CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 62/62 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC
PUBLICATIONS62In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS11259/62 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS21662/62 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN3.48Per article with a known count
Explore articles 62 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of Brawijaya9Huazhong University of Science and Technology5University of South Africa459/62 records with data

Countries

Indonesia20South Africa20China959/62 records with data

Primary topics

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting6262/62 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 62/62 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:23:04.053910+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
62 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS62
CROSSREF CITATIONS112
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS59.3%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.9

Crossref citation coverage: 59 / 62 publications (95.2%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS216
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%62 / 62 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3.4862 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations221–5286–20921+3Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

59 / 62 with data · 3 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 62 selected publications.

University of Brawijaya9 14.5%Huazhong University of Science and Technology5 8.1%University of South Africa4 6.5%Durban University of Technology4 6.5%North-West University4 6.5%University of Johannesburg3 4.8%University of KwaZulu-Natal3 4.8%University of International Business and Economics2 3.2%Universitas Jember2 3.2%I-Shou University2 3.2%Universitas Kristen Indonesia1 1.6%Women's University in Africa1 1.6%Ahmadu Bello University1 1.6%Southwest University of Political Science & Law1 1.6%Gopalganj Science and Technology University1 1.6%Bandung Institute of Technology1 1.6%Universitas Jambi1 1.6%Bindura University of Science Education1 1.6%Universitas Syiah Kuala1 1.6%Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University1 1.6%Kaduna State University1 1.6%Istanbul Medipol University1 1.6%University of Barishal1 1.6%Islamic University of Indonesia1 1.6%Prague University of Economics and Business1 1.6%Northwest University1 1.6%Central China Normal University1 1.6%Bangladesh Bank1 1.6%Ibn Haldun University1 1.6%Jagannath University1 1.6%Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang1 1.6%The Independent Institute of Education1 1.6%Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta1 1.6%Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta1 1.6%State University of New York at Oswego1 1.6%Politeknik Negeri Bali1 1.6%Universitas Dharma AUB Surakarta1 1.6%Maltepe University1 1.6%Midlands State University1 1.6%University of Venda1 1.6%Bangladesh University of Textiles1 1.6%Telkom University1 1.6%Bucharest University of Economic Studies1 1.6%University of Chittagong1 1.6%Walter Sisulu University1 1.6%Gazi University1 1.6%Macquarie University1 1.6%

Countries

59 / 62 with data · 3 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 62 selected publications.

Primary topics

62 / 62 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 62 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 62 / 62 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:14:28.501287+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:04.053910+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

4924.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 4 · Annual history coverage 62/622018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 5 · Annual history coverage 62/622019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 13 · Annual history coverage 62/622020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 62/622021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 12 · Annual history coverage 62/622022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 17 · Annual history coverage 62/622023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 26 · Annual history coverage 62/622024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 47 · Annual history coverage 62/622025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 49 · Annual history coverage 62/622026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 27 · Annual history coverage 62/62 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications46262/62
2018All selected publications56262/62
2019All selected publications136262/62
2020All selected publications66262/62
2021All selected publications126262/62
2022All selected publications176262/62
2023All selected publications266262/62
2024All selected publications476262/62
2025All selected publications496262/62
2026All selected publications276262/62

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean1.9
Median1
No citations241–5316–20421+0Unknown3

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
1451114/140.360.021.414/14 · 100.0%
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
1183011/111.01.062.58/11 · 72.7%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
379917537/372.68173.037/37 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 62 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influence of CSR stakeholders on the textile firms performances

Md. Nurun Nabi · Mst. Marium Akter · Ahashan Habib · Abdullah Al Masud

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

Ready-made garments (RMG) are one of the most critical sectors in the economy of the South Asian region in terms of the labor force employed and export earnings. This research study aims to determine the Corporate Social Responsibility Stakeholders dimension and its influence on textile firms Performance. The study used organizational legitimacy as mediating variable between the CSR stakeholders and firms’ performances. The research study was used in the quantitative analysis approach to determine the cause and effect of the relationship between CSR and Textile firm’s financial and non-financial performance. Though the study collected primary data & secondary data from 250 respondents using survey questionnaires, the researcher obtained secondary data by analyzing the audited annual and sustainability reports of various RMG companies. We have collected data by conducting a focus group interview forming a team of employers, top-level managers, and CSR officers. We asked them all the questions, filled it, tapped it, reserved it for the interpretations. We have surveyed 67 industries, but it enabled us to collect the data from the 50 sectors—the data collected from 2016 April to 2018 December. Our study has some limitations in that the sample size is small compared to the other research. SPSS-23 & MS-Excel were used to analyze the collected data. CSR practices benefitted RMG companies in terms of long-term sustainable development by increasing the firm’s financial and non-financial performance of the RMG sector.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i8.150214 Crossref citations18 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Effects of ESG issues on investment decision through corporate reputation: Individual investors’ perspective

Nafisa Rounok · Aimin Qian · Mohammad Ashraful Alam

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

Whether investors take into account a company's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues when making investment decisions (ID), how they interpret corporate reputation (CR) as a result of ESG issues, and whether CR mediates the relationship between ESG issues and ID are the goals of this study. The theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the signaling theory are the bases of the framework. The study was based on a questionnaire survey that received 599 responses from active retail investors in two Bangladeshi cities, Dhaka and Chattagram. The PLS path modeling method was used to analyze the data and test the hypothesis. The empirical findings reveal that corporate ESG issues considerably impact ID and that CR mediates this relationship. This study contributes to behavioral finance by offering empirical proof of the relationship between company ESG issues and investment decisions. By examining the indirect effects of ESG issues on ID via CR, this study contributes to the body of knowledge. It is therefore advised that strategic managers be required to use ESG practices as it builds reputation. At the same time, the government should create public policies, orders, and rules for upholding the ESG issues that contribute to the sustainable development of the capital market and the economy.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.235413 Crossref citations21 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Environmental and Social Disclosures

Ali Altuğ Biçer · Imad Mohamed Feneir

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

The main reasons for corporate participation in environmental and social disclosure are stability, development, and continuity through participation in protecting the environment and optimizing the use of available resources. As well as the company practices and participation in society of the most important means to create a good image of the company in the community. There is a rise demand for companies to take accountability for their environmental and societal impacts. A core role of the Audit Committee (AC) is to help the board of directors in overseeing the company's reporting policy and oversees the quality of financial reporting in the company. This study examined the impact of audit committee characteristics on the level of environmental and social disclosures in listed banks in Borsa Istanbul. The results of the study showed that there is no statistically significant relationship between the characteristics of the audit committee and the environmental and social disclosures. Consequently, these characteristics have no effect on the volume or type of disclosure and their inability to predict them.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i3.26213 Crossref citations21 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sustainable investing drive by ESG performance

Etty Indriani

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

ESGs, or sustainable business practices, are becoming more and more popular as more stakeholders, regulators, and investors want to conduct business in a way that helps address urgent global issues like environmental degradation, climate change, ethical supply chains, and global well-being. Consequently, while making investment decisions, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors are given more weight in the operational and strategic objectives of the organization. The purpose of this research is to determine the relationship between a company's financial success and market value and its environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. This research uses financial performance as a mediating impact and integrates the risk mitigation element, which is the foundation of sustainability. Data from publicly traded businesses on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with ESG risk from Sustainalytics and ESG ratings from Refinitiv were used in the study. Purposive sampling was the sampling approach utilized to acquire 48 observation firms for empirical testing. The results indicate that only the individual environmental ESG score has a positive and significant impact on financial performance and company value, whereas the composite ESG score has a positive and substantial impact on financial performance. The finding of this study is that the improvement of corporate ESG performance can increase corporate value, and corporate financial performance provides an obvious mediating effect. The findings further show that low-risk ESG scores have an impact on increasing firm value with financial performance as the mediation.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i3.32879 Crossref citations9 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring the relationship between ESG performance and firm value in Chinese and US banks

Changjun Zheng · Md Abdul Mannan Khan · Changjun Zheng · Rabiul Islam

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

This paper explores the relationship between environmental, social, and governance performance (ESGP) and firm value in both emerging and developed economies, with the moderating impact of environmental uncertainty and competitive advantage. Using secondary unbalanced data spanning from 2011 to 2022, we examine both the direct and non-linear effects of ESG performance on firm value, employing advanced econometric estimation techniques such as two-step system GMM (2sGMM) and two-stage least square (2SLS). The analysis finds that: (1) ESG performance positively influences firm value in both Chinese and US banks, and the results remain valid after robustness test; (2) The results also confirm that ESG performance non-linearly influence firm value across the samples, with an inverted U-shape relationship; (3) Additionally, we further investigate the moderating effects of environmental uncertainty and competitive advantage, uncovering that environmental uncertainty dampens the ESGP-firm value relationship, while competitive advantage further amplifies it. This study contributes to the understanding of how ESG performance can act as strategic assets that align managerial and stakeholder interests, and improve firm performance, by underpinning agency, stakeholder, and the resource-based view theory. Practical insights are also provided for policymakers, regulators, and financial institutions regarding the use of ESGP as a competitive tool in uncertain and dynamic market environments.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i1.39995 Crossref citations5 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Assessing the Perceived Effect of the Environmental Dimension of Corporate Sustainability Reporting on Performance of Quoted Firms in Zimbabwe

Linda Magodlyo · Emmanuel Mutambara · Makumbe William

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The study examines how environmental sustainability reporting influences the performance of listed construction firms in Zimbabwe. The study responds to a notable research gap in developing economies, particularly within the construction sector, where limited qualitative evidence exists on how managers perceive the relationship between environmental corporate sustainability practices and organisational performance. While prior studies have largely focused on quantitative approaches in developed contexts, this paper adopts a qualitative perspective to generate context-specific insights. Guided by the interpretivist philosophy and informed by Signalling Theory and Legitimacy Theory, the study employed a qualitative research design using purposive sampling. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, and document analysis of sustainability reports from selected firms listed on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange. The data were analysed through thematic and content analysis to identify recurring patterns and perceptions. The findings indicate that environmental sustainability reporting is generally perceived to enhance firm performance through improved corporate reputation, stronger stakeholder confidence, regulatory compliance, operational efficiency, waste reduction, and better resource management. Key environmental practices identified include environmental management systems, recycling and reuse initiatives, pollution control measures, land rehabilitation, and water conservation strategies. However, the study also found that firms face constraints such as resource limitations, economic instability, and uneven regulatory enforcement, which may hinder the full benefits of environmental sustainability initiatives. The paper concludes that the environmental dimension of corporate sustainability reporting can contribute positively to organisational performance when supported by effective implementation and strategic commitment. It recommends that listed firms strengthen environmental governance systems, integrate sustainability into core business strategy, invest in cleaner technologies, and improve disclosure quality. Policymakers are encouraged to enhance regulatory support and industry guidance for sustainability reporting. Future research may extend this inquiry to other sectors, compare listed and non-listed firms, and explore longitudinal changes in sustainability reporting practices across emerging markets.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.13700 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices on Corporate Financial Performance in the Mining Sector of Zimbabwe

Chosani Simon · Gamuchirai Charuka

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices on corporate financial performance in Zimbabwe's mining sector using a case study of Zimplats Holdings Limited. The main aim was to determine whether and to what extent ESG practices contribute to financial outcomes at the firm level. The objective of the study was to examine the overall ESG and financial performance relationship, to analyse the effects of individual ESG dimensions on financial performance, and to assess the moderating role of firm-specific factors on ESG practices. Informed by the stakeholder theory, the resource-based view, and legitimacy theory, a quantitative approach was adopted, using secondary data extracted from Zimplats' Integrated Annual Reports (2023–2025) through a structured data extraction template aligned with GRI standards. Key findings reveal a positive but lagged ESG and financial performance relationship. Governance emerged as the most stable and financially material ESG pillar, while environmental and social investments showed transitional efficiency deterioration before expected long-term gains. Firm-specific factors such as asset expansion, capital structure, production volume, and multinational ownership, significantly moderated the timing and magnitude of financial returns, compressing short-term profitability indicators such as return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). The study contributes firm-level empirical evidence on unlisted Zimbabwean mining firms, extending ESG theory to emerging market contexts. Recommendations include targeting governance enhancements for immediate financial returns, allowing longer investment horizons for environmental and social initiatives, and maintaining conservative capital structures to sustain ESG investment during earnings volatility.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.14670 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

ESG Disclosure Quality in Nigerian Banks: A Conceptual and Measurement Framework

Dodo, Ibrahim Ahmed · Yusuf, Hawwa

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2026

Read abstract

This paper aims to develop a conceptual and measurement framework for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure quality in Nigerian banks. It also aims to demonstrate how ESG disclosure quality can be distinguished from ESG disclosure quantity, ESG performance, ESG practices, ESG ratings and sustainability reporting. We employed a conceptual review and framework development approach by synthesising stakeholder theory, institutional theory, Nigerian sustainable banking regulation, international sustainability reporting standards and related banking literature. The materials analysed include the CBN Sustainable Banking Principles, SEC Sustainable Financial Principles, NGX Sustainability Disclosure Guidelines, Nigeria’s IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards adoption roadmap, IFRS S1/S2, GRI, TCFD, PCAF, the Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision and literature on ESG disclosure, banking risk, financial stability and disclosure quality. The main findings of the study demonstrate that: (i) ESG disclosure quality is a distinct construct; and (ii) bank ESG disclosure quality should be assessed across environmental, social and governance dimensions. The paper proposes the ESG Disclosure Quality Index framework which provides a graded 0–5 scoring scale and three empirical model specifications for future panel data studies. The framework provides a basis for assessing ESG disclosure quality and examining its relationship with bank-level outcomes in Nigeria and comparable emerging market banking systems.               

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v15i3.5274N/A Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Corporate Social Responsibility Awards, Corporate Cash-Holdings and Investment Decisions: Evidence from Non-Financial FTSE100 Firms

Apergis, Nicholas

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2026

Read abstract

Using Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) scores compiled by the Boost Awards international company for 77 UK companies listed on the FTSE100, the paper explores the impact of CSR on companies’ cash and investment decisions. The analysis is based on the system-GMM estimation methodology, spanning the period 2006 to 2023. The empirical analysis provides direct evidence that suggests that CSR award is directly and positively associated with corporate cash holdings, with such awards also having a positive effect on corporate investment decisions. The findings survive certain robustness tests in relevance to the distinction between mature and growth firms, although they are stronger in the case of the growth firms, and an alternative definition of CSR. The findings are highly important for company managers, investors and regulatory authorities. Managers in awarded CSR firms with better investment opportunities hold more cash because financial distress is more costly for their firms. In addition, firms with more cash holdings are less likely to default on their financial obligations, hence this evidence also implies that investors may give priority to invest in such high-performance CSR firms. Regulatory authorities should also consider that CSR activities enhance value of firms’ cash holdings and improve stakeholders’ relations.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v15i2.5119N/A Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Carbon Emission Disclosure, Capital Structure, and Intellectual Capital: The Impact on Corporate Value with Financial Performance as a Moderating Variable

Rifaldy Yoga Pratama · Gunarsih, Tri

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2026

Read abstract

This study aims to assess the impact of exposure to Carbon Emission Disclosure (CED) and the level of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions on the valuation of companies operating in the Indonesian banking sector. This in-depth study also evaluates the influence of capital structure and intellectual property assets. In addition, this study explicitly examines how financial performance moderates the relationship between these variables and the company's value. Using a quantitative research method, this analysis observed a sample consisting of banking entities listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2020 to 2024. The theoretical framework underpinning this research comprises Legitimacy Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Signal Theory, Preference Order Theory, and the resource-based view (RBV). The results reveal that transparent disclosure of carbon emissions and the accumulation of intellectual capital positively influence the company's value, while GHG emissions and leverage have adverse effects. Crucially, financial performance (ROA) moderates these relationships by weakening the positive impact of carbon disclosure and buffering the negative impact of GHG emissions but does not significantly moderate the effects of capital structure or intellectual capital. These findings offer practical guidelines for banking management to align environmental sustainability practices with financial strategies to enhance corporate value.  

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v15i1.4875N/A Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →