CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 5/5 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
PUBLICATIONS5In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS95/5 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS75/5 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN1.4Per article with a known count
Explore articles 5 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Economic Growth and Development Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of South Africa3North-West University3Botho University15/5 records with data

Countries

South Africa4Botswana15/5 records with data

Primary topics

Economic Growth and Development55/5 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 5/5 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T00:14:37.135256+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
5 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS5
CROSSREF CITATIONS9
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS40.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.8

Crossref citation coverage: 5 / 5 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS7
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%5 / 5 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.45 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations31–526–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Countries

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Primary topics

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 5 / 5 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:14:29.326932+00:00 — 2026-10-21T00:14:37.135256+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

52.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 5/52025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 5/52026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 5 · Annual history coverage 5/5 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications055/5
2018All selected publications055/5
2019All selected publications055/5
2020All selected publications055/5
2021All selected publications055/5
2022All selected publications055/5
2023All selected publications055/5
2024All selected publications155/5
2025All selected publications155/5
2026All selected publications555/5

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean1.8
Median0
No citations31–516–20121+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
5975/51.8040.05/5 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 5 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Financial development, institutional quality and economic growth in countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)

Strike Mbulawa · Samuel Chingoiro

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024

Read abstract

Over the years, there have been huge variations in the growth performances of the economies in SSA. Whilst these disparities can be attributed to a wide range of factors, it is generally understood that differences in their economic structures explain the capacity for generating growth and absorbing shocks during a recession. This study contributes to literature by examining the impact of institutional quality and financial development on economic growth in low- and middle-income countries. Data was obtained from the World Bank and covered the period from 1975 to 2020. The study employed an ARDL model to establish both short and long run dynamics in the two sub samples. The study confirmed both short and long run causality from financial and institutional quality to growth. Institutional quality enhances growth in both low- and middle-income countries in the long run. Whilst the direction of the impact is the same, the magnitude of the impact of institutional quality is different within the two categories. Institutional quality plays a more significant role in low-income countries compared to middle income economies. The study brings out potential financial fragility and systemic risks in financial institutions among countries in SSA. Policies that enhance the quality, consistency, and uniformity of legal reasoning in judicial decisions are ideal. Reducing the risk profile for investments may enhance the flow of credit to the private sector by financial institutions.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v6i1.4617 Crossref citations5 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Unlocking SME potential through digital platforms: insights from three African digital economies

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025

Read abstract

Digital platforms are reshaping the landscape for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) across Africa, offering innovative solutions to challenges in market access, financial inclusion, and operational efficiency. This study provides a comparative analysis of the role of digital platforms in supporting SME growth in Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa, three of the continent’s most digitally active economies. Drawing on secondary data from reputable sources, the research examines how mobile technologies, e-commerce, and fintech platforms influence SME outcomes in revenue, employment, and access to finance. The study further explores the enabling and constraining ecosystem conditions, such as digital infrastructure, literacy, and regulatory environments, that mediate platform effectiveness. The study shows that while all three countries exhibit measurable gains from platform adoption, the scale and sustainability of impact vary widely. Kenya shows significant advancement due to mobile-first innovation and proactive regulation. Nigeria demonstrates rapid but uneven progress shaped by informality and infrastructure gaps. South Africa benefits from advanced digital systems, yet faces persistent inclusion challenges in underserved communities. The study concludes with actionable policy recommendations to improve digital access, build inclusive ecosystems, and align national efforts with regional initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and the African Union’s Digital Transformation Strategy

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.8592 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Digital Transformation and Labour Productivity in SADC: Long-Run Effects and The Limits of Human-Capital Complementarity

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie · Emile Franc Doungmo Goufo

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines whether digital transformation is associated with higher labour productivity in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and whether the relationship strengthens with human capital. A fully open panel is constructed from World Development Indicators and Penn World Table 11.0 for 13 SADC economies over 2005-2023. Digitalisation is measured by the first principal component of internet use, mobile subscriptions and fixed broadband. The empirical strategy combines country fixed effects with Driscoll-Kraay covariance and a pooled dynamic common correlated effects error-correction model. Country-cluster bootstrap inference, an equal-weight digital index, sequential country deletion and threshold estimation provide robustness checks. The long-run digital coefficient is positive (0.239; 95% bootstrap interval [0.033, 0.425]), while the error-correction coefficient indicates stable annual adjustment (-0.566; interval [-0.820, -0.208]). The digitalisation-human-capital interaction is not supported (-0.041; interval [-0.102, 0.015]), and the threshold slope difference also includes zero. H2 is rejected for the aggregate PWT human-capital index, not for skills in general. The findings identify a durable average digital productivity premium without evidence that national education stocks automatically magnify it. Policy should combine reliable connectivity with targeted, use-specific capabilities and business-ecosystem coordination.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.15010 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Role of Institutions in Strengthening Digital Productivity Gains in SADC

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie · Emile Franc Doungmo Goufo

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

This paper tests whether government effectiveness and regulatory quality amplify the productivity return to digitalisation in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). A fully unrestricted panel combines World Development Indicators, the 2025 Worldwide Governance Indicators revision and Penn World Table 11.0 for 15 economies over 2005–2023. Digitalisation is a principal-component index of internet use, mobile subscriptions and fixed broadband. Separate governance equations avoid mechanical multicollinearity. Country fixed effects with Driscoll–Kraay covariance are compared with pooled dynamic common correlated effects error-correction models. Digitalisation has a positive short-run association in the government-effectiveness equation (0.056; 95% country-cluster interval: 0.008–0.155), while regulatory quality has a positive direct short-run coefficient (0.208; 0.064–0.309). Neither governance measure positively magnifies digital returns. Long-run interaction intervals include zero; the regulatory-quality short-run interaction is negative (−0.069; −0.123 to −0.004), and threshold slope differences are unsupported. Error correction is stable in both equations, and country deletion preserves positive digital coefficients. Institutions remain important direct capabilities, but broad governance scores should not be presumed automatic digital multipliers. Policy should connect specific regulatory and implementation reforms to identifiable adoption constraints rather than relying on general institutional upgrading alone.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.15000 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Institutional quality and digital financial Inclusion as complementary drivers of economic growth: A panel analysis of the SADC region

Collin Chikwira

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The study examines how institutional quality and digital financial inclusion influence economic growth in SADC from 2000 to 2022, using panel data from the World Bank and IMF. It applies fixed- and random-effects models, selecting the appropriate model via the Hausman test, and uses Driscoll–Kraay standard errors to address heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation, and cross-sectional dependence. The empirical results suggest that institutional quality, proxied by legal rights, has a positive and statistically significant impact on economic growth at the 5% level (β = 0.000231, p = 0.0348). In comparison, financial inclusion is also positive and significant at the 1% level (β = 0.02345, p = 0.0010). Notably, the findings provide evidence of a synergistic relationship between institutional quality and financial inclusion, in which improvements in governance frameworks strengthen the growth-promoting effects of financial inclusion. The overall model is statistically significant (Prob > F = 0.0475) and accounts for roughly 40% of the variation in economic growth. These findings suggest that isolated policy interventions are inadequate; rather, a coordinated ecosystem of governance and financial systems is necessary. Enhancing legal and regulatory institutions improves the efficacy of digital financial systems, consequently optimising resource allocation and fostering inclusive growth. The study advances the existing literature by offering region-specific evidence on the synergistic interaction between institutional quality and financial inclusion within a developing-country context. From a policy perspective, the findings emphasise the need for integrated strategies that simultaneously promote institutional reforms (e.g., the rule of law and regulatory quality) and expand digital financial infrastructure. Such complementarities are crucial for boosting regional competitiveness, encouraging financial deepening, and fostering sustainable economic growth in the SADC region.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i2.11740 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Digital Transformation and Labour Productivity in SADC: Long-Run Effects and The Limits of Human-Capital Complementarity

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie · Emile Franc Doungmo Goufo

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines whether digital transformation is associated with higher labour productivity in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and whether the relationship strengthens with human capital. A fully open panel is constructed from World Development Indicators and Penn World Table 11.0 for 13 SADC economies over 2005-2023. Digitalisation is measured by the first principal component of internet use, mobile subscriptions and fixed broadband. The empirical strategy combines country fixed effects with Driscoll-Kraay covariance and a pooled dynamic common correlated effects error-correction model. Country-cluster bootstrap inference, an equal-weight digital index, sequential country deletion and threshold estimation provide robustness checks. The long-run digital coefficient is positive (0.239; 95% bootstrap interval [0.033, 0.425]), while the error-correction coefficient indicates stable annual adjustment (-0.566; interval [-0.820, -0.208]). The digitalisation-human-capital interaction is not supported (-0.041; interval [-0.102, 0.015]), and the threshold slope difference also includes zero. H2 is rejected for the aggregate PWT human-capital index, not for skills in general. The findings identify a durable average digital productivity premium without evidence that national education stocks automatically magnify it. Policy should combine reliable connectivity with targeted, use-specific capabilities and business-ecosystem coordination.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.15010 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Role of Institutions in Strengthening Digital Productivity Gains in SADC

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie · Emile Franc Doungmo Goufo

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

This paper tests whether government effectiveness and regulatory quality amplify the productivity return to digitalisation in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). A fully unrestricted panel combines World Development Indicators, the 2025 Worldwide Governance Indicators revision and Penn World Table 11.0 for 15 economies over 2005–2023. Digitalisation is a principal-component index of internet use, mobile subscriptions and fixed broadband. Separate governance equations avoid mechanical multicollinearity. Country fixed effects with Driscoll–Kraay covariance are compared with pooled dynamic common correlated effects error-correction models. Digitalisation has a positive short-run association in the government-effectiveness equation (0.056; 95% country-cluster interval: 0.008–0.155), while regulatory quality has a positive direct short-run coefficient (0.208; 0.064–0.309). Neither governance measure positively magnifies digital returns. Long-run interaction intervals include zero; the regulatory-quality short-run interaction is negative (−0.069; −0.123 to −0.004), and threshold slope differences are unsupported. Error correction is stable in both equations, and country deletion preserves positive digital coefficients. Institutions remain important direct capabilities, but broad governance scores should not be presumed automatic digital multipliers. Policy should connect specific regulatory and implementation reforms to identifiable adoption constraints rather than relying on general institutional upgrading alone.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.15000 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Institutional quality and digital financial Inclusion as complementary drivers of economic growth: A panel analysis of the SADC region

Collin Chikwira

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The study examines how institutional quality and digital financial inclusion influence economic growth in SADC from 2000 to 2022, using panel data from the World Bank and IMF. It applies fixed- and random-effects models, selecting the appropriate model via the Hausman test, and uses Driscoll–Kraay standard errors to address heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation, and cross-sectional dependence. The empirical results suggest that institutional quality, proxied by legal rights, has a positive and statistically significant impact on economic growth at the 5% level (β = 0.000231, p = 0.0348). In comparison, financial inclusion is also positive and significant at the 1% level (β = 0.02345, p = 0.0010). Notably, the findings provide evidence of a synergistic relationship between institutional quality and financial inclusion, in which improvements in governance frameworks strengthen the growth-promoting effects of financial inclusion. The overall model is statistically significant (Prob > F = 0.0475) and accounts for roughly 40% of the variation in economic growth. These findings suggest that isolated policy interventions are inadequate; rather, a coordinated ecosystem of governance and financial systems is necessary. Enhancing legal and regulatory institutions improves the efficacy of digital financial systems, consequently optimising resource allocation and fostering inclusive growth. The study advances the existing literature by offering region-specific evidence on the synergistic interaction between institutional quality and financial inclusion within a developing-country context. From a policy perspective, the findings emphasise the need for integrated strategies that simultaneously promote institutional reforms (e.g., the rule of law and regulatory quality) and expand digital financial infrastructure. Such complementarities are crucial for boosting regional competitiveness, encouraging financial deepening, and fostering sustainable economic growth in the SADC region.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i2.11740 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Unlocking SME potential through digital platforms: insights from three African digital economies

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025

Read abstract

Digital platforms are reshaping the landscape for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) across Africa, offering innovative solutions to challenges in market access, financial inclusion, and operational efficiency. This study provides a comparative analysis of the role of digital platforms in supporting SME growth in Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa, three of the continent’s most digitally active economies. Drawing on secondary data from reputable sources, the research examines how mobile technologies, e-commerce, and fintech platforms influence SME outcomes in revenue, employment, and access to finance. The study further explores the enabling and constraining ecosystem conditions, such as digital infrastructure, literacy, and regulatory environments, that mediate platform effectiveness. The study shows that while all three countries exhibit measurable gains from platform adoption, the scale and sustainability of impact vary widely. Kenya shows significant advancement due to mobile-first innovation and proactive regulation. Nigeria demonstrates rapid but uneven progress shaped by informality and infrastructure gaps. South Africa benefits from advanced digital systems, yet faces persistent inclusion challenges in underserved communities. The study concludes with actionable policy recommendations to improve digital access, build inclusive ecosystems, and align national efforts with regional initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and the African Union’s Digital Transformation Strategy

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.8592 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Financial development, institutional quality and economic growth in countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)

Strike Mbulawa · Samuel Chingoiro

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024

Read abstract

Over the years, there have been huge variations in the growth performances of the economies in SSA. Whilst these disparities can be attributed to a wide range of factors, it is generally understood that differences in their economic structures explain the capacity for generating growth and absorbing shocks during a recession. This study contributes to literature by examining the impact of institutional quality and financial development on economic growth in low- and middle-income countries. Data was obtained from the World Bank and covered the period from 1975 to 2020. The study employed an ARDL model to establish both short and long run dynamics in the two sub samples. The study confirmed both short and long run causality from financial and institutional quality to growth. Institutional quality enhances growth in both low- and middle-income countries in the long run. Whilst the direction of the impact is the same, the magnitude of the impact of institutional quality is different within the two categories. Institutional quality plays a more significant role in low-income countries compared to middle income economies. The study brings out potential financial fragility and systemic risks in financial institutions among countries in SSA. Policies that enhance the quality, consistency, and uniformity of legal reasoning in judicial decisions are ideal. Reducing the risk profile for investments may enhance the flow of credit to the private sector by financial institutions.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v6i1.4617 Crossref citations5 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbescomplete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbescomplete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:02 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:49 UTC · ijbescomplete · ijbes · 20 Oct 2026 19:48 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC · ijbescomplete · ijbes · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
Full import history & methodology →