Intangible economic benefit of remote sensing data in Indonesia
Shinta Rahma Diana · Ida Musdafia Ibrahim ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020 · Vol. 9 / Issue 7 · 150-159
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN) as a space ecosystem runner government institution of the space agency in Indonesia is mandated by Indonesia space law of 2013 to carry out remote sensing activities that are not only strategic nationally in nature but also charged being benefits economically. This study investigated the intangible economic benefits of remote sensing activities in Indonesia. This research explored qualitatively the advantage of the use of remote sensing information by users obtained from the results of questionnaires and in-depth interviews. The conceptual framework of intangible benefit is based on the information system success model by the De-Lone and McLean Information Value model. The results showed that the quality of remote sensing was good. This can be seen from most responses of user respondents on the Perceived System Quality and Information Quality indicators giving a good rating. The response of the user respondents caused a sense of satisfaction and also caused the use of the system to be more intense. These had a good impact on the performance of respondents, both individually and organizationally. Strengthened by in-depth interviews showed that economically provide benefits with an average of 64% increasing in the efficiency of the performance by Agriculture and Palm Oil sectors. In short, space agency in Indonesia is proven to provide intangible economic benefits on remote sensing activities.
Keywords: {'name': 'Government Institutions, Remote Sensing, Perceived System Quality, Information Quality, intangible economic benefits'}
Authors & affiliations
Shinta Rahma Diana
Affiliation not supplied
Ida Musdafia Ibrahim
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
ACIL Tasman. (2013). The economic value of earth observation from space: A review of the value to Australia of Earth observation from space. http://www.acilallen.com.au/cms_files/ACILAllen_Earth2013.pdf.
DOI: 10.30536/j.ijreses.2015.v12.a2669
DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.7316
Diana, S. R., Purnama, S. M., Dharma, G., Sutrisnanto, A., Perwitasari, I., & Farida, F. (2019). Estimation the Amount of Oil Palm Production Using Artificial Neural Network and NDVI SPOT-6 Imagery. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 4(11).
EARSC. (2016). What is the economic value of satellite Imagery? The case of forest management in Sweden. http://earsc.org/news/what-is-the-economic-value-of-satellite-imagery-the-case-of-forest-management-in-sweden.
Gibson, M., Arnott, D., Jagielska, I. & Melbourne, A. (2004). Evaluating the intangible benefits of business intelligence: review & research agenda. In Meredith, R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2004 IFIP WG 8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Systems (DSS2004): Decision Support in an Uncertain and Complex World (pp. 295-305). Caulfield East, Victoria, Australia: Monash University.
DOI: 10.3390/s90301768
DOI: 10.3390/s90301768
Laudon, Kenneth C., and Laudon, Jane P. (2006). Management Information Systems (10th ed.), New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2003010103
Mohajan, Haradhan. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People. Vol-7, Issue 01, 2018, pp. 23-48. Online athttps://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85654/MPRA Paper No. 85654, posted 04 Apr 2018 12:47 UTC.
Mulyadi, K. (2009). Utilization of Remote Sensing for Monitoring Natural Resources and the Environment. Massma Publishing, Jakarta.
Republic of Indonesia. (2013). Indonesia Legislation Number 21 of Space in 2013. https://lapan.go.id/ files_arsip/UU_no.21-2013_keantariksaan_(English-Version).pdf.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2003). Research Methods For Business, A Skill Building Approach, John Willey & Sons. Inc. New York.
Space.tec partners. (2012). Assessing the Economic Value of Copernicus: European Earth Observation and Copernicus Downstream Services Market Study.
Suryana, Sugiono, Sekaran, U., Lee, S., Stearns, T., & Geoffrey, G. M. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R and D. International Journal of Management. 3(11), 1-14.
USGS. (2013). What is the Economic Value of Satellite Imagery? https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2013/3003/fs2013-3003.pdf.
DOI: 10.22302/iopri.jur.jpks.v24i3.17