CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

Impact of democracy on literacy rate

Md Arif Hosen · Sujan Chandra Paul · Md Harun Or Rosid

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020 · Vol. 9 / Issue 7 · 204-211

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations1Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC

Mendeley · Readers—No verified count available

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of democracy indices on the literacy rate. Panel Data of 134 Countries from 2007-2018 were collected from the website the World Bank and Gapminder. This study uses Ordinary Least Square (OLS), Pooled Ordinary Least Square (POLS), Driscoll-Kraay (DK), Second Stage Least Square (2SLS), Generalized Methods of Moments (GMM) methods. This research has found that political participation index and political culture index has a significant positive relationship with literacy rate in all the method. The functioning of the government index has a significant positive relationship and electoral process and the pluralism index has a significant negative relationship with literacy rate in all the methods except the GMM method. The civil liberties index has a significant negative relationship with literacy rate in POLS and in the other models, there is no significant relationship between the civil liberties index and literacy rate.

Keywords: {'name': 'Literacy rate, Electoral Process and Pluralism Index, Functioning of Government Index, Political Participation Index, Political Culture Index, Civil Liberties Index'}

Authors & affiliations

Md Arif Hosen
Affiliation not supplied

Sujan Chandra Paul
Affiliation not supplied

Md Harun Or Rosid
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511510809

Aristotle(350BC), Politics, Book Eight, Part 1.

Burchi, F. (2006, August). Education, human development, and food security in rural areas: Assessing causalities. In International Conference of the Human Development and Capability Association: Freedom and Justice, September, Groningen, the Netherlands.

DOI: 10.1016/0306-9192(81)90032-4

DOI: 10.1257/000282806777212053

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511804960

De Mesquita, B. B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2005). The logic of political survival. MIT press.

DOI: 10.1177/0022343310386175

Engerman, S. L., Mariscal, E. V., & Sokoloff, K. L. (2002). The evolution of schooling institutions in the Americas, 1800-1925.

DOI: 10.1086/601447

DOI: 10.3386/w12128

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226356556.001.0001

HDRSA. (1998). Human Devlopment Report South Asia: Published by Human development centre. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-3164

DOI: 10.2307/1951731

Lind, A. (2008). Literacy for all: Making a difference. Unesco.

DOI: 10.1177/0010414001034006001

DOI: 10.1086/261013

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511575839

DOI: 10.1177/0010414001034006001

DOI: 10.1177/001979390505800410

DOI: 10.30541/v32i4Ipp.433-451

DOI: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00127.x

DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(93)90027-K

Sen, A. (2004). What’s the Point of Democracy. American Academy of Arts and Sciences Bulletin, 57(3).

Sen, Amartya (1999), Utvecklingsomfrihet, Daidalos AB, Edition 2002, Uddevalla.

DOI: 10.1016/S1573-4471(88)01016-2

Street BV (1995). Social illiteracies. London and New York: Longman. pp. 9-15.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2006.00450.x

World Bank. (1993). Staff appraisal report on Female Secondary School Assistance. Report No. 15496-IN, 16 February 1993.

DOI: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00127.x

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2004.04.009

World Bank. (1994). Nepal: Critical issues in secondary education and options for reform Report No. 12243-NEE 26 August 1994.

World Food Programme & Food and Agriculture Organization. (2010). State of Food Insecurity in the World: Addressing Food Insecurity in Protracted Crisis”. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome 2010. ISBN 978-92-5-106610-2.