Ethical considerations of the Andrra Qielli “sting” by Albana Berisha Qehaja
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020 · Vol. 9 / Issue 6 · 289-290
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:52 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:52 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This letter examines the ethics of a “sting” paper submitted by Dr. Albana Berisha Qehaja, a faculty member of the Department of Management and Informatics, Faculty of Economy, University of Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo. In that paper, which stung this journal, IJRBS, Dr. Qehaja created a fake paper, with a fake name and fake institutional affiliation, as well as specially crafted email and ORCID accounts to masquerade the identity of the true author of the fake paper, namely Dr. Qehaja. Such behavior is not only an act of extreme scholarly malpractice, it is one of the most unethical behaviors in academic publishing because it violates all of the journal’s and international ethics’ practices for submission of a paper to a journal. Other academics thinking of employing such unethical tactics for any publishing-related objective should reconsider their options and carefully calculate the ethical, legal, and possibly criminal consequences of such actions
Keywords: {'name': 'Albana Berisha Qehaja'}, {'name': 'Ethical considerations'}, {'name': 'criminal consequences'}
Authors & affiliations
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1007/s12109-016-9473-4
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i6.568
DOI: 10.21037/amj.2017.02.10
DOI: 10.3329/bjms.v16i4.33623
DOI: 10.17646/KOME.2016.16
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Dobránszki, J., Al-Khatib, A., & Tsigaris, P. (2018). Challenges facing the DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) as a reliable source of open access publishing venues. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 55(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.201811_55(3).e001.BC.BE
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071