CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 3/3 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 02:51 UTC
PUBLICATIONS3In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS03/3 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS03/3 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 3 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Healthcare Systems and Reforms Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Central University of Technology1North-West University1University of Venda13/3 records with data

Countries

South Africa33/3 records with data

Primary topics

Healthcare Systems and Reforms33/3 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 3/3 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T02:51:16.291561+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
3 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS3
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%3 / 3 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.03 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 02:51 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations31–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Countries

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Primary topics

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:14:32.827584+00:00 — 2026-10-22T02:51:16.291561+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/3 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications033/3
2018All selected publications033/3
2019All selected publications033/3
2020All selected publications033/3
2021All selected publications033/3
2022All selected publications033/3
2023All selected publications033/3
2024All selected publications033/3
2025All selected publications033/3
2026All selected publications033/3

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0
No citations31–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
3003/30.000.03/3 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 3 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Social Determinants on Health Care Service Delivery in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: The Corollary of Institutional Failures

Xolisile Ngumbela

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Amidst the strategic priorities of any government is the strengthening of public service delivery to citizens, the developmental state to more effectively serve the needs of the people and act as a driving force for socio-economic transformation and upliftment. The key priority in this regard is the strengthening of healthcare service delivery for a healthy citizenry, ensuring more efficient and caring service delivery. The purpose of this research report is to outline the challenges faced by the Eastern Cape Province in delivering quality services to the people of the Eastern Cape in the Health department. The objectives of the study were to provide and ensure accessible comprehensive integrated quality health services in the Eastern Cape, emphasis is on the primary health care approach, optimally utilizing all resources to enable all its present and future generations to enjoy health and quality of life. Although the Eastern Cape delivery of health is facing a myriad of challenges it is however pleasing to note that it’s in line with the implementation of the National Development Plan, the Medium-Term Strategic Framework (2014-2019), the Minister’s Negotiated Service Delivery Agreement (NSDA), National Health Council Priorities. Although the province is failing to fully provide quality health service in so far as Maternal Children’s and Women’s Health (MCWH) package, if the number of reported medico-legal cases from the province is anything to go by promotion of a better life for all is seemingly becoming a pipe dream. The research which was conducted throughout the province looking at the performance enablers in the form of social determinants of health qualitatively and quantitatively looked at the service delivery points and the infrastructure to determine Improvements on the quality and continuum of primary healthcare. However, from the results of the study it is clear that the Province is still managing to reduce morbidity and mortality due to communicable diseases and non-communicable illnesses and conditions by implementing high impact strategies to address prevention, detection, management and support at all levels of care despite the corollary of both institutional failures and Apartheid legacy.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12630 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Public administration and the national health insurance policy in South Africa

Tlangelani Ngobeni · Ephraim Mahole · Mutshutshu Michael Nekhavhambe

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The successful implementation of the National Health Insurance (NHI) policy in South Africa depends largely on the effectiveness of public administration systems. Therefore, this study examines the importance of public administration in translating NHI policy objectives into practical outcomes. Guided by the Institutional Theory, the study explore how administrative capacity, coordination and institutional structures influence policy implementation. This study adopts a theoretical approach. The analysis relies on existing literature, government reports, policy documents, and case studies of countries that have implemented national health insurance systems. The findings reveal that weak administrative capacity, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and fragmented coordination, poor finances, and lack of engagement continue to undermine the realization of universal health coverage. These institutional constraints illustrate how organizational pressures and systematic weakness affect the delivery of public health reforms. The study contributes to policy discourse by highlighting that strengthening administrative capacity and implementing institutional reforms are essential for improving the effectiveness of NHI. It recommends targeted training, enhanced interdepartmental coordination, and streamlined decision-making process to ensure efficient policy implementation.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i6.9600 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Impact of the national health insurance on private healthcare providers in South Africa: disruption or partnership?

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025

Read abstract

South Africa's National Health Insurance (NHI) initiative represents a profound policy shift aimed at achieving universal health coverage and reducing healthcare disparities. Central to this reform is the creation of a single, publicly funded healthcare system designed to integrate both public and private providers. This paper interrogates whether the NHI will disrupt private healthcare providers or enable synergistic partnerships that enhance national health outcomes. Drawing upon policy documents, legal evaluations, industry submissions, and expert analyses, the article explores the evolving interface between the public and private sectors under the NHI. Core thematic areas include regulatory realignment, financial restructuring, operational integration, legal implications, and collaborative opportunities. The findings reveal a dual trajectory: disruption manifests through constrained revenues, heightened administrative demands, and diminished autonomy, while opportunities emerge in the form of “contracting-in” models and integrated service delivery. The study concludes that the long-term impact of the NHI on private healthcare hinges on the coherence of policy design, the inclusivity of stakeholder engagement, and the resilience of institutional governance. A well-executed partnership framework can preserve the strengths of private healthcare while advancing equitable and efficient national health objectives.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.8680 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Social Determinants on Health Care Service Delivery in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: The Corollary of Institutional Failures

Xolisile Ngumbela

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Amidst the strategic priorities of any government is the strengthening of public service delivery to citizens, the developmental state to more effectively serve the needs of the people and act as a driving force for socio-economic transformation and upliftment. The key priority in this regard is the strengthening of healthcare service delivery for a healthy citizenry, ensuring more efficient and caring service delivery. The purpose of this research report is to outline the challenges faced by the Eastern Cape Province in delivering quality services to the people of the Eastern Cape in the Health department. The objectives of the study were to provide and ensure accessible comprehensive integrated quality health services in the Eastern Cape, emphasis is on the primary health care approach, optimally utilizing all resources to enable all its present and future generations to enjoy health and quality of life. Although the Eastern Cape delivery of health is facing a myriad of challenges it is however pleasing to note that it’s in line with the implementation of the National Development Plan, the Medium-Term Strategic Framework (2014-2019), the Minister’s Negotiated Service Delivery Agreement (NSDA), National Health Council Priorities. Although the province is failing to fully provide quality health service in so far as Maternal Children’s and Women’s Health (MCWH) package, if the number of reported medico-legal cases from the province is anything to go by promotion of a better life for all is seemingly becoming a pipe dream. The research which was conducted throughout the province looking at the performance enablers in the form of social determinants of health qualitatively and quantitatively looked at the service delivery points and the infrastructure to determine Improvements on the quality and continuum of primary healthcare. However, from the results of the study it is clear that the Province is still managing to reduce morbidity and mortality due to communicable diseases and non-communicable illnesses and conditions by implementing high impact strategies to address prevention, detection, management and support at all levels of care despite the corollary of both institutional failures and Apartheid legacy.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12630 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Public administration and the national health insurance policy in South Africa

Tlangelani Ngobeni · Ephraim Mahole · Mutshutshu Michael Nekhavhambe

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The successful implementation of the National Health Insurance (NHI) policy in South Africa depends largely on the effectiveness of public administration systems. Therefore, this study examines the importance of public administration in translating NHI policy objectives into practical outcomes. Guided by the Institutional Theory, the study explore how administrative capacity, coordination and institutional structures influence policy implementation. This study adopts a theoretical approach. The analysis relies on existing literature, government reports, policy documents, and case studies of countries that have implemented national health insurance systems. The findings reveal that weak administrative capacity, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and fragmented coordination, poor finances, and lack of engagement continue to undermine the realization of universal health coverage. These institutional constraints illustrate how organizational pressures and systematic weakness affect the delivery of public health reforms. The study contributes to policy discourse by highlighting that strengthening administrative capacity and implementing institutional reforms are essential for improving the effectiveness of NHI. It recommends targeted training, enhanced interdepartmental coordination, and streamlined decision-making process to ensure efficient policy implementation.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i6.9600 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Impact of the national health insurance on private healthcare providers in South Africa: disruption or partnership?

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025

Read abstract

South Africa's National Health Insurance (NHI) initiative represents a profound policy shift aimed at achieving universal health coverage and reducing healthcare disparities. Central to this reform is the creation of a single, publicly funded healthcare system designed to integrate both public and private providers. This paper interrogates whether the NHI will disrupt private healthcare providers or enable synergistic partnerships that enhance national health outcomes. Drawing upon policy documents, legal evaluations, industry submissions, and expert analyses, the article explores the evolving interface between the public and private sectors under the NHI. Core thematic areas include regulatory realignment, financial restructuring, operational integration, legal implications, and collaborative opportunities. The findings reveal a dual trajectory: disruption manifests through constrained revenues, heightened administrative demands, and diminished autonomy, while opportunities emerge in the form of “contracting-in” models and integrated service delivery. The study concludes that the long-term impact of the NHI on private healthcare hinges on the coherence of policy design, the inclusivity of stakeholder engagement, and the resilience of institutional governance. A well-executed partnership framework can preserve the strengths of private healthcare while advancing equitable and efficient national health objectives.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.8680 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbescomplete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbescomplete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:02 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:49 UTC · ijbescomplete · ijbes · 20 Oct 2026 19:48 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbescomplete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
Full import history & methodology →