Workplace loneliness and employee creativity from a positive perspective

Abstract

In recent years, feeling lonely in the workplace has become a serious issue that has gained growing concern due to its complex outcomes. Limited research is available on workplace loneliness and empirical research on workplace loneliness is still in infancy. The purpose of this quantitative research study is to determine whether a positive relationship exists between workplace loneliness and employee creativity in the tourism industry of Maldives. I propose a moderated mediation model in which workplace loneliness foster employee creativity via personal identity and knowledge hiding hinders it, and this effect is moderated by team identification. Role transition and social identity theory are used as an explanatory framework for workplace loneliness and employee creativity. Results from a study of 204 individuals show that workplace loneliness is positively and significantly related to employee creativity. Further analysis identified that personal identity is positively and significantly related to the relationship between workplace loneliness and employee creativity. The discussion concludes that a subjective and personal experience; workplace loneliness can foster employee creativity. These results contribute to the literature on creativity and workplace loneliness by clarifying how and what influences of workplace loneliness are related to employee creativity. Recommendation for further research are give

Keywords: {'name': 'workplace loneliness, employee creativity, personal identity, team identification, social identity.'}

Authors & affiliations

Sharmeela Abdul Gafoor
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1080/13501781003792670

DOI: 10.1257/0895330053147930

Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.

Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2008). Studying Creativity, Its Processes, and Its Antecedents: An Exploration of the Componential Theory of Creativity. In Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 33-64). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1989.4278999

DOI: 10.1177/0149206308316059

DOI: 10.1080/00346764.2014.986968

DOI: 10.1002/job.179

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255

Bartel, C., & Dutton, J. (2001). Ambiguous organizational memberships: Constructing organizational identities. Psychology Press.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

DOI: 10.1006/game.2000.0818

DOI: 10.1177/0146167291175001

DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140

DOI: 10.2307/3033681

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0176

DOI: 10.1111/apps.12102

DOI: 10.1108/17574321011028972

DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12132

DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.556785

DOI: 10.1123/jsm.2017-0249

DOI: 10.1108/JMP-06-2015-0205

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02220.x

DOI: 10.1002/job.737

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity:The Work and Lives of 91 Eminent People. New York: HarperCollins.

DOI: 10.1080/13501780600908168

DOI: 10.1177/0146167293191001

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580

DOI: 10.1207/s1532706xid0504_2

DOI: 10.5465/3069350

DOI: 10.2307/3094849

DOI: 10.1002/9781119206422.ch12

DOI: 10.1177/105268469700700505

DOI: 10.2307/2393235

DOI: 10.5465/amr.35.2.zok265

DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.091

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.057

DOI: 10.1207/s15327965pli0403_1

DOI: 10.5465/30040653

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.3.768

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000245

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1994.tb00245.x

DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.11.3.445

DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6

DOI: 10.1108/JKM-12-2012-0380

DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002

Hill, C. A. (2007). The Law and Economics of Identity. Queen’s Law Journal, 32, 389–445.

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2009.37308035

DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1

DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2

Horowitz, M. J. (2012). Self-Identity Theory and Research Methods. Journal of Research Practice, 8(2).

DOI: 10.1007/s10869-016-9446-9

DOI: 10.5465/amr.35.1.zok135

DOI: 10.1177/0149206307309263

DOI: 10.5465/20159587

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0315

DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.65

Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In I. B. (Eds.) (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 169-211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00703.x

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0208

Kreiner, G., & Sheep, M. (2009). Growing pains and gains: Framing identity dynamics as opportunities for identity growth. In L. M. Roberts (Ed.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 23–46). New York: Routledge.

DOI: 10.17230/ad-minister.30.7

DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2012.665070

DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21810

DOI: 10.1177/0018726716676323

DOI: 10.2307/3069309

Maitlis, S. (2009). Who am I now? Sensemaking and identity in posttraumatic growth. In L. M. Roberts & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation. In L. M. Robert (Ed.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 47–76). New York: Routledge.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1954.tb01136.x

DOI: 10.1348/096317904322915892

DOI: 10.1177/000312240607100301

Moss, J. (2018). Helping remote workers avoid loneliness and burnout. Harvard Business Review on Health.

DOI: 10.1177/002216786100100104

DOI: 10.1080/02783190109554087

National Bureau of Statistic, M. (2019). Employment in tourism sector. Retrieved 4 4, 2019, from http://statisticsmaldives.gov.mv

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511780295

DOI: 10.1002/job.678

DOI: 10.5465/256657

DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v33i3.396

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2015.1066

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3226-3

DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.020

Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). Loneliness research: A survey of empirical findings. US: Academic Press.

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2006.20785503

DOI: 10.5465/amr.2001.4378028

DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.48.3.413

DOI: 10.1002/job.2168

DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.06.001

DOI: 10.2307/2787146

DOI: 10.5465/amr.2005.18378874

DOI: 10.1002/smj.398

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472

DOI: 10.2307/256701

DOI: 10.1080/10510970601168624

DOI: 10.2307/1556378

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.179

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50010-1

DOI: 10.1002/jocb.221

DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00028-X

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. England: University of Bristol.

DOI: 10.1111/caim.12069

DOI: 10.5465/3069429

DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x

DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420050102

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.2001.4378025

DOI: 10.1348/096317904774202135

DOI: 10.1111/1464-0597.00020

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.587

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807916.014

Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience & emotional social isolation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4(1), 15-30.

Wright, S. L., Burt, C. D., & Strongman, K. T. (2006). Loneliness in the Workplace: Construct definition and scale development. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 59-69.

DOI: 10.1080/15313220903445215

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.48037118

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2018.95064