Environmental orientation and firm performance
Cemal Zehir ORCID ↗ · Burcu Ozgul ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020 · Vol. 9 / Issue 5 · 13-25
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:28 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 22:56 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the mediation effect of green product and green process innovation by focusing on the role of internal and external environmental orientation over firm performance to expand researches on environmental orientation. With this aim, a conceptual model has been recommended by unifying institutional theory and natural resource-based view. Data collected from 315 firms who have ISO14001 Environmental Management Certificate and took part in Turkey’s first and second ISO 500 Industrial Enterprises list in 2018 have been tested by using SmartPLS 3 software as part of Structural Equation Modelling. Empirical proofs show that internal and external environmental orientation has a positive effect on both green product innovation and green process innovation. Additionally, it has been concluded that internal environmental orientation has a direct positive effect on firm performance, while external environmental orientation has an indirect effect, which is through green product and green process innovation. The reason could be rooted in the ecological responsibility feeling of internal environmental orientation. External environmental orientation, though, could be limited only with fulfilling legal requirements with legitimacy acquiring desire. Firms strategically directed to the green product and green process innovation by doing more than the laws require and taking the lead could increase their firm performance. These findings contribute to theory and practice, enriching our understanding of how two dimensions of environmental orientation affect firm performance.
Keywords: {'name': 'Internal Environmental Orientation, External Environmental Orientation, Green Product Innovation, Green Process Innovation, Firm Performance'}
Authors & affiliations
Cemal Zehir
Affiliation not supplied
Burcu Ozgul
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.192
DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12068
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.059
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2003.8925233
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.144
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00246
DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00135-1
DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.67.2.106.18604
DOI: 10.5465/1556363
DOI: 10.1177/014920639101700108
DOI: 10.1108/14601061211272385
DOI: 10.1177/1086026614537078
CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project). (2013). Sector Insights: what Is Driving Climate Change Action in the World's Largest Companies? Global 500 Climate Change Report 2013 (Carbon Disclosure Project, UK).
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.04.010
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.04.009
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1
DOI: 10.1108/00251741211216197
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2059-1
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.050
DOI: 10.1177/1094428107300343
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016
DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.8284
DOI: 10.1016/1047-8310(88)90005-3
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis fort he behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1828
DOI: 10.1177/0007650310394400
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.013
DOI: 10.2307/2095101
DOI: 10.1108/14601061211272367
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9962-2
DOI: 10.3390/su10124674
DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800313
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.014
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024
Gurbuz, Esın Aslan (2020). WWF-Türkiye (Doğal Hayatı Koruma Vakfı) Doğanın Yok Oluşu Ve Pandemilerin Yukselisi
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.015
Hair Jr. F. J., Black, C. W., Babin, J. B. & Anderson, E. R. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Edinburgh Gata, Harlow. Pearson Education Ltd.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). CA: Sage Publications.
DOI: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033
DOI: 10.1177/0149206310390219
DOI: 10.18488/journal.82.2018.51.31.43
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0986-y
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_2
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
DOI: 10.1017/S1833367200002649
DOI: 10.1108/00251741011090324
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0476-3
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12985
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102375
Latan, H. & Ghozali, I. (2015). Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Techniques and Application Using Program SmartPLS 3.0, second ed. Diponegoro University Press, Semarang.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.044
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0836(200101/02)10:1<38::AID-BSE269>3.0.CO;2-C
DOI: 10.3390/su10061843
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.040
DOI: 10.1177/1523422305274528
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.002
DOI: 10.1177/002224299706100105
DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302
DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.4.97
DOI: 10.3390/su10093161
DOI: 10.1021/es501961k
Prahalad CK. & Hamel G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Haward Business Review, 68(3),79 – 91.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.034
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.092
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.005
DOI: 10.1002/bse.3280010104
Rumelt R. (1984). Toward a strategic theory of the firm. In: Lamb R, editor. Competitive strategic management. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall, 556 – 70.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00672.x
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9512280026
Smith, N.R. (1967). The Entrepreneur and his Firm: The Relationship between Type of Man and Type of Company (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press).
DOI: 10.1108/14601061311324566
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1981
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.06.002
DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-07-2018-0148
Taylor, D.W. & K. Pandza (2003). Network Capability: The Competitive Advantage of Small Firms’, in O. Jones and F. Tilley (eds.), Competitive Advantage in SMEs: Organising for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Chichester, UK: John Wiley): 156-73.
DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-02-2016-0031
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1900
DOI: 10.2307/20650284
DOI: 10.1002/bse.3280030403
DOI: 10.1086/651257
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.023
DOI: 10.3390/su10103737