Understanding the insight of factors affecting mHealth adoption
Md. Abdul Kaium · Yukun Bao · Mohammad Zahedul Alam · Najmul Hasan · Md. Rakibul Hoque
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019 · Vol. 8 / Issue 6 · 181-200
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Numerous studies have addressed the different context of mHealth services among diverse user groups. But due to a lack of understanding the insight of factors affecting the mHealth adoption, it’s crucial need to conduct a systematic review on this issue. The objective of this study was to synthesize the present understanding of the influential factors of mHealth adoption. We performed a systematic literature search on eight electronically reputed scientific databases from 2010 to March 2019, such as Science Direct, Springer, IEEE Xplore, JMIR, Taylor & Francis, Emerald, Mary Ann Liebert and Google Scholar. This was accomplished by gathering data including authors, countries, years, target population, sample size, models/theories, and key influential factors. Primarily, a total of 2969 potentially relatable papers were found, of which 50 met the inclusion criteria. It was found that cross-sectional approach, survey methods and structural equation modeling (SEM) were the most explored research methodologies whereas PLS-SEM was found to be the largest used analysis tools. From the analysis, a total of ninety-four influential factors were clearly recognized and the findings represent that the following 15 factors appeared most recurrently and significantly; perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social-influence, subjective norms, self-efficacy, trust, facilitating conditions, technology anxiety, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, cost, attitude, resistance to change, perceived privacy and security, and perceived behavioral control. The research results have significant theoretical and practical implications for mHealth services providers, researchers and policy makers with regards to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) allied to healthcare.
Keywords: {'name': 'mHealth; Adoption; Factors; Self-Care; a systematic review.'}
Authors & affiliations
Md. Abdul Kaium
Affiliation not supplied
Yukun Bao
Affiliation not supplied
Mohammad Zahedul Alam
Affiliation not supplied
Najmul Hasan
Affiliation not supplied
Md. Rakibul Hoque
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02131-3_41
Alam, M. Z., Hu, W., & Barua, Z. (2018). Using the UTAUT Model to Determine Factors Affecting Acceptance and Use of Mobile Health (mHealth) Services in Bangladesh. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences, 17(2).
DOI: 10.1109/DeSE.2015.58
DOI: 10.1017/idm.2016.6
DOI: 10.1260/2040-2295.6.3.399
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129706
Bjornland, D., Goh, E., Haanæs, K., Kainu, T., & Kennedy, S. (2012). The Socio-economic impact of mobile health. The Boston Consulting Group.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.08.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.014
DOI: 10.1155/2016/3618402
DOI: 10.1109/JSAC.2013.SUP.0513001
DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.38.6.8
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-012-0111-5
DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9316
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.002
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-008-9091-7
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.10.008
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.003
DOI: 10.9790/0050-0112133
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.09.019
DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v8n9p142
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-250
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv052
Greenspun, H., & Coughlin, S. (2012). mHealth in an mWorld: How mobile technology is transforming health care. Deloitte Center for Health Solutions.
DOI: 10.1109/ICMSE.2012.6414426
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0166
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-012-0112-4
Guo, X., Sun, Y., Yan, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Privacy-Personalization Paradox in Adoption of Mobile Health Service: The Mediating Role of Trust. Paper presented at the PACIS.
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2015.11.001
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0289-0
DOI: 10.18034/abr.v5i2.55
DOI: 10.2991/itmr.2014.4.2.3
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002
Hsiao, C.-H., Chen, M.-C., & Tang, K.-Y. (2013). Investigating the Success Factors for the Acceptance of Mobile Healthcare Technology. Paper presented at the PACIS.
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9600-2
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0093
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.216
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2130
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.105
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.008
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26.
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0099
DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-04-2017-0084
DOI: 10.1108/OIR-01-2015-0007
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00259
Leslie, I., Sherrington, S., Dicks, D., Gray, N., & Chang, T.-T. (2011). Mobile communications for medical care: a study of current and future healthcare and health promotion applications, and their use in China and elsewhere (final report, April 2011): Cambridge, University of Cambridge and China Mobile (http://www. csap. cam ….
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.08.007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.004
DOI: 10.4156/ijact.vol4.issue3.1
DOI: 10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2014.6880628
Mechael, P., Batavia, H., Kaonga, N., Searle, S., Kwan, A., Goldberger, A., . . . Ossman, J. (2010). Barriers and gaps affecting mHealth in low and middle income countries: Policy white paper: Columbia university. Earth institute. Center for global health and economic ….
DOI: 10.2196/12269
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2017.04.001
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1336681
Munyua, S., Rotich, G., & Kimwele, M. (2015). Factors affecting the adoption of mhealth in maternal health care in nakuru provincial general hospital. Int J Sci Technol Res, 2015, 4.
DOI: 10.1109/GHTC.2016.7857342
Ndayizigamiye, P., & Maharaj, M. (2017). Determinants of Mobile Health Adoption in Burundi. The African Journal of Information Systems, 9(3), 4.
Okazaki, S., Blas, S. S., & Castañeda, J. A. (2015). PHYSICIANS'ADOPTION OF MOBILE HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEMS IN SPAIN: COMPETING MODELS AND IMPACT OF PRIOR EXPERIENCE. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 16(3), 194.
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2159
PWC, G. (2012). Touching lives through mobile health: Assessment of the global market opportunity.
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0111
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2635
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.003
Saunders, M. N. (2011). Research methods for business students, 5/e: Pearson Education India.
DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00123
DOI: 10.1007/3-7908-1636-1_7
DOI: 10.1362/147539214X14103453768697
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0071
DOI: 10.1109/ISCIT.2014.7011948
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.002
Sun, Y., Wang, N., Guo, X., & Peng, Z. (2013). Understanding the acceptance of mobile health services: a comparison and integration of alternative models. Journal of electronic commerce research, 14(2), 183.
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
DOI: 10.2307/30036540
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2010.9990
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2018.06.003
DOI: 10.1057/jit.2008.30
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.03.003
DOI: 10.1109/ICCISci.2012.6297239
DOI: 10.3233/THC-140811
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0092
DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2016.1200053
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.006
DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2016.1255631