COVID19, mental wellbeing and work engagement

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore how COVID-19 influences the mental health of old age employees by posing challenges to psychological resilience thus affecting their work engagement. The data was collected from three countries, China, Pakistan, and the UK, through eighteen semi-structured interviews. Three sub-themes emerged under the core theme of “psychological challenges”: “cognitive challenges”, “physical challenges”, and “behavioral challenges”. Similarly, “individual resilience” and “group resilience” emerged under the core theme of “psychological resilience”. The results showed that the mental health of old age employees without having any medical complications was also affected during the pandemic thus resulting in low work engagement. The data was collected from three countries namely China, Pakistan, and the UK. Furthermore, data were collected through telephonic interviews so some aspects of the study might be left unexplored which can only be possible through face to face interaction. This study, in line with the previous literature, indicate that challenges explored related to COVID-19 can significantly influence the mental wellbeing of aging employees. The study also encourages employers to understand the limitations of aging employees and develop flexible policies that can have a positive impact on work engagement. The study presents a novel approach contributing to the knowledge gap of COVID-19 impact on wellbeing and work engagement of healthy but senescent employees.

Keywords: {'name': 'Employees wellbeing'}, {'name': 'Work engagement'}, {'name': 'Senescent employees'}

Authors & affiliations

Syed Mudasser Abbas
Affiliation not supplied

Professor Liu Zhiqiang
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16426

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30309-3

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. In: Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.

DOI: 10.1080/10463280701726132

DOI: 10.1348/096317999166635

DOI: 10.1177/1368430214536063

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01224

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30299-3

DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X15001270

DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112954

DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0027

DOI: 10.24321/2455.7048.202002

DOI: 10.1177/070674370705200405

DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.10.003

DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.001

DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30253-1

DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2003100

DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa688

Petric, D. (2020). Negative mental health effects of COVID-19 pandemic and panic.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088534

Rogers, R. W., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1997). Protection motivation theory.

DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30357-3

Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook: SAGE publications limited.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034

DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.03.007

DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/y38m9

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198606

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3550018

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods: Sage publications.