Moderating role of transformational leadership styles of hospital management boards on adoption of mobile health innovations by hospitals in Kenya
Bahati Prince Ngongo · Phares Ochola · Joyce Ndegwa · Paul Katuse
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019 · Vol. 8 / Issue 5 · 286-294
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Sub-Saharan Africa lags other regions in the adoption of both Patient-Centered (PC) and Facility Centered (FC) mobile health (m-health) applications. Transformational Leadership Style (TLS) of Hospital Management Boards (HMBs) is catalytic for the adoption of disruptive technologies such as m-health by hospitals. There is limited evidence on the effect of TLS of HMBs in the adoption of innovations in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICS). This study investigated the moderating role of TLS of HMBs on the adoption of PC and FC m-health by hospitals in Kenya. It used the Logit Regression Model to test null hypotheses that the four constructs of TLS (Idealized Influence (II), Individualized Consideration (IC), Inspirational Motivation (IM), Intellectual Stimulation (IS)) individually or combined had no significant moderating effect on adoption of PC and FC m-health applications. Primary data was collected from a representative sample size of 211 Top Executives (TEs) of level 4 to 6 hospitals who evaluated the TLS of their HMBs on m-health adoption. At a 5% level of significance, the study found that only the combined application of the four constructs (II, IC, IM, IS) significantly moderated the adoption of PC m-health (p=0.046) but did not moderate FC m-health (p=0.345). Each incremental application of TLS would increase the odds of adopting PC m-health by 1.002 but not for FC. Therefore, this study recommends the capacity strengthening of HMBs in TLS to scale up PC m-health adoption in Kenya and other LMICs. It also recommends a differentiated approach to policies, practices, and theories of adoption of innovations using the PC-FC models.
Keywords: {'name': 'Mobile Health'}, {'name': 'Adoption of M-Health'}, {'name': 'Digital Health'}, {'name': 'Health Innovations'}, {'name': 'Kenya'}
Authors & affiliations
Bahati Prince Ngongo
Affiliation not supplied
Phares Ochola
Affiliation not supplied
Joyce Ndegwa
Affiliation not supplied
Paul Katuse
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1108/IJLMA-04-2014-0031
DOI: 10.1108/01437731311289974
DOI: 10.1108/IJLPS-07-2014-0011
DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.3328
DOI: 10.1108/IJOA-10-2011-0520
DOI: 10.1108/01437731111169988
DOI: 10.1177/2050157912459502
Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks etc. Sage.
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.003
DOI: 10.1108/02683941311298869
Field, A., & Miles, J. (n.d.). Discovering statistics using SAS. 2010. London: Sage Publications.
DOI: 10.5688/aj720243
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
DOI: 10.1108/02683940810894747
Mechael, P., Batavia, H., Kaonga, N., Searle, S., Kwan, A., Goldberger, A. & Ossman, J. (2010). Barriers and gaps affecting mHealth in low- and middle-income countries: Policy white paper. Columbia university. Earth institute. Center for global health and economic development (CGHED): with mHealth alliance.
Parahoo K (2006) Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke
DOI: 10.1108/MD-11-2014-0651
DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-10-2014-0197
The Netherland Enterprise Agency (2016), The Kenya Health Sector Market Survey. https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2016/10/2016_Kenyan_Healthcare_Sector_Report_Compleet.pdf
DOI: 10.1108/DPM-04-2014-0060
World Health Organization (2011). Mobile Health: New Horizons for health through mobile technologies. https://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_web.pdf