Meaningful practice creating shared value as a contribute to sustainable development goals
Alan smith Purba · Eko Ganis Sukoharsono · Bambang Hariadi
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020 · Vol. 9 / Issue 7 · 222-232
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 22:02 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study aims to reveal the meaning of the Creating Shared Value (CSV) practice as a contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at PT Pupuk Kaltim (PKT) with a case study approach. CSV with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a concept that does have the same umbrella, which is a charity to the community and contributes to SDG's but in practice these two concepts are different. The difference lies in the value generated. CSV provides significant value to the company in the form of profit in the form of reducing the company's activity costs and is related to the company's core business products so that the value that arises to the company is not only a good view (image) by the community. When implementing the CSR concept, the company focuses on carrying out charity actions to the community so that it creates a good corporate image by the community and does not focus on the value that is generated profitably to the company. PKT has implemented CSV practice with the floating net cages (FNC) program. The KJA program carries out activities with the grouper and lobster cultivation program and PKT's business activity is in the field of fertilizers. FNC has provided a good view from the community for PKT but the FNC that is claimed by PKT as an FNC Program is not yet a concept of CSV. In practice, FNC is more appropriate to say CSR because it has not provided profit value for PKT.
Keywords: {'name': 'Public Image, Sustainable Development Goal, Shared Value'}
Authors & affiliations
Alan smith Purba
Affiliation not supplied
Eko Ganis Sukoharsono
Affiliation not supplied
Bambang Hariadi
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Anggraini, Fr dan Reni Retno. 2006. Pengungkapan Informasi Sosial dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pengungkapan Informasi Sosial dalam Laporan Keuangan Tahunan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan-Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Symposium National Accounting IX Padang.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brammal, S. (2014). CSR or social enterprise: which has more social impact? | Guardian sustainable business | The Guardian. Retrieved November 29, 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/social-enterprise-network/2014/mar/25/corporate-social-responsibility-better-social-business
DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
DOI: 10.1108/19355181311314789
DOI: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
Daood, A., & Menghwar, P. S. (2017, September). Understanding “Creating Shared Value”. In 10th Annual Conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business.
Dragan, ?., Dejan, ?., Sr?an, B., & Cariša, B. (2014). Socially responsible business and competitiveness in Serbia attitudes of students. ??????????? ?????????: ????????, ?????????, ???????????, (10).
DOI: 10.1177/2394964316628925
Jefkins, Frank. 2003. Public Relations. Edisi Kelima Direvisi Oleh Daniel Yadin. Penerbit Erlangga: Jakarta.
Ngoyo, M. F. (2018). Mengawal sustainable development goals (SDGs); meluruskan orientasi pembangunan yang berkeadilan. Sosioreligius, 1(1).
DOI: 10.4135/9781526460936
Lapi?a, I., Borkus, I., & Stari?eca, O. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and creating shared value: Case of Latvia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 6, 1605-1611.
Yulia Kusuma Wardani, Y. (2018). Implementasi Konsep Creating Shared Value (Csv) Sebagai Program Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) Dalam Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Stakeholder (Studi pada PT. Nestle Indonesia Panjang Factory). Pactum Law Journal, 1(03), 258-271.
DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2019.05.011
Elkington, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42.
DOI: 10.3390/su10114128
Kramer, M. R., & Pfitzer, M. W. (2016). The ecosystem of shared value. Harvard Business Review, 94(10), 80-89.
DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70177
DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-02-2014-0030
Rahayu, M. P. (2017). Respon Organisasional Terhadap Implementasi Remunerasi Berbasis Kinerja Dalam Perspektif Resource Dependence Theory Dan New Institutional Sociology (Studi Kasus Pada Badan Layanan Umum Poltekkes Kemenkes Malang) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Brawijaya).
Oktaviani, R. M. (2011). Fenomenologi implementasi corporate social responsibility sebagai realita strategi perusahaan: studi kasus pada PT APAC INTI CORPORA bawen semarang. Jurnal: dinamika keuangan dan perbankan, 3.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard business review, 80(12), 56-68.
Pradipta, D. H., & Purwaningsih, A. (2013). Pengaruh Luas Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perusahaan terhadap Earning Response Coefficient (ERC), dengan Ukuran Perusahaan dan Leverage Sebagai Variabel Kontrol. Universitas Atma Jaya.
Pupuk Kaltim, Sustainability Report (SR). (2018). Enhancing Value through Sustainable Innovation. The Indonesian fertiliser industry
Rixen, M., Böbel, I., Chailan, C., & Carlo, M. (2013). Creating Shared Value on a Global Scale: Possibilities for the United Nations’ Engagement. Journal of Competitiveness & Strategy, 3, 2-15.
DOI: 10.1177/146879410100100302
Chamidah, S., & Yulianti P, R. R. (2009). Kajian Kritis: Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) Dan Strategi Mencapai Keunggulan Kompetitif. Dinamika Ekonomi, 2(2).
Solihin, I. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility from Charity to Sustainability, Jakarta: PT. Riau Andalan Pulp and Paper.
DOI: 10.21776/ub.ijabs.2019.27.1.7
Sukoharsono, E. G. (2010). Metamorfosis Akuntansi Sosial dan Lingkungan: Mengkonstruksi Akuntansi Sustainabilitas Berdimensi Spiritualitas. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar FE Univ. Brawijaya.
Konsumen, S. O. P., & Pemasaran, K. (2001). cetakan I Penerbit PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Wibisono, Y. (2007). Membedah konsep & aplikasi CSR: corporate social responsibility. Fascho Pub.
DOI: 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.168
Yin, R. K. (2002). Studi kasus: desain dan metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.