Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:14:32.165486+00:00 — 2026-10-21T00:14:34.373792+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 |
| 2026 | 1 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy Bussecon International Academy | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2/2 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Artificial intelligence has infiltrated various industries and workplaces. The application has been examined from two primary perspectives concerning threats and opportunities for enhanced job performance. Research indicates that AI can serve as both a disruptor in the job market by replacing human roles and as a facilitator for improved productivity and work performance. This study aimed to analyse final year students' perspectives on AI, considering it either as a threat to job market entry or as an opportunity for enhanced work performance. The study utilised a quantitative research approach, employing a Likert-type questionnaire for data collection and analysing descriptive statistics to meet its objectives. Data were collected from 200 final-year students selected from five faculties at a University of Technology. The data analysis revealed that students exhibited diverse perspectives on AI. They perceive it as a threat to job market entry and work performance; however, they also acknowledge potential benefits for enhanced work performance that can be derived from AI. The results were inconclusive regarding the significance of each perspective. Further research is necessary to determine the significance of threats to job market entry and the opportunities for improved work performance related to AI.
Academic advising is essential in equipping students for their careers, particularly in specialized fields such as Management Accounting, where alignment with industry expectations is critical. This study investigates the effectiveness of academic advising in enhancing the career readiness of Management Accounting students at the Durban University of Technology (DUT) in South Africa. Employing a quantitative research approach, data was collected from 33 students through structured surveys, focusing on key components of advising, including skill development, job market insights, mentorship, and employability support. The findings reveal that academic advising plays a significant role in fostering students’ understanding of essential professional skills, career planning, and industry trends. Students expressed high satisfaction regarding advising related to course selection and resume preparation, achieving a mean score of 4.03 (SD = 0.810) for the impact of advising on skill development. However, lower mean scores in areas such as internship opportunities (3.61, SD = 1.223) and interview preparation (3.67, SD = 1.051) indicate existing gaps in connecting theoretical knowledge with practical work experience. Furthermore, the study identifies demographic variations in advising effectiveness, with Generation Z students showing a preference for digital career resources, while female students expressed the necessity for gender-sensitive career support. Although the study highlights the overall positive impact of academic advising, it emphasizes the need for enhancements to better align with industry expectations. Recommendations include incorporating experiential learning, strengthening mentorship programs, expanding digital advising resources, and fostering partnerships between industry and academia. These improvements will ensure that students not only excel in their academic pursuits but also transition smoothly into professional roles. The study contributes to the broader dialogue on higher education and employability by providing insights into the evolving role of academic advising in preparing graduates for the workforce.
Artificial intelligence has infiltrated various industries and workplaces. The application has been examined from two primary perspectives concerning threats and opportunities for enhanced job performance. Research indicates that AI can serve as both a disruptor in the job market by replacing human roles and as a facilitator for improved productivity and work performance. This study aimed to analyse final year students' perspectives on AI, considering it either as a threat to job market entry or as an opportunity for enhanced work performance. The study utilised a quantitative research approach, employing a Likert-type questionnaire for data collection and analysing descriptive statistics to meet its objectives. Data were collected from 200 final-year students selected from five faculties at a University of Technology. The data analysis revealed that students exhibited diverse perspectives on AI. They perceive it as a threat to job market entry and work performance; however, they also acknowledge potential benefits for enhanced work performance that can be derived from AI. The results were inconclusive regarding the significance of each perspective. Further research is necessary to determine the significance of threats to job market entry and the opportunities for improved work performance related to AI.
Academic advising is essential in equipping students for their careers, particularly in specialized fields such as Management Accounting, where alignment with industry expectations is critical. This study investigates the effectiveness of academic advising in enhancing the career readiness of Management Accounting students at the Durban University of Technology (DUT) in South Africa. Employing a quantitative research approach, data was collected from 33 students through structured surveys, focusing on key components of advising, including skill development, job market insights, mentorship, and employability support. The findings reveal that academic advising plays a significant role in fostering students’ understanding of essential professional skills, career planning, and industry trends. Students expressed high satisfaction regarding advising related to course selection and resume preparation, achieving a mean score of 4.03 (SD = 0.810) for the impact of advising on skill development. However, lower mean scores in areas such as internship opportunities (3.61, SD = 1.223) and interview preparation (3.67, SD = 1.051) indicate existing gaps in connecting theoretical knowledge with practical work experience. Furthermore, the study identifies demographic variations in advising effectiveness, with Generation Z students showing a preference for digital career resources, while female students expressed the necessity for gender-sensitive career support. Although the study highlights the overall positive impact of academic advising, it emphasizes the need for enhancements to better align with industry expectations. Recommendations include incorporating experiential learning, strengthening mentorship programs, expanding digital advising resources, and fostering partnerships between industry and academia. These improvements will ensure that students not only excel in their academic pursuits but also transition smoothly into professional roles. The study contributes to the broader dialogue on higher education and employability by providing insights into the evolving role of academic advising in preparing graduates for the workforce.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbes | complete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbes | complete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:02 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:49 UTC · ijbes | complete · ijbes · 20 Oct 2026 19:48 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbes | complete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC |