How does self-performance expectation foster breakthrough creativity in the employee's cognitive level? An application of self-fulfilling prophecy
MD Yahin Hossain ORCID ↗ · Zhiqiang Liu · Nilesh Kumar
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020 · Vol. 9 / Issue 5 · 116-128
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:59 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:59 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Drawing on self-fulfilling prophecy theory and status boundary conditions, the aim of this research is to test if promotion focus motivation mediates the employees' self-performance expectations towards breakthrough creativity. Besides, this paper also examines whether status stability significantly moderates the relationship between self-performance expectations and promotion focus motivation. The author conducted a longitudinal study and surveyed 380 staff in China with 102 immediate supervisors. In the first phase of data collection, including self-reported measures of team members' self-performance expectation and promotion focus motivation and status stability in the group. In the second phase of time, supervisors rated their team members' breakthrough creativity. Confirmatory factor analysis is conducted to test the reliability and validity of data. Also, hierarchical linear modeling is used to test the hypothesis. The bootstrapping process was adopted to calculate the indirect effect. The results were in line with the expected conceptual framework, Self-performance expectations and promotion focus motivation are found positive to predict breakthrough creativity. Besides, having more stability in status makes the employee more promotion focus, which brings breakthrough creativity from the cognitive level. Supervisors should organize sensitivity training to make them realize what is anticipated from them. Also, a simple nurturing will mobilize the existing cognitive pressure to achieve breakthrough creativity while investing in lower organizational resources. Finally, this model will deliver new insight into employees' motives towards breakthrough creativity, considering the influence of boundary condition and self-performance expectations in the organization.
Keywords: {'name': 'Breakthrough creativity, promotion focus, status stability, self-performance expectations, self-fulfilling prophecy'}
Authors & affiliations
MD Yahin Hossain
Affiliation not supplied
Zhiqiang Liu
Affiliation not supplied
Nilesh Kumar
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116
DOI: 10.1142/S1363919619500610
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.009
DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00138
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0543
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0543
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.035
DOI: 10.2307/2093465
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Uk.
DOI: 10.1111/peps.12103
DOI: 10.1080/00224540109600587
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00007-7
DOI: 10.1177/0149206316658349
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025974417256
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.006
DOI: 10.1037/apl0000336
DOI: 10.1108/08858621311330281
DOI: 10.1177/0007650316660534
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-36921-X_2
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2019.1631984
DOI: 10.1080/02678370802390132
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00431-4
DOI: 10.1016/1048-9843(92)90018-B
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.352
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.770
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.628
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1992.4279530
DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12028
DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000017
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
DOI: 10.1177/0013164406299129
DOI: 10.1037/mot0000105
DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60240-3
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.452
DOI: 10.1080/01587910802154970
DOI: 10.1177/0033294118773400
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
DOI: 10.5465/3069309
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.314
DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000059
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_8
DOI: 10.1037/a0012695
DOI: 10.1111/caim.12326
DOI: 10.1177/0149206315624961
DOI: 10.1080/00273170701341316
DOI: 10.1111/caim.12214
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1993.1027
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X016009037
DOI: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.008
DOI: 10.2307/3090151
DOI: 10.1007/s11031-008-9118-9
DOI: 10.1002/job.2038
DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2019.1628799
DOI: 10.2307/256865
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.943
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2749-0_1
DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.73.1.3
DOI: 10.1002/jocb.419
DOI: 10.5465/3069429
DOI: 10.1016/j.jm.2002.12.001
DOI: 10.1177/0273475307307600
DOI: 10.1177/1754073909338305
DOI: 10.1177/0149206313506462
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.03.003
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
DOI: 10.1037/0000115-021