A critical approach to active learning
Muhammad Jakir Al Faruki
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020 · Vol. 9 / Issue 3 · 165-174
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:33 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 22:54 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This micro-level study conducted on tow Bangladeshi colleges intended to explore how far learners have engaged actively in the process of learning and teaching. This article (1) examines the nature and character of active learning and (2) elucidates the present approach of learning in practice in the higher education of Bangladesh at the college level affiliated with National University, Bangladesh. The investigation completed by applying the mixture of qualitative and quantitative approaches, though it is primarily focused on qualitative analysis. Data collected based on two cases. In addition, four FGD sessions have arranged with teachers and students and two of them with the teacher and rest two with the students. In this case study, we come across that student-teacher engagement in learning is very low. There are few scopes for reaching students' behavior, motivation levels in the learning situation. Absenteeism is very high in the students as well as in the teacher. Both the learners and instructors involved in learning for a short period of time. Their staying in the institution for short is a barrier to a high level of engagement in teaching-learning. As a consequence, they do not become the anytime, anywhere learner thereby not lifelong learners
Keywords: {'name': 'Active learning, Passive learning, Absenteeism, lifelong learners, Quality education, Bangladeshi Colleges.'}
Authors & affiliations
Muhammad Jakir Al Faruki
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Ahmed, M. (2019). Samakal: Dhaka
DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.13569abstract
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers, Minute paper, 148-153.
Banbeis, (2015), Education Survey 2015. Ministry of Education, Bangladesh .
Brame, Cynthia J. 2016, Active Learning, Journal of Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching,1-4
DOI: 10.1177/1469787415589529
Cassell, J. (2002). We have these rules inside: The effect of exercising voice in a children’s online forum. In S. L. Calvert, A. B. Jordan, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.). Children in the digital age: Influences of electronic media on development. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Habib, W. (2018) Foreign Expert Remit $5billion from Bangladesh Per Year, the Daily Star.
Hammond, J., Gibbons, P., Michell, M., & Sharpe, T. (2001). Putting scaffolding to work in language and literacy education: New directions in ESL education. NSW DET, ARC & Multicultural Programs Unit.
Haque, N. (2018). The Students are harassed in Educational Institutions Not for Going Teachers’ Private Tuitions, The Daily Ittefaq (a vernacular daily).
DOI: 10.2190/4T89-30W2-DHTM-RTQ2
DOI: 10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047415.48495.05
Ministry of Education (MOE), 2015, Manual for the Master Trainers for the Curriculum Dissemination Program, Dhaka: NCTB.
MOE (2010). National Education Policy-2010, Dhaka: Ministry of Education, Bangladesh.
Perkins, D.(1995). Smart Schools: Better Thinking and Learning for Every Child, New York: Free Press.
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Raudys, J. (2018). Teaching Strategies, Teaching Tools, www.prodigygame.com
Slavin, R. E. (1994). A practical guide to cooperative learning. Macmillan College.
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1020778
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033
UCLES, 2017, Metacognition, Cambridge Assessment International Education, www.cambridgeinternational.org
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284