviors are related and reinforced by meaningful work.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.25172 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →