CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 1/1 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 00:22 UTC
PUBLICATIONS1In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS01/1 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS01/1 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 1 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Environmental and Social Impact Assessments Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

No data available.

0/1 records with data

Countries

No data available.

0/1 records with data

Primary topics

Environmental and Social Impact Assessments11/1 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 1/1 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T00:22:05.410054+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
1 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS1
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 1 / 1 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%1 / 1 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.01 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations11–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

0 / 1 with data · 1 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 1 selected publications.

No verified institutions data for this selection.

Countries

0 / 1 with data · 1 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 1 selected publications.

No verified countries data for this selection.

Primary topics

1 / 1 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 1 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 1 / 1 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:22:05.410054+00:00 — 2026-10-21T00:22:05.410054+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 1/12018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 1/12019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 1/12020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 1/12021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 1/12022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 1/12023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 1/12024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 1/12025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 1/12026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 1/1 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications011/1
2018All selected publications011/1
2019All selected publications011/1
2020All selected publications011/1
2021All selected publications011/1
2022All selected publications011/1
2023All selected publications011/1
2024All selected publications011/1
2025All selected publications011/1
2026All selected publications011/1

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0
No citations11–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
1001/10.000.01/1 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 1 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Project Appraisal Techniques on the Performance of Environmental Conservation Projects

Habarurema Theogene · Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

Environmental conservation projects are crucial for addressing global challenges, and effective project appraisal techniques ensure their successful implementation, sustainability, and optimal resource allocation. However, despite the recognition of these benefits, the actual influence of project appraisal techniques on performance of environmental conservation projects remained insufficiently explored in specific contexts, such as the Musanze district of Rwanda. This study, therefore, aimed to establish the influence of project appraisal techniques on performance of environmental conservation projects in Musanze, Rwanda, specifically, financial appraisal, technical appraisal, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and economic appraisal. The study adopted Systems Theory. The research utilized both descriptive and correlational designs, targeting a census 84 respondents, including project managers, environmental officers, financial planners, technical experts, and community representatives. Data was collected through questionnaires, interviews, and document reviews. A pilot test was conducted with 8 respondents to determine the instrument's ability to produce consistent results over time. Validity and Reliability testing of the research instrument yielded 0.87 and a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.772 from pilot results, confirming the instrument's validity and reliability respectively. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including correlation and regression analysis. The findings for four hypotheses were tested at ?=.05 level of significance and the results were: financial appraisal (P = 0.000 < 0.05), technical appraisal (P = 0.000 < 0.05), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (P = 0.000 < 0.05), and economic appraisal (p=0.000<0.05) have significant influence on project performance, thus rejecting the Null hypotheses. In conclusion, the study highlights the significant positive impact of financial, technical, environmental, and economic appraisals on the performance of environmental conservation projects, and it is recommended that these appraisals be strengthened through continuous monitoring, enhanced financial planning, and comprehensive technical assessments. Future research could explore the broader economic impacts and stakeholder engagement strategies to further improve project sustainability.   

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i1.40230 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Project Appraisal Techniques on the Performance of Environmental Conservation Projects

Habarurema Theogene · Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

Environmental conservation projects are crucial for addressing global challenges, and effective project appraisal techniques ensure their successful implementation, sustainability, and optimal resource allocation. However, despite the recognition of these benefits, the actual influence of project appraisal techniques on performance of environmental conservation projects remained insufficiently explored in specific contexts, such as the Musanze district of Rwanda. This study, therefore, aimed to establish the influence of project appraisal techniques on performance of environmental conservation projects in Musanze, Rwanda, specifically, financial appraisal, technical appraisal, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and economic appraisal. The study adopted Systems Theory. The research utilized both descriptive and correlational designs, targeting a census 84 respondents, including project managers, environmental officers, financial planners, technical experts, and community representatives. Data was collected through questionnaires, interviews, and document reviews. A pilot test was conducted with 8 respondents to determine the instrument's ability to produce consistent results over time. Validity and Reliability testing of the research instrument yielded 0.87 and a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.772 from pilot results, confirming the instrument's validity and reliability respectively. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including correlation and regression analysis. The findings for four hypotheses were tested at ?=.05 level of significance and the results were: financial appraisal (P = 0.000 < 0.05), technical appraisal (P = 0.000 < 0.05), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (P = 0.000 < 0.05), and economic appraisal (p=0.000<0.05) have significant influence on project performance, thus rejecting the Null hypotheses. In conclusion, the study highlights the significant positive impact of financial, technical, environmental, and economic appraisals on the performance of environmental conservation projects, and it is recommended that these appraisals be strengthened through continuous monitoring, enhanced financial planning, and comprehensive technical assessments. Future research could explore the broader economic impacts and stakeholder engagement strategies to further improve project sustainability.   

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i1.40230 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC
Full import history & methodology →