Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 1 / 1 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
1 / 1 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 1 selected publications.
1 / 1 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 1 selected publications.
1 / 1 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 1 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 1 / 1 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:59.992706+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:22:59.992706+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1/1 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
This paper aims to explore the transformative potential of replacing traditional dissertations with community-based projects for law students. It examines how these projects empower both communities and students by addressing key challenges, such as the need for work experience among new graduates and the development of essential skills for the next centuries such as project management, entrepreneurship, problem solving and critical thinking. These skills are crucial for diverse career paths, including roles in non-governmental organizations, academia, management, public service, and entrepreneurship. This study drew on an interdisciplinary approach within a Master's in Law Social Justice program offered by the University of Cape Town. The student utilized non-traditional research methods in law, including job shadowing, interviews, questionnaires, and workshops, to identify and implement impactful solutions for the realisation of the right to health within the Hawston Community in Cape Town. The chosen project which was aimed ensuring the enjoyment of the right to health by residence of the Hawston Community involved palliative care training and fundraising for personal protective equipment and bicycles for caregivers at the Overstrand Care Centre in Hawston, South Africa. The findings of the project demonstrated that law students if empowered with both qualitative and quantitative research methods can use their legal knowledge to conceive projects that result in transformative outcomes which are informed by legal principles and values advocated and advanced throughout their legal studies. The palliative care training which fostered the enjoyment of the right to health significantly improved caregivers' ability to support their communities, addressing gaps in access to healthcare and building a solid foundation for the enjoyment of the right to health provided for in section 27 of the South African Constitution. For the student, the initiative offered practical experience in project management, interdisciplinary research, and community engagement. It also highlighted the value of experiential learning as a pathway for developing entrepreneurship, leadership, and professional skills. The conclusion by the student was that, practical community-based projects as final assessments in legal education can create both theoretically grounded graduates who are socially responsive and can directly address community needs. Compared to writing a dissertation, this approach which will include a writing component of a literature review fosters a new generation of lawyers equipped with practical skills, a commitment to social justice, and the potential to drive entrepreneurship as well as sustainable initiatives. By integrating such projects into legal education, the author recommends institutions to offer an alternative of community projects as opposed to dissertation writing to cultivate future leaders who are both community-sensitive and practice-ready, bridging the gap between academia and societal impact.
This paper aims to explore the transformative potential of replacing traditional dissertations with community-based projects for law students. It examines how these projects empower both communities and students by addressing key challenges, such as the need for work experience among new graduates and the development of essential skills for the next centuries such as project management, entrepreneurship, problem solving and critical thinking. These skills are crucial for diverse career paths, including roles in non-governmental organizations, academia, management, public service, and entrepreneurship. This study drew on an interdisciplinary approach within a Master's in Law Social Justice program offered by the University of Cape Town. The student utilized non-traditional research methods in law, including job shadowing, interviews, questionnaires, and workshops, to identify and implement impactful solutions for the realisation of the right to health within the Hawston Community in Cape Town. The chosen project which was aimed ensuring the enjoyment of the right to health by residence of the Hawston Community involved palliative care training and fundraising for personal protective equipment and bicycles for caregivers at the Overstrand Care Centre in Hawston, South Africa. The findings of the project demonstrated that law students if empowered with both qualitative and quantitative research methods can use their legal knowledge to conceive projects that result in transformative outcomes which are informed by legal principles and values advocated and advanced throughout their legal studies. The palliative care training which fostered the enjoyment of the right to health significantly improved caregivers' ability to support their communities, addressing gaps in access to healthcare and building a solid foundation for the enjoyment of the right to health provided for in section 27 of the South African Constitution. For the student, the initiative offered practical experience in project management, interdisciplinary research, and community engagement. It also highlighted the value of experiential learning as a pathway for developing entrepreneurship, leadership, and professional skills. The conclusion by the student was that, practical community-based projects as final assessments in legal education can create both theoretically grounded graduates who are socially responsive and can directly address community needs. Compared to writing a dissertation, this approach which will include a writing component of a literature review fosters a new generation of lawyers equipped with practical skills, a commitment to social justice, and the potential to drive entrepreneurship as well as sustainable initiatives. By integrating such projects into legal education, the author recommends institutions to offer an alternative of community projects as opposed to dissertation writing to cultivate future leaders who are both community-sensitive and practice-ready, bridging the gap between academia and societal impact.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |