CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 2/2 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC
PUBLICATIONS2In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS02/2 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS02/2 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 2 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Logistics and Transportation Systems Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Namibia University of Science and Technology1Vaal University of Technology1University of South Africa12/2 records with data

Countries

Namibia1South Africa12/2 records with data

Primary topics

Logistics and Transportation Systems22/2 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 2/2 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:23:09.650254+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
2 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS2
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%2 / 2 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.02 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations21–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Countries

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Primary topics

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:04.619090+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:09.650254+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/2 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications022/2
2018All selected publications022/2
2019All selected publications022/2
2020All selected publications022/2
2021All selected publications022/2
2022All selected publications022/2
2023All selected publications022/2
2024All selected publications022/2
2025All selected publications022/2
2026All selected publications022/2

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0.0
No citations21–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
2002/20.00.00.02/2 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 2 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Examining Logistical Readiness for the African Continental Free Trade Area in Global Standard 1 registered Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises in Namibia

Lahja Ampueja · Helvi Ndilimeke Petrus

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The AfCFTA presents significant opportunities for manufacturing SMEs in Namibia to expand into regional markets. However, limited evidence exists regarding the extent to which these enterprises are logistically prepared to participate effectively in continental trade. This study aims to examine the logistical readiness of GS1-registered manufacturing SMEs in Namibia to participate in trade under the AfCFTA. In this paper, it is also aimed to assess SMEs’ awareness of AfCFTA compliance requirements, identify key logistical challenges, and evaluate operational capability gaps related to supply chain documentation, inventory management, and export logistics. The study is underpinned by the Resource-Based View, Institutional Theory, and Trade Facilitation Theory. A qualitative research approach was employed using open-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. A dataset comprising responses from representatives of GS1-registered manufacturing SMEs operating in sectors such as food processing, cosmetics, agro-processing, textiles, and light manufacturing was analysed. Data were collected during 2025 and analysed using reflective thematic analysis supported by Atlas.ti 23 software. The main findings of the study demonstrate that: (i) although awareness of the AfCFTA exists among SMEs, knowledge of specific compliance requirements, including rules of origin, customs documentation, and regulatory procedures, remains limited; (ii) significant internal logistical and operational capability gaps persist, particularly in export skills, inventory management systems, and logistics planning; and (iii) external barriers, including high transport costs, regulatory complexities, and inadequate institutional coordination, constrain SMEs’ readiness to exploit AfCFTA opportunities. The study concludes that GS1 registration is a necessary but insufficient condition for trade readiness and recommends targeted capacity-building initiatives, improved trade facilitation measures, and stronger institutional support to enhance SME participation in continental trade.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i5.53240 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Enhancing warehousing efficiency in the South African automotive sector: challenges and opportunities for supply chain optimization

Xolani Mwandla · Tshepo Mabotja · Elizabeth Chinomona

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of storage in the South African automobile industry, pinpointing difficulties and prospective methods for enhancement. It aims to ascertain how effective warehousing might aid in surmounting logistical challenges and enhancing overall supply chain performance. A qualitative study methodology was utilised to investigate the influence of storage on the automobile industry in South Africa. Exploratory and descriptive research designs were employed to fulfil the research objectives. The target group comprised supply chain specialists from specific automotive manufacturers in Gauteng Province. A purposive sampling method was employed, and data were gathered via structured interviews with 15 individuals. The data were examined via ATLAS.ti Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS), resulting in the identification of principal themes and sub-themes. The research indicated that warehousing is crucial in mitigating obstacles encountered by the South African automotive sector, such as unreliable rail transit, restricted capacity, and elevated port expenses. The incorporation of automation, digital technology, and Industry 4.0 concepts could markedly improve warehousing efficiency. Essential recommendations for enhancing warehousing efficiency encompass the implementation of automated technologies, adherence to circular economy principles, and investment in quality management best practices. The results offer practical suggestions for automobile manufacturers and supply chain experts to enhance warehouse operations. By adopting innovative technologies and optimal processes, organisations may tackle current difficulties, lower operating expenses, and secure a competitive advantage in the South African market. The research underscores the necessity of synchronising warehouse strategies with overarching trends in digital transformation and sustainability. This study enhances the existing knowledge on warehousing in the automotive industry, specifically in the South African setting. It offers distinctive perspectives on how technical advancements and industry trends can enhance warehousing operations and assist the sector in addressing region-specific difficulties. The study emphasises the significance of a comprehensive strategy in warehousing, incorporating automation, digital technology, and sustainability principles.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i9.45590 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Examining Logistical Readiness for the African Continental Free Trade Area in Global Standard 1 registered Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises in Namibia

Lahja Ampueja · Helvi Ndilimeke Petrus

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The AfCFTA presents significant opportunities for manufacturing SMEs in Namibia to expand into regional markets. However, limited evidence exists regarding the extent to which these enterprises are logistically prepared to participate effectively in continental trade. This study aims to examine the logistical readiness of GS1-registered manufacturing SMEs in Namibia to participate in trade under the AfCFTA. In this paper, it is also aimed to assess SMEs’ awareness of AfCFTA compliance requirements, identify key logistical challenges, and evaluate operational capability gaps related to supply chain documentation, inventory management, and export logistics. The study is underpinned by the Resource-Based View, Institutional Theory, and Trade Facilitation Theory. A qualitative research approach was employed using open-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. A dataset comprising responses from representatives of GS1-registered manufacturing SMEs operating in sectors such as food processing, cosmetics, agro-processing, textiles, and light manufacturing was analysed. Data were collected during 2025 and analysed using reflective thematic analysis supported by Atlas.ti 23 software. The main findings of the study demonstrate that: (i) although awareness of the AfCFTA exists among SMEs, knowledge of specific compliance requirements, including rules of origin, customs documentation, and regulatory procedures, remains limited; (ii) significant internal logistical and operational capability gaps persist, particularly in export skills, inventory management systems, and logistics planning; and (iii) external barriers, including high transport costs, regulatory complexities, and inadequate institutional coordination, constrain SMEs’ readiness to exploit AfCFTA opportunities. The study concludes that GS1 registration is a necessary but insufficient condition for trade readiness and recommends targeted capacity-building initiatives, improved trade facilitation measures, and stronger institutional support to enhance SME participation in continental trade.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i5.53240 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Enhancing warehousing efficiency in the South African automotive sector: challenges and opportunities for supply chain optimization

Xolani Mwandla · Tshepo Mabotja · Elizabeth Chinomona

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of storage in the South African automobile industry, pinpointing difficulties and prospective methods for enhancement. It aims to ascertain how effective warehousing might aid in surmounting logistical challenges and enhancing overall supply chain performance. A qualitative study methodology was utilised to investigate the influence of storage on the automobile industry in South Africa. Exploratory and descriptive research designs were employed to fulfil the research objectives. The target group comprised supply chain specialists from specific automotive manufacturers in Gauteng Province. A purposive sampling method was employed, and data were gathered via structured interviews with 15 individuals. The data were examined via ATLAS.ti Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS), resulting in the identification of principal themes and sub-themes. The research indicated that warehousing is crucial in mitigating obstacles encountered by the South African automotive sector, such as unreliable rail transit, restricted capacity, and elevated port expenses. The incorporation of automation, digital technology, and Industry 4.0 concepts could markedly improve warehousing efficiency. Essential recommendations for enhancing warehousing efficiency encompass the implementation of automated technologies, adherence to circular economy principles, and investment in quality management best practices. The results offer practical suggestions for automobile manufacturers and supply chain experts to enhance warehouse operations. By adopting innovative technologies and optimal processes, organisations may tackle current difficulties, lower operating expenses, and secure a competitive advantage in the South African market. The research underscores the necessity of synchronising warehouse strategies with overarching trends in digital transformation and sustainability. This study enhances the existing knowledge on warehousing in the automotive industry, specifically in the South African setting. It offers distinctive perspectives on how technical advancements and industry trends can enhance warehousing operations and assist the sector in addressing region-specific difficulties. The study emphasises the significance of a comprehensive strategy in warehousing, incorporating automation, digital technology, and sustainability principles.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i9.45590 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →