Pay for Performance (Pfp) Increasing Creativity Through Intrinsic Motivation
Sidra Rehman · Hafiz Muhammad Shahrukh · Ayesha Mansha Virk · Dr. Mattiullah Butt
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019 · Vol. 8 / Issue 2 · 74-90
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 22:23 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Supervisor enhances their subordinates’ level of creativity to provide the latest insights into intrinsic motivation. Therefore, demonstrating the other site in which pay for performance decisions are controlled by the HR department through individual interaction with increasing (PFP) pay for performance and employee creativity (CR). By utilizing the sample size of 250 questionnaires out of which 206 were completed from Lahore, the city of Pakistan. We establish that the consequence of (PFP) on creativity was invariantly mediating by intrinsic motivation in such a way that both mediator or moderator, PFP had stronger positive effects on creativity. Findings show that regression, mediation and moderation analysis the actual best fit was a PFP model and the Cronbach's alpha values show higher reliability and consistency of values & all variables are very highly correlated to each other. Future study is needed for testing the scale with different cultures and different organizations. Furthermore, intrinsic motivation, as enhanced by trust in management, moderating this mediating effect of PFP on creativity. In addition, the regression path analysis exposed that intrinsic motivation mediated the moderated effect among PFP, trust in management, and creativity. The findings of the current study shed light on the processes and conditions under which, PFP may promote creativity.
Keywords: {'name': 'PFP (pay for performance), Intrinsic motivation, trust in management, creativity'}
Authors & affiliations
Sidra Rehman
Affiliation not supplied
Hafiz Muhammad Shahrukh
Affiliation not supplied
Ayesha Mansha Virk
Affiliation not supplied
Dr. Mattiullah Butt
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.013
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Stew & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/Article
DOI: 10.2307/4151453
DOI: 10.5465/256995
DOI: 10.1002/jocb.001
Amabile, T., Phillips, E., & Collins, M. A. (1993). Creativity by contract: Social influences on the creativity of professional artists. American Psychological Association.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00534.x
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963
DOI: 10.1108/02683940710733115
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. PrenticeHall series in social learning theory (Vol. 1).
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226217062.001.0001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00532.x
DOI: 10.1037/a0027652
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8691.00090
DOI: 10.1037/a0035661
DOI: 10.1177/0734371X11421495
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.04.004
DOI: 10.1037/h0030644
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
DOI: 10.5465/257012
DOI: 10.1348/096317904322915919
DOI: 10.1348/096317904322915919
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
DOI: 10.2307/259083
DOI: 10.1002/job.543
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1153
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.6.676
DOI: 10.1002/job.337
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.677
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.728
DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2003.9651404
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.1012
Frey, B. (2017). Policy consequences of pay-for-performance and crowding-out. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 1(1), 55–59.
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5187-4
DOI: 10.1177/0170840613483655
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00137
DOI: 10.1177/0149206312439327
DOI: 10.1002/job.322
DOI: 10.1177/0013164409355698
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2009.35713319
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2009.43670890
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.01.003
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2011.59215085
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.07.003
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1072149
Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford, 3–4. https://doi.org/978-1-60918-230-4
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0049
DOI: 10.1080/13594320042000007
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.3930220311
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.03.002
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000095
DOI: 10.1007/s11031-016-9574-6
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.004
DOI: 10.1123/jsep.28.1.32
DOI: 10.1080/17461390701302607
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21795
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.54533207
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00760.x
Marsiske, M., Lang, F. B., Baltes, P. B., Baltes, M. M., Dixon, R. A., & Bäckman, L. (1995). Selective optimization with compensation: Life-span perspectives on successful human development. Compensating for psychological deficits and declines: Managing losses and promoting gains. Retrieved from http://resources.library.brandeis.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1995-98961-003&site=ehost-live
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2014.0898
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991
DOI: 10.2307/2070638
DOI: 10.2307/2070638
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00043-1
DOI: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
DOI: 10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2006.20785503
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2006.20786079
DOI: 10.1177/1059601106288067
DOI: 10.1007/s40732-018-0324-x
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
DOI: 10.2307/2393868
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1998.926617
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.24348410
DOI: 10.1002/9781119992592.ch5
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.179
DOI: 10.5465/256689
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2008). Organizational Creativity Research. A Historical Overview. In Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 3–31).
DOI: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
DOI: 10.5465/30040662
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1072149
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2699.5.1.3
DOI: 10.1037/a0020540
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0102_4
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x
DOI: 10.1177/1059601117725191
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.03.001
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mup009
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20200
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
DOI: 10.1002/job.2012
DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01044.x
DOI: 10.1016/S0742-7301(03)22004-1