Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 01:26 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 04:30 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All selected publications | 5 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All selected publications | 5 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T01:26:55.649309+00:00 — 2026-10-22T04:30:06.854706+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 5 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1 |
| 2025 | 1 |
| 2026 | 1 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy Bussecon International Academy | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3/3 | 1.67 | 0 | 33.3 | 3/3 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Advancements in science and technology has resulted in substantial transformations inside society. The telecommunications sector has established cyberspace, a virtual domain for online communication, data exchange, and digital interactions. This platform enables individuals to interact and cultivate relationships worldwide, fostering a sense of proximity despite geographical separation. Nonetheless, these improvements provide concerns, since there has been an increase in cyber victimisation via cyberspace, the internet, computer networks, and online systems. Criminals are progressively utilising these technologies to perpetrate illicit actions, endangering individuals, governments, organisations, and institutions.This study analyses the evaluation of cyber policies for regulating, monitoring, and supervising cyberspace activities, along with the implementation of cybersecurity measures to address technologically advanced crime. A mixed methods strategy, including qualitative and quantitative methodologies, was employed for data collecting. The research revealed that although cyberspace provides avenues for social contact, idea exchange, information dissemination, commercial transactions, and additional activities, it remains susceptible to cyber threats including ransomware, fraud, warfare, terrorism, trafficking, and breaches of privacy. Formulating cyber regulations to regulate actions in cyberspace is crucial for efficient law enforcement, alongside the establishment of a cybersecurity framework to safeguard critical cyber systems and bolster security protocols across several sectors. To safeguard both the public and private sectors against cybersecurity risks, it is essential to create and execute plans. These tactics encompass the regular evaluation and auditing of security systems, investment in cybersecurity training programs, maintenance of current systems, formulation and rehearsal of incident response plans, and dissemination of information among experts and professionals.
This article examines how illegal online gambling platforms stress-test South Africa's cyber-enforcement capacity and evaluates the South African Police Service's (SAPS) operational readiness to enforce the National Gambling Act against digitally mediated and often offshore operators. The study pursues four objectives: (1) to assess SAPS's investigative capacity and procedural readiness in cyber-enabled gambling cases; (2) to map the practical enforcement pathway from detection and digital evidence collection to prosecution; (3) to identify recurring operational bottlenecks and jurisdictional obstacles; and (4) to propose targeted measures that align gambling regulation with cybercrime enforcement tools. The study employs a qualitative desktop-based research design incorporating doctrinal legal analysis, a structured scoping review of the literature, and a documentary synthesis of publicly available regulatory communications, policy documents, and court materials. The thematic synthesis of legal, regulatory, and academic sources indicates four persistent enforcement challenges: limited specialist skills in cyber investigations and digital forensics; fragmented coordination among SAPS, gambling regulators, internet service providers, and financial intermediaries; difficulties associated with jurisdiction and cross-border cooperation where platforms operate offshore; and procedural limitations in responding to rapidly evolving technologies. The reviewed literature further suggests that these challenges contribute to inconsistent case development, delays in evidence preservation and attribution, and reduced prosecutorial effectiveness against sophisticated operators. The article argues that strengthening specialist investigative capacity, improving digital evidence procedures, enhancing inter-agency information sharing, and more effectively utilising the Cybercrimes Act alongside gambling legislation could strengthen cyber-enforcement efforts. Collectively, these measures may help reduce the enforcement gap and improve SAPS's ability to address illegal online gambling within an increasingly complex digital environment.
The growing number of cybercriminals impersonating religious leaders and institutions for financial gain poses a serious threat to the integrity and economic security of religious groups, notably prominent Pentecostal ministries. This study thoroughly investigates and evaluates this phenomenon, focusing on cybercriminals' tactics, the scope of their actions, and the consequences for targeted religious communities and people. The study applies a complete desktop research technique to analyse hackers' use of religious leaders' identities for financial benefit, focusing on Pentecostal ministries. This strategy includes searching academic databases, reading cybersecurity and religious studies journals, and analysing documented cases. The findings show that cybercriminals are primarily driven by financial gain and use strategies including building phoney social media pages, phishing techniques, and compromising communication lines to impersonate religious groups and scam congregants. This study contributes to developing more effective defences against cyber fraud in religious contexts by evaluating religious institutions' responses and mitigation techniques, as well as law enforcement. This project intends to develop more effective techniques for preventing and combating cyber-fraud against religious bodies through an in-depth examination.
This article examines how illegal online gambling platforms stress-test South Africa's cyber-enforcement capacity and evaluates the South African Police Service's (SAPS) operational readiness to enforce the National Gambling Act against digitally mediated and often offshore operators. The study pursues four objectives: (1) to assess SAPS's investigative capacity and procedural readiness in cyber-enabled gambling cases; (2) to map the practical enforcement pathway from detection and digital evidence collection to prosecution; (3) to identify recurring operational bottlenecks and jurisdictional obstacles; and (4) to propose targeted measures that align gambling regulation with cybercrime enforcement tools. The study employs a qualitative desktop-based research design incorporating doctrinal legal analysis, a structured scoping review of the literature, and a documentary synthesis of publicly available regulatory communications, policy documents, and court materials. The thematic synthesis of legal, regulatory, and academic sources indicates four persistent enforcement challenges: limited specialist skills in cyber investigations and digital forensics; fragmented coordination among SAPS, gambling regulators, internet service providers, and financial intermediaries; difficulties associated with jurisdiction and cross-border cooperation where platforms operate offshore; and procedural limitations in responding to rapidly evolving technologies. The reviewed literature further suggests that these challenges contribute to inconsistent case development, delays in evidence preservation and attribution, and reduced prosecutorial effectiveness against sophisticated operators. The article argues that strengthening specialist investigative capacity, improving digital evidence procedures, enhancing inter-agency information sharing, and more effectively utilising the Cybercrimes Act alongside gambling legislation could strengthen cyber-enforcement efforts. Collectively, these measures may help reduce the enforcement gap and improve SAPS's ability to address illegal online gambling within an increasingly complex digital environment.
The growing number of cybercriminals impersonating religious leaders and institutions for financial gain poses a serious threat to the integrity and economic security of religious groups, notably prominent Pentecostal ministries. This study thoroughly investigates and evaluates this phenomenon, focusing on cybercriminals' tactics, the scope of their actions, and the consequences for targeted religious communities and people. The study applies a complete desktop research technique to analyse hackers' use of religious leaders' identities for financial benefit, focusing on Pentecostal ministries. This strategy includes searching academic databases, reading cybersecurity and religious studies journals, and analysing documented cases. The findings show that cybercriminals are primarily driven by financial gain and use strategies including building phoney social media pages, phishing techniques, and compromising communication lines to impersonate religious groups and scam congregants. This study contributes to developing more effective defences against cyber fraud in religious contexts by evaluating religious institutions' responses and mitigation techniques, as well as law enforcement. This project intends to develop more effective techniques for preventing and combating cyber-fraud against religious bodies through an in-depth examination.
Advancements in science and technology has resulted in substantial transformations inside society. The telecommunications sector has established cyberspace, a virtual domain for online communication, data exchange, and digital interactions. This platform enables individuals to interact and cultivate relationships worldwide, fostering a sense of proximity despite geographical separation. Nonetheless, these improvements provide concerns, since there has been an increase in cyber victimisation via cyberspace, the internet, computer networks, and online systems. Criminals are progressively utilising these technologies to perpetrate illicit actions, endangering individuals, governments, organisations, and institutions.This study analyses the evaluation of cyber policies for regulating, monitoring, and supervising cyberspace activities, along with the implementation of cybersecurity measures to address technologically advanced crime. A mixed methods strategy, including qualitative and quantitative methodologies, was employed for data collecting. The research revealed that although cyberspace provides avenues for social contact, idea exchange, information dissemination, commercial transactions, and additional activities, it remains susceptible to cyber threats including ransomware, fraud, warfare, terrorism, trafficking, and breaches of privacy. Formulating cyber regulations to regulate actions in cyberspace is crucial for efficient law enforcement, alongside the establishment of a cybersecurity framework to safeguard critical cyber systems and bolster security protocols across several sectors. To safeguard both the public and private sectors against cybersecurity risks, it is essential to create and execute plans. These tactics encompass the regular evaluation and auditing of security systems, investment in cybersecurity training programs, maintenance of current systems, formulation and rehearsal of incident response plans, and dissemination of information among experts and professionals.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbes | complete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbes | complete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:02 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:49 UTC · ijbes | complete · ijbes · 20 Oct 2026 19:48 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbes | complete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC |