Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 05:38 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 2 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:07.494885+00:00 — 2026-10-22T05:38:10.444376+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 2 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy Bussecon International Academy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1/1 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1/1 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
In South Africa’s ongoing effort to address youth unemployment and skills shortages, Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges play a critical role in equipping students with practical, market-relevant skills. However, the persistent misalignment between student qualification choices and labour market demands raises questions about the effectiveness of these institutions. This study investigates the factors influencing qualification choices and student satisfaction at TVET College in Limpopo, using an exploratory qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten purposively selected students enrolled in National Certificate Vocational (NCV) programmes in Civil Engineering and Office Administration. Thematic analysis revealed that students’ choices were shaped by a combination of personal interests, socio-economic constraints, and limited career guidance. Drawing on Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), the study interprets these choices through the lens of self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and personal goals. While many students expressed satisfaction with their qualifications, challenges such as academic misalignment and low employability prospects were evident. The findings highlight the need for strengthened career counselling and curriculum responsiveness to better align student aspirations with labour market realities.
Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges serve as crucial gateways for South African youth who are unable to access universities due to capacity limitations, financial barriers, or entry requirements. For many rural students, TVET colleges are not just a second choice but the only post-school option available. However, increasing evidence suggests that structural, pedagogical, and governance issues within certain TVET colleges compromise their ability to produce quality, employable graduates. This qualitative study examines systemic challenges that impact teaching quality, lecturer accountability, the language of instruction, admission practices, and student support in rural South African TVET colleges. Drawing on policy documents, academic research, parliamentary reports, and media investigations, the paper examines how these issues perpetuate inequality rather than alleviate it. Special focus is placed on the exclusionary effects of English-only instruction, lecturer oversight, inadequate support systems, dubious recruitment practices, and the admission of under-prepared students into technically demanding programs. The findings identify five interconnected themes that collectively impair graduate employability and student achievement. The study argues that without immediate reforms in lecturer training, accountability systems, and admission standards, TVET colleges risk becoming mere holding institutions instead of pathways to meaningful employment. The paper concludes by recommending stronger oversight, adaptable pedagogy tailored to local contexts, and governance centered on equity, ensuring that TVET colleges fulfil their developmental role in rural South Africa.
Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges serve as crucial gateways for South African youth who are unable to access universities due to capacity limitations, financial barriers, or entry requirements. For many rural students, TVET colleges are not just a second choice but the only post-school option available. However, increasing evidence suggests that structural, pedagogical, and governance issues within certain TVET colleges compromise their ability to produce quality, employable graduates. This qualitative study examines systemic challenges that impact teaching quality, lecturer accountability, the language of instruction, admission practices, and student support in rural South African TVET colleges. Drawing on policy documents, academic research, parliamentary reports, and media investigations, the paper examines how these issues perpetuate inequality rather than alleviate it. Special focus is placed on the exclusionary effects of English-only instruction, lecturer oversight, inadequate support systems, dubious recruitment practices, and the admission of under-prepared students into technically demanding programs. The findings identify five interconnected themes that collectively impair graduate employability and student achievement. The study argues that without immediate reforms in lecturer training, accountability systems, and admission standards, TVET colleges risk becoming mere holding institutions instead of pathways to meaningful employment. The paper concludes by recommending stronger oversight, adaptable pedagogy tailored to local contexts, and governance centered on equity, ensuring that TVET colleges fulfil their developmental role in rural South Africa.
In South Africa’s ongoing effort to address youth unemployment and skills shortages, Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges play a critical role in equipping students with practical, market-relevant skills. However, the persistent misalignment between student qualification choices and labour market demands raises questions about the effectiveness of these institutions. This study investigates the factors influencing qualification choices and student satisfaction at TVET College in Limpopo, using an exploratory qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten purposively selected students enrolled in National Certificate Vocational (NCV) programmes in Civil Engineering and Office Administration. Thematic analysis revealed that students’ choices were shaped by a combination of personal interests, socio-economic constraints, and limited career guidance. Drawing on Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), the study interprets these choices through the lens of self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and personal goals. While many students expressed satisfaction with their qualifications, challenges such as academic misalignment and low employability prospects were evident. The findings highlight the need for strengthened career counselling and curriculum responsiveness to better align student aspirations with labour market realities.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |