CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 6/6 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 03:14 UTC
PUBLICATIONS6In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS186/6 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS356/6 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN5.83Per article with a known count
Explore articles 6 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Stock Market Forecasting Methods Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Istanbul University2Konya Food and Agriculture University1Istanbul Medipol University15/6 records with data

Countries

Indonesia2Turkey2Latvia15/6 records with data

Primary topics

Stock Market Forecasting Methods66/6 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 6/6 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T03:14:43.064552+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
6 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS6
CROSSREF CITATIONS18
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS83.3%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS3.0

Crossref citation coverage: 6 / 6 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS35
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%6 / 6 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY5.836 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3.0

Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 01:20 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 03:14 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations11–536–20221+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

5 / 6 with data · 1 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.

Countries

5 / 6 with data · 1 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.

Primary topics

6 / 6 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 6 / 6 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T01:20:50.875437+00:00 — 2026-10-22T03:14:43.064552+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

73.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 6/62018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 6/62019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 6/62020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 6/62021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 6/62022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 4 · Annual history coverage 6/62023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 6/62024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 7 · Annual history coverage 6/62025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 7 · Annual history coverage 6/62026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 6/6 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications066/6
2018All selected publications066/6
2019All selected publications266/6
2020All selected publications266/6
2021All selected publications666/6
2022All selected publications466/6
2023All selected publications666/6
2024All selected publications766/6
2025All selected publications766/6
2026All selected publications166/6

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean3.0
Median1.5
No citations11–546–20121+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
618356/63.01.583.36/6 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 6 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Technical Analysis To Determine Buying And Selling Signal In Stock Trade

Rommy Pramudya · Rommy Pramudya

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2020

Read abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine which indicators are more capable of showing more accurate sell and buy signals on the LQ45 index by using the oscillator indicator Moving Average Divergent Convergent (MACD), Bollinger Band, and Relative Strength Index (RSI). The results in this study indicate that the sell signal can be captured well by the Bollinger band and MACD indicators, but it cannot be captured properly by the RSI, the volume can be small or heading and are in the side ways, while the MACD plays a too slow role in capturing the signal buy compared to Bollinger bands and RSI. The use of a single indicator will never show a buy and sell signal that is really accurate, this is based on the results of research that shows the difference in timeliness in Bollinger, RSI and also MACD so that the combination of several types of indicators will be better compared to using single indicators. Although in statistics there are no significant differences, there are only differences in increment and improvement in the placement of existing values, but in this case, the order of this value is crucial for traders because it requires very high accuracy to determine the right decision in daily transactions.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i1.66611 Crossref citations20 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Trading Volume as a Predictor of Market Movement

Edson Kambeu

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2019

Read abstract

A logistic regression model is has also become a popular model because of its ability to predict, classify and draw relationships between a dichotomous dependent variable and dependent variables. On the other hand, the R programming language has become a popular language for building and implementing predictive analytics models. In this paper, we apply a logistic regression model in the R environment in order to examine whether daily trading volume at the Botswana Stock Exchange influence daily stock market movement. Specifically, we use a logistic regression model to find the relationship between daily stock movement and the trading volumes experienced in the recent five previous trading days. Our results show that only the trading volume for the third previous day influence current stock market index movement. Overall, trading volumes of the past five days were found not have an impact on today’s stock market movement. The results can be used as a basis for building a predictive model that utilizes trading as a predictor of stock market movement.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v8i2.1773 Crossref citations8 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Random Regression Forest Model using Technical Analysis Variables

Senol Emir · Hasan Dincer · Umit Hacioglu · Serhat Yuksel

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2016

Read abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the importance and ranking of technical analysis variables in Turkish banking sector. Random Forest method is used for determining importance scores of inputs for eight banks in Borsa Istanbul. Then two predictive models utilizing Random Forest (RF) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are built for predicting BIST-100 index and bank closing prices. Results of the models are compared by three metrics namely Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Square Error (MSE), Median Absolute Error (MedAE). Findings show that moving average (MAV-100) is the most important variable for both BIST -100 index and bank closing prices. Therefore, investors should follow this technical indicator with respect to Turkish banks. In addition ANN shows better performance for all metrics.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v5i3.4612 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Application of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short- Term Memory (LSTM) for Predicting Cryptocurrency Prices in Optimizing Investment Strategies on Bitcoin

Sendy Ardiansyah · Putu Nina Madiawati · Agus Maolana Hidayat

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

This study investigates the application of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models for predicting Bitcoin prices, with the objective of enhancing investment approaches. Given Bitcoin's significant volatility and inherent risk, accurate price forecasting is vital for making strategic decisions. The research evaluates model performance by analyzing Bitcoin price data spanning May 25, 2020, to May 25, 2024, employing quantitative methodologies like experimental design and predictive analysis. Results indicate the LSTM model achieves superior predictive accuracy over the RNN model, demonstrated by reduced Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) figures. Additionally, the research delves into how these models affect the Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA) investment strategy, offering perspectives on the advantages and drawbacks of using machine learning to optimize cryptocurrency investments. 

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i2.36221 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Predicting the Istanbul Stock Exchange Index Return using Technical Indicators

Senol Emir

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2013

Read abstract

The aim of this study to examine the performance of Support Vector Regression (SVR) which is a novel regression method based on Support Vector Machines (SVM) approach in predicting the Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) National 100 Index daily returns. For bechmarking, results given by SVR were compared to those given by classical Linear Regression (LR). Dataset contains 6 technical indicators which were selected as model inputs for 2005-2011 period. Grid search and cross valiadation is used for finding optimal model parameters and evaluating the models. Comparisons were made based on Root Mean Square (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Theil Inequality Coefficient (TIC) and Mean Mixed Error (MME) metrics. Results indicate that SVR outperforms the LR for all metrics.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v2i3.1581 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Application of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short- Term Memory (LSTM) for Predicting Cryptocurrency Prices in Optimizing Investment Strategies on Bitcoin

Sendy Ardiansyah · Putu Nina Madiawati · Agus Maolana Hidayat

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

This study investigates the application of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models for predicting Bitcoin prices, with the objective of enhancing investment approaches. Given Bitcoin's significant volatility and inherent risk, accurate price forecasting is vital for making strategic decisions. The research evaluates model performance by analyzing Bitcoin price data spanning May 25, 2020, to May 25, 2024, employing quantitative methodologies like experimental design and predictive analysis. Results indicate the LSTM model achieves superior predictive accuracy over the RNN model, demonstrated by reduced Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) figures. Additionally, the research delves into how these models affect the Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA) investment strategy, offering perspectives on the advantages and drawbacks of using machine learning to optimize cryptocurrency investments. 

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i2.36221 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Democratising Technical Analysis

Dmitrii Gimmelberg · Marta Glowacka · Alexey Belinskiy · Valentin Artamov

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

This study examines whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can support momentum-based breakout strategies for retail investors by analysing technical charts and validating statistical patterns. We analysed 3,621 price charts (2023–2025) to assess LLMs’ ability to identify trading setups and deviations from random walk behaviour. 13,624 tests were run on 1,204 trades using various statistical tests. While 70% of patterns conformed to random walk behaviour in the short term (7–15 days), momentum signals rose to 26.42% over longer periods (50–250 days). Complex prompting produced both higher random walk classification (72.41% vs. 69.29%) and better returns than single-shot prompting. Incorporating Gamma Exposure (GEX) improved caution but reduced return rates. Discrepancies of up to 20% between JavaScript and Python implementations underscored LLMs’ current limitations in statistical precision. Overall, LLMs may democratise technical analysis but still require human oversight, structured prompting, and validation through traditional methods.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i2.42190 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Technical Analysis To Determine Buying And Selling Signal In Stock Trade

Rommy Pramudya · Rommy Pramudya

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2020

Read abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine which indicators are more capable of showing more accurate sell and buy signals on the LQ45 index by using the oscillator indicator Moving Average Divergent Convergent (MACD), Bollinger Band, and Relative Strength Index (RSI). The results in this study indicate that the sell signal can be captured well by the Bollinger band and MACD indicators, but it cannot be captured properly by the RSI, the volume can be small or heading and are in the side ways, while the MACD plays a too slow role in capturing the signal buy compared to Bollinger bands and RSI. The use of a single indicator will never show a buy and sell signal that is really accurate, this is based on the results of research that shows the difference in timeliness in Bollinger, RSI and also MACD so that the combination of several types of indicators will be better compared to using single indicators. Although in statistics there are no significant differences, there are only differences in increment and improvement in the placement of existing values, but in this case, the order of this value is crucial for traders because it requires very high accuracy to determine the right decision in daily transactions.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i1.66611 Crossref citations20 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Trading Volume as a Predictor of Market Movement

Edson Kambeu

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2019

Read abstract

A logistic regression model is has also become a popular model because of its ability to predict, classify and draw relationships between a dichotomous dependent variable and dependent variables. On the other hand, the R programming language has become a popular language for building and implementing predictive analytics models. In this paper, we apply a logistic regression model in the R environment in order to examine whether daily trading volume at the Botswana Stock Exchange influence daily stock market movement. Specifically, we use a logistic regression model to find the relationship between daily stock movement and the trading volumes experienced in the recent five previous trading days. Our results show that only the trading volume for the third previous day influence current stock market index movement. Overall, trading volumes of the past five days were found not have an impact on today’s stock market movement. The results can be used as a basis for building a predictive model that utilizes trading as a predictor of stock market movement.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v8i2.1773 Crossref citations8 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Random Regression Forest Model using Technical Analysis Variables

Senol Emir · Hasan Dincer · Umit Hacioglu · Serhat Yuksel

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2016

Read abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the importance and ranking of technical analysis variables in Turkish banking sector. Random Forest method is used for determining importance scores of inputs for eight banks in Borsa Istanbul. Then two predictive models utilizing Random Forest (RF) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are built for predicting BIST-100 index and bank closing prices. Results of the models are compared by three metrics namely Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Square Error (MSE), Median Absolute Error (MedAE). Findings show that moving average (MAV-100) is the most important variable for both BIST -100 index and bank closing prices. Therefore, investors should follow this technical indicator with respect to Turkish banks. In addition ANN shows better performance for all metrics.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v5i3.4612 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC
Full import history & methodology →