Impact of digital technology in higher education
Muhammad Mofizur Rahman
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020 · Vol. 9 / Issue 5 · 318-325
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
In the current era, digital technology cannot be overlooked in higher education and other economic factors. Digital technology introduces scopes that expedite blended, e-learning, and online in higher education; suggests a multiple of ways to communicate, learn, correspond, cooperate, and collaborate. Also, digital technology has been more and more widely used in higher education for the continuous development of the economy. This study replicates on the growing importance of digital technology on higher education in Bangladesh over the period 1988-2018. Besides, the study exploits the Johansen cointegration and vector error correction model (VECM) for investigating the positive relationship between digital technology and higher education. The Johansen's cointegration outcomes ascertain that digital technology, higher education, and gross domestic product are cointegrated in the long-run. Furthermore, the VECM outcomes suggest that digital technology can stimulate higher education in both the long run and short run, where learners, educators, and nations are consistently gainer of this country. The study also highlights that higher education consistently contributes to gross domestic product. This research would do twisting up higher education in the kind of digital technology that effectively contributes to educational institutions and countries to remain long-term response. Bangladesh must be beneficial by growing technological development in higher education. For the rapid changes in higher education, the research is advocated that the successful execution of digital technology needs to concentrate on interconnecting structures for transformation: the educator, the educational institutions, and the policymakers. Consequently, public policies would make educational changes in practicing the digital technology of Bangladesh
Keywords: {'name': 'Digital Technology; Higher Education; VECM'}, {'name': 'Bangladesh'}
Authors & affiliations
Muhammad Mofizur Rahman
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1002/sd.1914
DOI: 10.1002/itdj.1590100303
Baum, J. A., & Rowley, T. J. (2008). Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 25.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56523-1_5
DOI: 10.4324/9780203000403-11
DOI: 10.4337/9781845421663
DOI: 10.1002/itdj.20005
Chen, W., & Wellman, B. (2004). The global digital divide–within and between countries. IT & society, 1(7), 39-45.
DOI: 10.2307/2286348
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.08.005
DOI: 10.2307/1913236
Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2003). Yenilik iktisad. TÜBITAK Yayinlari / Akademik Dizi 2.
DOI: 10.1002/9781118269558
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfds.2018.02.005
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2010.11517403
DOI: 10.1002/itdj.20114
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<601::AID-JAE417>3.0.CO;2-T
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199909/10)14:5<563::AID-JAE530>3.0.CO;2-R
DOI: 10.2307/2118477
Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-011-9180-x
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12281
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14
DOI: 10.1080/10168737.2014.894551
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.05.024
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.014
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.346
DOI: 10.1080/09645292.2011.557906
DOI: 10.1080/00358533.2019.1634891
WDI. (2019). World Development Indicators (WDI). The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/country/bangladesh
World Bank. (2019). Digital Technologies in Education. The World Bank Group. www.worldbank.org
DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2009.00634.x