Economic approach in corruption settlement based on state loss value

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out how to resolve corruption on the basis of the value of state loss with an economic approach to the law. This research is normative juridical research with a statute approach, comparative approach, case approach and conceptual approach. This research shows research on the philosophy of eradicating corruption, restoring state losses, and high efficiency in order to realize economic growth and national development through an economic analysis approach to the application of its law. The results showed that the PTPK Law was made for economic stability, therefore, solving the problem of corruption cannot be separated from the consideration of the country's economy, and the costs that pose a relative risk to state expenditure affecting the country's economy. The juridical reality, the regulation of additional criminal charges, namely the penalty of paying as much as the amount of corrupt compensation as stated in Article 18 paragraph 1 letter (b) of the PTPK Law, if it is related to empirical facts about the imbalance between costs and the recovered economic value, is the reality is that the series of state expenses have increased.    

Keywords: {'name': 'Corruption, law enforcement, state loss, economic approach'}

Authors & affiliations

Samsul Huda
Affiliation not supplied

Prija Djatmika
Affiliation not supplied

Bambang Sugiri
Affiliation not supplied

Siti Hamidah
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Fajar, Sugiyanto. (2013). Economic Approach To Law. Jakarta, PT Kencana Prenada Media Group.

DOI: 10.1093/ojls/6.1.1

John, Kenedi. (2017). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) Dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta, pustaka pelajar.

Karl E. Case and Ray C. Fair. (1999). Prinsip-Prinsip Ekonomi. edisi ke delapan. Jakarta. Erlangga.

DOI: 10.1016/S1573-4420(02)80029-5

Suparmoko. (1992). Keuangan Negara Dalam Teori Dan Praktek. Yogyakarta, BPFE.

DOI: 10.33751/palar.v3i1.402

Romli atmasasmita.(2018). Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan – Geen Straf Zonder Schuld. Jakarta, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sadono sukirno. (2009). Mikro Ekonomi–Teori Pengantar. edisi ke tiga. Jakarta, PT RadjaGrafindo.

T.J. Gunawan. (2018). Konsep Pemidanaan Berbasis Nilai Kerugian. revision edition. Jakarta, Kencana.

https://kbbi.web.id/rasional.html

presidenri.go.id

Laws And Regulations

Indonesia, (1945), the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, 1945.

Indonesia, (2003), Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance.

Indonesia, (2004), Presidential Instruction number 5 of 2004 concerning the acceleration of corruption eradication.

Indonesia, (2006), Law No. 7 of 2006 concerning the ratification of the UN anti-corruption convention.

Indonesia, (2010), Decision of the Kediri District Court Number: 117 / Pid.sus / 2013 / PN.Kdi, dated June 13, 2010.

Indonesia, (2011), Surabaya District Court Decision number: 151 / Pid.sus / 2011 / PT Sby, March 29, 2011.

Indonesia, (2011), Surabaya District Court Decision number: 92 / Pid.sus / 2016 / PT Sby, December 5, 2011Indonesia, (2011), Presidential Instruction number 9 of 2011 concerning the 2011 corruption prevention and eradication action plan.

Indonesia, (2014), Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 111 / PK / Pidsus / 2013 dated December 17, 2014.

Indonesia, (2014), Surabaya District Court Decision number: 73 / Pid.sus / 2013 / PN.Sby, January 6, 2014.