Influence of supportive and participative path-goal leadership styles and the moderating role of task structure on employee performance

Abstract

This study examined the influence of supportive and participative path-goal leadership styles, and the moderating role of task structure on employee performance of coffee trading companies in Kenya. The study was guided by the positivism philosophy and used a descriptive correlational research design. The population comprised 180 senior managers of coffee trading companies in Kenya, and a sample size of 139 was determined using stratified random sampling.  Primary data was collected using questionnaires. The response rate was 84%. The descriptive statistics were means and standard deviations while the inferential analysis included factor analysis, correlational analysis, chi-square, and regression analysis. Results of multiple linear regression analysis revealed that supportive leadership style did not significantly predict employee performance, R2= 0.001, F(1, 110) = 0.118,  p? .05, ? = -0.040, p ? .05 but that participative leadership style significantly predicted employee performance, R2= 0.865, F(1, 115) = 735.111, p ?.05, ? = 0.943, p?05.  Task structure was found to moderate the relationship between path-goal leadership styles and employee performance, R2= 0.094, F(5, 101) = 6.92, p ?.05, ? = 0.208,  p? .05.  The study recommends that leaders of coffee trading companies should apply a participative leadership style with their employees with constant communication and consultation in order to achieve optimal performance.

Keywords: {'name': 'Path-goal Theory'}, {'name': 'Leadership style'}, {'name': 'Supportive'}, {'name': 'Participative'}, {'name': 'Task Structure'}

Authors & affiliations

Rozmina Rana
Affiliation not supplied

George K’Aol
Affiliation not supplied

Michael Kirubi
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Aberdeen Group. (2013). The power of employee recognition, Analyst Insight, pp 1-5. Retrieved from http://go.globoforce.com/rs/globoforce/images/AberdeenReportNovember2013.pdf

DOI: 10.9790/487X-0665663

DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v5n2p192

DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.05.008

Dindyal, J., Cheng, L. P., & Ng, S. L. (2012). Mathematics education: Expanding horizons (Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia). Singapore: MERGA. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia

DOI: 10.1002/job.496

DOI: 10.2307/254928

Evans, M. G. (1979). Leadership in S. Kerr (Ed.), Organizational behavior. Columbus, OH: Grid Publishing.

Hassan, A., & Ahmed, F. (2011). Authentic leadership, trust and work engagement, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 5(8), ISNI:0000000091950263

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2014.26050

DOI: 10.5465/255413

DOI: 10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90024-7

Ijah, A. (2012). Leadership styles of principals and job performance of staff in secondary schools in Delta state of Nigeria. An international journal of arts and humanities, Vol 2, 224-245. ISSN 2225-8590.

Irving, J. A. (2014). The Development and Initial Testing of the Purpose in Leadership Inventory : A Tool for Assessing Leader Goal-Orientation , Follower-Focus, and Purpose-in-Leadership. Servant Leadership:. Theory & Practice , 1(1), 53–67.

Iqbal, N., Anwar, S., & Haider, N. (2015). Effects of leadership style on employee performance. Arabian journal of business management review, 5(146).

Kerpen, D. (2016). 11 Leaders reveal how they want to be managed, retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/11-leaders-reveal-how-want-managed-dave-kerpen/

Khalid, S., & Irshad, M. Z. (2015). Job Satisfaction among Bank Employees in Punjab, Pakistan: A Comparative Study. European journals of social sciences, 17 (4), 570-577.

DOI: 10.7763/IJTEF.2015.V6.471

Lussier, R. N., & Achua, C. F. (2013). Leadership: Theory, Application and Skill Development, pp. 161-170.

Marshall, V. & Rossman, S. A. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organizations. Oxford University Press.

Murugesan, R. (2012). Attributes of Leadership for Success in Project Management. International Journal of Engineering and Management Science , 3(3), 326-335.

Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th edition). Thousand Oaks, California, USA, Sage Publications.

DOI: 10.11634/216796061706212

Pedraja-Rejas, L., Rodríguez-ponce, E., & Rodríguez-Ponze. (2013). Leadership Styles and Effectiveness: a Study of Small Firms in Chile. Interciencia , 31, 500–504.

Pimpa, N., & Moore, T. (2012). Leadership Styles: A Study of Australian and Thai Public Sectors,. Asian Academy of Management Journal , 17( 2), 21–37.

DOI: 10.5465/30040662

Spreier, S., Fontaine, M., & Malloy, R. (2016). Leadership Run Amok: The Destructive Potential of Overachievers. Retrieved 10 23, 2017, from Harvard Business Review,: https://hbr.org/2006/06/leadership-run-amok-the-destructive-potential-of-overachievers

Skouw-Rasmussen, N., Kapande, I., Eisler, T., Andersen, A. S., & Gedremichael, H. H. (2014). The Fate of Coffee in Kenya – An Assessment of Factors Influencing the Small-Scale Producers Decision-Making Process in Gatugi, Village, Othaya, 4-7

Timmerman, M. (2012). How Participative Leadership Powers a Culture of Productivity. Axiom Consulting Partners, pp 55-58.

DOI: 10.22144/ctu.jen.2016.002

Yukl, G. (2015). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle Rive, NJ: Prentice-Hall.