Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Publications
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
CiteNScope / Analytics
Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
OpenAlex coverage 99.2% · 472/476 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 10:53 UTC
PUBLICATIONS476In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS937476/476 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS2068472/476 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN4.38Per article with a known count
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Your research collection
Output and reach
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
OpenAlex
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
Research landscape
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Institutions
University of Prishtina10Universitas Widyatama8Istanbul Medipol University7360/476 records with dataPrimary topics
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency67Corporate Finance and Governance34Monetary Policy and Economic Impact29472/476 records with dataTwo perspectives on citations
Follow the research impact
Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Lifetime citations by publication year
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
View data & coverage
Citations received each year
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
OpenAlex
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
Annual history: 472/476 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T10:53:58.577106+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side
Compare journals
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
Publications
Articles by publication year
View data & coverage
Crossref citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex · Citations received
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
View data & coverage
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS476
CROSSREF CITATIONS937
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS56.3%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.97
Crossref citation coverage: 476 / 476 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
OpenAlex / Separate citation source
A broader view of this research
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
OPENALEX CITATIONS2068
DOI MATCH COVERAGE99.2%472 / 476 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY4.38472 known · 4 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.5
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 10:53 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
Institutions, countries & topics
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
Institutions
360 / 476 with data · 116 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 476 selected publications.
University of Prishtina10 2.1%Universitas Widyatama8 1.7%Istanbul Medipol University7 1.5%Telkom University7 1.5%University of Dhaka6 1.3%The Co-operative University of Kenya6 1.3%University of KwaZulu-Natal6 1.3%University of Port Harcourt5 1.1%Universitas Jambi5 1.1%Istanbul University5 1.1%Menlo College4 0.8%Poznań University of Economics and Business4 0.8%Public Authority for Applied Education and Training4 0.8%Kenyatta University4 0.8%Lebanese University4 0.8%University of South Africa4 0.8%IPB University4 0.8%Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology4 0.8%University of Kigali4 0.8%Islamic University of Indonesia4 0.8%Wichita State University4 0.8%Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta4 0.8%Politeknik Negeri Malang4 0.8%Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology4 0.8%University of Central Florida3 0.6%Universitas Trisakti3 0.6%University of the Witwatersrand3 0.6%University of Lagos3 0.6%University of Staffordshire3 0.6%Karatina University3 0.6%Krakow University of Economics3 0.6%Perbanas Institute3 0.6%Meru University of Science and Technology3 0.6%University of Barishal3 0.6%Varendra University3 0.6%Indian Institute of Management Indore3 0.6%Universiti Malaysia Sarawak3 0.6%Duhok Polytechnic University3 0.6%State University of New York at Oswego3 0.6%Ba Isago University3 0.6%Istanbul Commerce University3 0.6%University of Santo Tomas3 0.6%Beykent University3 0.6%State University of Malang2 0.4%Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah2 0.4%Tunis University2 0.4%Budapest University of Economics and Business2 0.4%Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona2 0.4%Cihan University-Erbil2 0.4%University of North Alabama2 0.4%Aichi University2 0.4%Southwest University of Political Science & Law2 0.4%Ekiti State University2 0.4%University of Cape Coast2 0.4%University of Sfax2 0.4%University of Liège2 0.4%University of Georgia2 0.4%Binus University2 0.4%Universidade de São Paulo2 0.4%Open University of Sri Lanka2 0.4%Taibah University2 0.4%Universitas Jember2 0.4%Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta2 0.4%Pan Africa Christian University2 0.4%Kenya Methodist University2 0.4%University for Business and Technology2 0.4%Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht2 0.4%RISEBA University of Applied Sciences2 0.4%Bangladesh Bank2 0.4%Middle Technical University2 0.4%American University of Ras Al Khaimah2 0.4%Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta2 0.4%University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica2 0.4%Cihan University - Duhok2 0.4%SBS Swiss Business School2 0.4%Xavier Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship2 0.4%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pancasetia2 0.4%Universitas Ekuitas Indonesia2 0.4%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia Surabaya2 0.4%Taita Taveta University2 0.4%Obafemi Awolowo University2 0.4%University of Benin2 0.4%Universiti Teknologi MARA2 0.4%University of Sousse2 0.4%University of Rajshahi2 0.4%Citadel2 0.4%Garden City University College2 0.4%University of Stavanger2 0.4%Macquarie University2 0.4%Yeditepe University1 0.2%Swiss German University1 0.2%University of Finance and Administration1 0.2%Claremont McKenna College1 0.2%Islamic Azad University, Tehran1 0.2%Kozminski University1 0.2%Great Zimbabwe University1 0.2%Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi1 0.2%Michigan Technological University1 0.2%Higher Colleges of Technology1 0.2%Gonzaga University1 0.2%National University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Hunan University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul1 0.2%Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University1 0.2%Udayana University1 0.2%Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi1 0.2%Akwa Ibom State University1 0.2%Bahçeşehir University1 0.2%Lampung University1 0.2%University of Nairobi1 0.2%Reserve Bank of India1 0.2%Pennsylvania State University1 0.2%University of Mons1 0.2%Islamic Azad University of Zanjan1 0.2%Tianjin University of Science and Technology1 0.2%National Bureau of Statistics of China1 0.2%Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology1 0.2%Anadolu University1 0.2%Central Bank of Brazil1 0.2%Bandung Institute of Technology1 0.2%University of Ghana1 0.2%Artvin Coruh University1 0.2%National Sun Yat-sen University1 0.2%Jimma University1 0.2%Amman Arab University1 0.2%Cairo University1 0.2%Ankara University1 0.2%Jagannath University1 0.2%Universidade de Brasília1 0.2%Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad1 0.2%Army Medical University1 0.2%Tarbiat Modares University1 0.2%Central Connecticut State University1 0.2%Tribhuvan University1 0.2%Edinboro University1 0.2%University of Botswana1 0.2%International Islamic University Chittagong1 0.2%Mzumbe University1 0.2%St. Augustine University of Tanzania1 0.2%Mangosuthu University of Technology1 0.2%Strathmore University1 0.2%Lake Forest College1 0.2%University of Douala1 0.2%University of Iceland1 0.2%Shiraz University1 0.2%Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1 0.2%University of New Mexico1 0.2%University of Alabama1 0.2%Wayamba University of Sri Lanka1 0.2%University of Brawijaya1 0.2%Lamar University1 0.2%Université de Dschang1 0.2%Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta1 0.2%Federal University of Technology1 0.2%Illinois Institute of Technology1 0.2%Lincoln University1 0.2%King Abdulaziz University1 0.2%Guangdong University of Foreign Studies1 0.2%Başkent University1 0.2%Zagazig University1 0.2%York University1 0.2%Majmaah University1 0.2%Utah Valley University1 0.2%Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University1 0.2%Akdeniz University1 0.2%Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey1 0.2%Université Paris Cité1 0.2%Harbin Institute of Technology1 0.2%Kingston University London1 0.2%Nnamdi Azikiwe University1 0.2%University of Nizwa1 0.2%Northern State University1 0.2%California State University, San Marcos1 0.2%Stockton University1 0.2%Kırklareli University1 0.2%University of Mines and Technology1 0.2%California State University Los Angeles1 0.2%Islamic Azad University, Isfahan1 0.2%Hitit Üniversitesi1 0.2%Konya Food and Agriculture University1 0.2%Kumasi Technical University1 0.2%Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology1 0.2%The University of Dodoma1 0.2%University of Central Missouri1 0.2%University of Energy and Natural Resources1 0.2%University of Indonesia1 0.2%Takming University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Budapest University of Technology and Economics1 0.2%Omar Al-Mukhtar University1 0.2%Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University1 0.2%Landmark University1 0.2%Bangladesh Air Force Shaheen College1 0.2%Pancasila University1 0.2%National University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Sol Plaatje University1 0.2%University of National Education1 0.2%Warmadewa University1 0.2%University of Benghazi1 0.2%Independent University, Bangladesh1 0.2%Nasarawa State University1 0.2%Tajen University1 0.2%Université du Québec en Outaouais1 0.2%Anna University, Chennai1 0.2%Nigerian Defence Academy1 0.2%Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte1 0.2%Universitas Halu Oleo1 0.2%University of Hyderabad1 0.2%University of Uyo1 0.2%University of Calabar1 0.2%Islamic University1 0.2%Yıldız Technical University1 0.2%Universitas Madura1 0.2%Universitas Tabanan1 0.2%Capital University of Science and Technology1 0.2%UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1 0.2%Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha1 0.2%Universitas Batam1 0.2%Lahore Garrison University1 0.2%Universitas Merdeka Malang1 0.2%Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember1 0.2%University of Buraimi1 0.2%Kigali Independent University1 0.2%Prime University1 0.2%Banco Central del Uruguay1 0.2%Institute for Systems Analysis1 0.2%Xinqiao Hospital1 0.2%Jagannath University1 0.2%Islamic Azad University Yasuj1 0.2%University of Science and Technology, Meghalaya1 0.2%East–West University1 0.2%Council for Scientific and Industrial Research1 0.2%Ministry of Finance1 0.2%Trilogi University1 0.2%Universiti Teknologi MARA System1 0.2%Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion1 0.2%Jumeira University1 0.2%Universitas Islam Malang1 0.2%Nile University of Nigeria1 0.2%Sampoerna University1 0.2%Forestry Research Institute of Ghana1 0.2%Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan1 0.2%Cihan University Sulaimaniya1 0.2%Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare1 0.2%Universitas Teknologi Bandung1 0.2%University of Derna1 0.2%Erbil Polytechnic University1 0.2%Tirana Business University1 0.2%National University of Battambang1 0.2%Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax1 0.2%ESOFT Uni1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN Yogyakarta1 0.2%Otoritas Jasa Keuangan1 0.2%Rowan University1 0.2%Maltepe University1 0.2%University of Florence1 0.2%Jahangirnagar University1 0.2%Mulawarman University1 0.2%Saint Louis University1 0.2%Christ University1 0.2%Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny1 0.2%Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne1 0.2%University of Bath1 0.2%Universidade Federal do Paraná1 0.2%Western Washington University1 0.2%Radford University1 0.2%Winona State University1 0.2%University of Ngaoundéré1 0.2%University of Duhok1 0.2%Middlesex University London1 0.2%University at Buffalo, State University of New York1 0.2%University of Sulaimani1 0.2%Universiti Malaysia Perlis1 0.2%De Montfort University1 0.2%Pakuan University1 0.2%Lead City University1 0.2%University of Detroit Mercy1 0.2%Makerere University1 0.2%University of Tabuk1 0.2%Coventry University1 0.2%Marmara University1 0.2%Premier University1 0.2%Adnan Menderes University1 0.2%Georgia Gwinnett College1 0.2%Tata Institute of Social Sciences1 0.2%Muğla University1 0.2%Stonehill College1 0.2%Erciyes University1 0.2%Metropolitan State University of Denver1 0.2%University of Gothenburg1 0.2%East West University1 0.2%Aalborg University1 0.2%University of Chittagong1 0.2%October University of Modern Sciences and Arts1 0.2%Ghana Communication Technology University1 0.2%Islamic Azad University of Najafabad1 0.2%Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology1 0.2%Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman1 0.2%Bryan College1 0.2%Hasanuddin University1 0.2%University of the Aegean1 0.2%Lindenwood University1 0.2%Nelson Mandela University1 0.2%
Countries
360 / 476 with data · 116 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 476 selected publications.
Indonesia75 15.8%United States40 8.4%Turkey33 6.9%Kenya23 4.8%Nigeria20 4.2%Bangladesh19 4.0%South Africa16 3.4%India12 2.5%XK12 2.5%Iraq9 1.9%Malaysia9 1.9%Britain (UK)8 1.7%Poland8 1.7%Ghana7 1.5%China6 1.3%Tunisia6 1.3%Rwanda5 1.1%Saudi Arabia5 1.1%United Arab Emirates4 0.8%Brazil4 0.8%Botswana4 0.8%Iran4 0.8%Kuwait4 0.8%Lebanon4 0.8%Belgium3 0.6%Sri Lanka3 0.6%Philippines3 0.6%Pakistan3 0.6%Tanzania3 0.6%Australia2 0.4%Canada2 0.4%Cameroon2 0.4%Egypt2 0.4%Spain2 0.4%France2 0.4%Hungary2 0.4%Japan2 0.4%Latvia2 0.4%Libya2 0.4%Norway2 0.4%Oman2 0.4%Russia2 0.4%Taiwan2 0.4%Albania1 0.2%Côte d’Ivoire1 0.2%Czech Republic1 0.2%Denmark1 0.2%Ethiopia1 0.2%Greece1 0.2%Iceland1 0.2%Italy1 0.2%Jordan1 0.2%Cambodia1 0.2%Nepal1 0.2%New Zealand1 0.2%Sweden1 0.2%Uganda1 0.2%Uruguay1 0.2%Zimbabwe1 0.2%
Primary topics
472 / 476 with data · 4 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 476 selected publications.
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency67 14.1%Corporate Finance and Governance34 7.1%Monetary Policy and Economic Impact29 6.1%Financial Markets and Investment Strategies22 4.6%Islamic Finance and Banking Studies21 4.4%Banking Sector Performance and Management19 4.0%Construction Project Management and Performance17 3.6%Microfinance and Financial Inclusion16 3.4%Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance14 2.9%Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance11 2.3%Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting8 1.7%Technology Adoption and User Behaviour6 1.3%Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis6 1.3%Stock Market Forecasting Methods6 1.3%Corporate Taxation and Avoidance6 1.3%Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction6 1.3%Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting6 1.3%Financial Literacy and Behavior6 1.3%Corporate Governance and Financial Management6 1.3%Efficiency Analysis Using DEA5 1.1%Market Dynamics and Volatility5 1.1%Working Capital and Financial Performance5 1.1%Accounting and Financial Management5 1.1%Stochastic processes and financial applications4 0.8%Global Financial Crisis and Policies4 0.8%Housing Market and Economics4 0.8%FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance4 0.8%Risk Management in Financial Firms4 0.8%Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies4 0.8%Financial Reporting and Valuation Research4 0.8%Digital Transformation in Financial Services4 0.8%Global trade and economics3 0.6%Customer Service Quality and Loyalty3 0.6%Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling3 0.6%Economic Growth and Productivity3 0.6%International Business and FDI3 0.6%Energy, Environment, Economic Growth3 0.6%Local Government Finance and Decentralization3 0.6%Insurance and Financial Risk Management3 0.6%Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds3 0.6%Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence3 0.6%Multi-Criteria Decision Making2 0.4%Blockchain Technology Applications and Security2 0.4%International Development and Aid2 0.4%Taxation and Compliance Studies2 0.4%Emotional Intelligence and Performance2 0.4%Fiscal Policies and Political Economy2 0.4%Economic Theory and Policy2 0.4%Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems2 0.4%Natural Resources and Economic Development2 0.4%Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis2 0.4%Big Data and Business Intelligence2 0.4%Capital Investment and Risk Analysis2 0.4%Leadership and Management in Organizations2 0.4%Management Systems and Quality Improvement2 0.4%Employee Performance and Leadership2 0.4%Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior1 0.2%Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research1 0.2%Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences1 0.2%European Union Policy and Governance1 0.2%Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics1 0.2%Healthcare Policy and Management1 0.2%Higher Education Governance and Development1 0.2%Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs1 0.2%Health Literacy and Information Accessibility1 0.2%Accounting and Organizational Management1 0.2%Environmental Sustainability in Business1 0.2%RFID technology advancements1 0.2%Corruption and Economic Development1 0.2%Gender Diversity and Inequality1 0.2%Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing1 0.2%Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis1 0.2%Credit Risk and Financial Regulations1 0.2%Healthcare Systems and Reforms1 0.2%Employee Performance and Motivation1 0.2%COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts1 0.2%Data Quality and Management1 0.2%Decision Support System Applications1 0.2%Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance1 0.2%Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation1 0.2%Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management1 0.2%Private Equity and Venture Capital1 0.2%ERP Systems Implementation and Impact1 0.2%Public-Private Partnership Projects1 0.2%Evaluation and Performance Assessment1 0.2%Colonialism, slavery, and trade1 0.2%Environmental and Social Impact Assessments1 0.2%Renewable energy and sustainable power systems1 0.2%Grey System Theory Applications1 0.2%European and International Contract Law1 0.2%Stress and Burnout Research1 0.2%Corporate Identity and Reputation1 0.2%Global Health Care Issues1 0.2%Economic and Fiscal Studies1 0.2%Global Financial Regulation and Crises1 0.2%Organizational Change and Leadership1 0.2%Local Governance and Development1 0.2%Marketing and Advertising Strategies1 0.2%Unemployment and Economic Growth1 0.2%Community and Sustainable Development1 0.2%Agricultural Economics and Practices1 0.2%Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection1 0.2%Financial Reporting and XBRL1 0.2%Contemporary and Historical Greek Studies1 0.2%Economic, financial, and policy analysis1 0.2%Global Politics and Economy1 0.2%Employee Performance and Management1 0.2%Banking Systems and Strategies1 0.2%Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition1 0.2%Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies1 0.2%
Yearly trendsCitations receivedCompare by yearPublication detailCitationsComparisonPublicationsOpenAlexInstitutions & topicsData coverage
Publication-year cohorts
Publications & citation trends
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
Publications
View publications data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | All selected publications | 6 | 6 | 6/6 | 6/6 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 29 | 29 | 29/29 | 29/29 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 26 | 26 | 26/26 | 26/26 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 15 | 15 | 15/15 | 15/15 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 72 | 72 | 72/72 | 72/72 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 20 | 20 | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 20 | 20 | 20/20 | 16/20 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 35 | 35 | 35/35 | 35/35 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 41 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 44 | 44 | 44/44 | 44/44 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 41 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 33 | 33 | 33/33 | 33/33 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 32 | 32 | 32/32 | 32/32 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 62 | 62 | 62/62 | 62/62 |
Crossref citations
View crossref citations data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | All selected publications | 25 | 6 | 6/6 | 6/6 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 56 | 29 | 29/29 | 29/29 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 53 | 26 | 26/26 | 26/26 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 55 | 15 | 15/15 | 15/15 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 100 | 72 | 72/72 | 72/72 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 86 | 20 | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 26 | 20 | 20/20 | 16/20 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 96 | 35 | 35/35 | 35/35 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 169 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 82 | 44 | 44/44 | 44/44 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 52 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 62 | 33 | 33/33 | 33/33 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 44 | 32 | 32/32 | 32/32 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 31 | 62 | 62/62 | 62/62 |
OpenAlex citations
View openalex citations data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | All selected publications | 62 | 6 | 6/6 | 6/6 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 139 | 29 | 29/29 | 29/29 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 109 | 26 | 26/26 | 26/26 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 167 | 15 | 15/15 | 15/15 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 330 | 72 | 72/72 | 72/72 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 206 | 20 | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 58 | 20 | 20/20 | 16/20 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 180 | 35 | 35/35 | 35/35 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 348 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 193 | 44 | 44/44 | 44/44 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 111 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 84 | 33 | 33/33 | 33/33 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 49 | 32 | 32/32 | 32/32 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 32 | 62 | 62/62 | 62/62 |
Citation year / OpenAlex
Citations received over time
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 472 / 476 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:21:59.435320+00:00 — 2026-10-22T10:53:58.577106+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
OpenAlex · Citations received by year
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 56 | 476 | 472/476 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 89 | 476 | 472/476 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 121 | 476 | 472/476 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 155 | 476 | 472/476 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 219 | 476 | 472/476 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 255 | 476 | 472/476 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 343 | 476 | 472/476 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 327 | 476 | 472/476 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 244 | 476 | 472/476 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 133 | 476 | 472/476 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
View data table
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 6 |
| 2013 | 29 |
| 2014 | 26 |
| 2015 | 15 |
| 2016 | 72 |
| 2017 | 20 |
| 2018 | 20 |
| 2019 | 35 |
| 2020 | 41 |
| 2021 | 44 |
| 2022 | 41 |
| 2023 | 33 |
| 2024 | 32 |
| 2025 | 62 |
Crossref citation distribution
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Mean1.97
Median1.0
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Journal comparison
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies SSBFNET | 476 | 937 | 2068 | 472/476 | 1.97 | 1.0 | 56.3 | 476/476 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Most cited · Crossref
Profit Growth : Impact of Net Profit Margin, Gross Profit Margin and Total Assests Turnover
Read abstract
As an industry that has an important role for other industrial sectors, the plastic and packaging industry is the supply chain for consumer products. Behind the high industrial growth and the potential is still large, there are problems with plastic waste, consumption power, and changes in people's lifestyles that can affect the growth of the plastic and packaging industry. This study aims to determine how much impact the NPM (Net Profit Margin), GPM (Gross Profit Margin), TAT (Total Assets Turnover) on Profit Growth in the plastic and packaging industry sub-sector companies listed in IDX (Indonesia Stock Exchange) for the period 2014 to 2018. The method used in this study is a quantitative descriptive. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling in order to obtain a sample of 11 companies from a population of 12 companies. In the study the method of data analysis used the multiple linear regression analysis techniques by processing data using Eviews 8, because the data is not normally distributed, it uses the log transformation method. The results showed that simultaneously NPM (Net Profit Margin), GPM (Gross Profit Margin), TAT (Total Assets Turnover) had a significant effect on profit growth. And partially NPM (Net Profit Margin) has a significant effect on profit growth, while GPM (Gross Profit Margin) and TAT (Total Assets Turnover) have no significant effect on profit growth.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i4.93746 Crossref citations96 OpenAlex citations
Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria
Read abstract
The study examines the bank-specific and macroeconomic determinants of banks profitability in Nigeria analyzing audited financial reports of selected sixteen (16) commercial banks over the period of 2010 to 2015 making up to 96 observations. The study identified that existing studies are sketchy in developing economies even though many studies have emerge in developed economies. The bank profitability is measured by return on assets and return on equity as function of bank-specific and macroeconomic determinants. Using the balanced panel data set, the empirical results of the study shows that capital adequacy and liquidity have a positive and significant effect on bank profitability. However, efficiency ratio have a negative and significant effect on bank profitability. With regards to macroeconomic variable, GDP growth also have a positive and significant impact on banks profitability. The empirical results of the study suggested that banks can improve their profitability through increasing capital and liquidity, decreasing operating cost with conscious effort to maintain transparency in their operations. In addition, a good economic environment for financial institutions foster increase in bank profitability. Hence, the study recommends that further studies can expand the scope while extending to other industries as well.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v6i1.62738 Crossref citations85 OpenAlex citations
The Impact of Inflation on Economic Growth
Read abstract
The main purpose of this study is to investigate inflation rate and its impact on the growth rate or to GDP growth for Eurozone countries, using panel data for the period 1997-2017, on an annual basis with a total of 257 observations. For conducting the study, and achieving results, a multiple linear regression model with the least squares regression is used. Moreover, multiple linear regression analysis has been applied in order to investigate whether Inflation rate, as an independent variable, has any significant impact on economic growth. Consequently, in order to test the data used in the model we have applied diagnostic tests, such as Durbin-Watson test to analyze the correlation of serial correlation, as well as the Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity. The tests’ results give us strong indications that the model has no relation between of serial correlation and there is no heteroskedasticity either. The study conducted shows results generated from the model, and according to the econometric results indicate that Inflation rate has positive impact on the economic growth rate for euro area.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v8i1.29732 Crossref citations54 OpenAlex citations
CAMELS-based Determinants for the Credit Rating of Turkish Deposit Banks
Read abstract
This paper demonstrates the relationship between CAMELS ratios and credit ratings of deposit banks in Turkey. Annual data was used for the period between 2004 and 2014 in this study. Moreover, 20 deposit banks of Turkey were analyzed and 21 different ratios of CAMELS components were used. In addition to that, credit ratings of these banks were provided from Moody’s corporation or annual activity reports of the banks. After that, we created multi nominal logistic regression analysis in order to illustrate the relationship. The major finding in this study is that three components (Asset Quality, Management Quality, and Sensitivity to Market Risk) of CAMELS have effects on credit ratings whereas the ratios related to Capital Adequacy and Earnings are not effective. As a result, it was recommended that Turkish deposit banks should concentrate on the percentage of fixed assets and interest income to have a better rating. Moreover, having high market share with respect to total assets and lower interest expense are also other important points for this purpose. On the other hand, Turkish deposit banks should control the proportion of financial assets and increase the amount of FX liquid assets to prevent credit ratings to decrease. Additionally, market share of banks for loans should not reach at high level for this objective.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v4i4.3529 Crossref citations68 OpenAlex citations
Analysis of Impacts of Operational Risk Management Practices on Banks’ Financial Performance: Study of Selected Commercial Banks in Nigeria
Read abstract
Increase in losses borne by banks as a result of inadequate operational risk management practices and the adverse impact on banks’ financial performance has been a major concern to bank management and regulators. This study analysed the impact of operational risk management practices on the financial performance of commercial banks in Nigeria. 10-years (2008 - 2017) secondary data extracted from audited financial statements of selected commercial banks in Nigeria was used for the study. The data was analysed using the Linear Multiple Regression Model. The results showed that there is a positive relationship between operational risk management and the financial performance of banks. The findings revealed that sound operational risk management practices impact positively on the financial performance of banks. We, therefore, recommend that banks’ management should deploy adequate resources towards understanding operational risk to ensure sound operational risk management and improved financial performance of banks.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i1.63420 Crossref citations32 OpenAlex citations
Selected results
Observations and Inferences About the Fixed Cost in Protective Put Strategy
Read abstract
The Options Based Portfolio Insurance (OBPI) should avoid losses and capture gains, by the cost of a “premium”, but in practice the premium cost can be too high to capture gains in the different market conditions. Based on this premise, the objective of this study is to analyze an optimized alternative to Options Based Portfolio Insurance, assuming that the probability of an Extreme Negative Event varies with time, and therefore the insurance floor should not be maintained at any cost. To achieve the objective, data were crossed between the rollover date and a fixed insurance cost on equity, using historical data from 678,546 trades carried out in the US market, which resulted in 3,700 portfolios. Data analysis was performed using descriptive and econometric statistics with simple linear regressions. The results demonstrated that the insured floor varied with the volatility implied in option prices, indicating the possibility of obtaining better return-risk ratio and lower drawdown when compared to the unprotected portfolio, showing a positive correlation between insurance cost and return-risk ratio for low costs and a negative correlation for higher costs. Furthermore, it can be indirectly inferred that the explanation for the results comes from the perception of risk by the market not representing the real risk. As with the stabilization and possible recovery of prices that occur after a significant drop, market confidence is not restored to the same proportion. That’s why volatility remains at high levels, consequently, raising the insurance cost, even with lower probabilities of Extreme Negative Events.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i4.38480 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
Accounting for Digital Assets Between Accounting Measurement Theory and Financial Disclosure Requirements
Read abstract
The current research aims to examine the accounting of digital assets by linking accounting measurement theory to financial disclosure requirements, in light of the challenges related to the absence of specialized international accounting standards for digital assets. The research was divided into two parts: theoretical and applied. The theoretical part included a review of the literature related to accounting measurement (historical cost, fair value, and impairment model) and financial disclosure requirements according to International Financial Reporting Standards (IAS/IFRS) and American standards (FASB, AICPA, and SEC). The applied part used a questionnaire and administered to a sample of financial report users, including academics and professionals, to obtain their opinions on the adequacy of current measurement models, financial disclosure requirements, and shortcomings in international standards. It also explored the possibility of formulating an integrated framework for measuring and disclosing digital assets. The results of the analysis of the questionnaire showed that fair value measurement is more appropriate for the nature of digital assets than traditional models, with the need to enhance disclosure of risks associated with price volatility, liquidity, and operational risks. It also showed that the absence of a specific accounting standard for digital assets leads to poor comparability and increased variation in accounting practices across economic entities. Based on the survey results, an integrated theoretical framework for accounting for digital assets was proposed. This framework includes principles of recognition, measurement, and disclosure, and contributes to achieving the objectives of financial reporting in accordance with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) conceptual framework, ensuring relevance, accurate representation, comparability, clarity, and timeliness. The study concluded that developing a specialized accounting framework for digital assets represents a strategic necessity to ensure the reliability and transparency of financial reporting and enhance user confidence, given the rapid growth in the adoption of digital assets within global economic activities.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i4.45472 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
The Potential of Employing Blockchain Technologies in Enhancing Operational Transparency of Iraqi Banks
Read abstract
This study examines the prospective integration of blockchain technologies to enhance operational transparency in the Iraqi banking sector. Despite the absence of actual blockchain deployment, the research adopts a foresight-driven, empirical approach combining literature analysis with survey data from 82 banking professionals. Results from statistical tests (including ANOVA and t-tests) reveal a generally low level of institutional awareness but a strong perceived potential for transparency improvement—especially when paired with a phased implementation model. Moreover, technological infrastructure and management attitudes were found to significantly mediate the adoption process. The study concludes with practical recommendations tailored to Iraq’s institutional realities and proposes a scalable roadmap for gradual blockchain adoption. These insights contribute to bridging the gap between technological potential and institutional readiness in developing economies.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i4.44231 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
The Role of Financial Statements in Reporting Financial Risks
Read abstract
This research aims to demonstrate the role of financial statements (balance sheet) in reporting the risks faced by government units and the extent of the risks within these units, in addition to demonstrating the steps through which risks can be managed in these units, whether they are governmental or private economic units. Financial risks are one of the problems facing economic units, whether private or governmental. In turn, decision-makers, both internal and external, work to measure the financial risks facing these units. Therefore, the research problem is as follows, Do financial position statement contribute to reporting financial risks in governmental units (Baghdad Municipality)? In order to achieve the research objectives, the financial position statement of the Baghdad Municipality Department (a government unit) was used, and a set of indicators was used to reach a judgment on the presence or absence of risks, as well as the level of risks facing this unit. It was found that there is a possibility of knowing the risks through the financial position statement, in addition to discovering that the level of risks facing this unit (Baghdad Municipality) is considered high.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i3.45050 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
To Self-Insure or Not - That is the Question for A Large Group Health Plan
Read abstract
This is a study about the financing of large group health insurance in the United States. Almost 8 in 10 covered employees in private large firms are enrolled in self-insured (or self-funded) health plans in contrast to only 20 percent of employees in small firms. More than half of all large standard (non-supplemental) health plans are self-insured although their number is decreasing. Considering their significantly greater risk of exposure and transaction costs, the question for scholarly investigation is why (and how) do private large firms self-fund employer-sponsored health insurance? Using plan-level data from health plan administrator filings of Forms 5500 and Summary Annual Reports (2014-2022) with the U.S. Department of Labor, six variables are examined in this study relative to large group self-insurance: industry/sectoral distribution, plan size/enrollment, plan administration, benefits coverage, plan assets and investments, and statutory compliance. Findings suggest that industry/sectoral and enrollee distributions of large health plans are not widely dispersed while their assets and investments and statutory exemptions offer comparative advantages. These plans have also increasingly relied on stop-loss insurance, third-party administration, supplemental health benefits, and less major medical plans to mitigate actuarial risks that involve considerable financial exposure to fluctuating claims costs, potential for catastrophic claims, and cash flow unpredictability. The intertwining theoretical and practical implications of large group self-insurance in healthcare finance and risk management are addressed by way of conclusion.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i3.45090 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
Data coverage & freshness
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Crossref476of 476 selected recordsOJS API400of 476 selected recordsOAI-PMH407of 476 selected recordsXML0of 476 selected recordsOpenAlex472of 476 selected records
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbs | complete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbs | complete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbs | complete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC · ijfbs | complete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC |