CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

Commensality and responsive food consumption behavior in community based canteen

Dilayehu Desta Gebreyohannes ORCID ↗

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021 · Vol. 10 / Issue 2 · 54-71

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS0

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations0Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC

Mendeley · Readers—No verified count available

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

The present study aims to recognize the commensality phenomena and the role of empathy in emerging ethical food consumption behavior at a social level.  The study applied qualitative research using an ethnographic method to construct situational and emotional factors of commensality as food consumption behavior in the social meal context. Finding demonstrates that social context influence eating behavior of individual through empathy. It explores a segmented social practice concerning a different viewpoint of food consumption and preference. It is a more theoretical contribution to the sociology of food as a social practice. Additionally, we define responsive eating behavior in conjunction with belief matching.

Keywords: {'name': 'Commensality; Food Consumption; Behavior; Community Canteen'}

Authors & affiliations

Dilayehu Desta Gebreyohannes
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Almerico, G. M. (2014). Food and identity: Food studies, cultural, and personal identity. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies, 8(8). http://www.aabri.com/OC2014Manuscripts/OC14055.

DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.67.2.89.18614

DOI: 10.1109/LMWC.2009.2020041

DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.210

Batson, C.D. (2006). Not all self-interest after all: Economics of empathy-induced altruism. In D. De Cremer, M. Zeelenberg, & J. K. Murnighan (Eds), Social psychology and economics (pp. 281-299). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. eBook ISBN9780203726594

DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00001.x

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.004

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-05-2014-0214

Bohm, I. (2016). We're made of meat, so why should we eat vegetables? Food Discourses in the School Subject Home and Consumer Studies. OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-128176

Bohm, I. (2016). We're made of meat, so why should we eat vegetables? Food Discourses in the School Subject Home and Consumer Studies.

DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1hhfnq1.7

DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.024

DOI: 10.1509/jmr.14.0299

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-155

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01128.x

DOI: 10.4324/9781315085241

Dudovskiy, J., (2013). Consumer Buyer Behaviour Definition - Research Methodology. [online] Research Methodology. https://research-methodology.net/consumer-buyer-behaviour-definition

DOI: 10.1007/s40750-017-0061-4

Ehn, B., Löfgren, O., & Wilk, R. (2016). Exploring everyday life: strategies for ethnography and cultural analysis. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

DOI: 10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.534

DOI: 10.1006/appe.1996.0057

DOI: 10.1177/0094306115579191v

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.07.009

DOI: 10.1177/0539018411413963

DOI: 10.1037/a0026054

Fox, R. (2014), Food and eating: an anthropological perspective. Social Issues research centre. Ed. SIRC. SIRC, n.d. Web.

DOI: 10.1007/s10764-005-0729-7

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.004

DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.116

DOI: 10.2174/1568026043451573

DOI: 10.1007/s13668-020-00305-5

DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.042

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036206

DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.007

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2662835

DOI: 10.1177/1749975520922454

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.003

DOI: 10.1017/9781316597590

DOI: 10.1007/s12571-015-0455-8

DOI: 10.1186/s40337-017-0146-2

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031027

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031027

DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.10.005

DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1422697

DOI: 10.1080/10454446.2014.949995

DOI: 10.1155/2019/7237602

Lange, Jeffrey K. (2002). Review: Richard A. Krueger & Mary Anne Casey (2000). Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd Edition) [10 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(4), 28. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0204280.

DOI: 10.1007/s12160-009-9120-9

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00077.x

DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

DOI: 10.5539/ijps.v10n3p66

DOI: 10.1016/j.jef.2015.11.004

DOI: 10.1163/000579511X596624

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.006

Marriott, B. M. (2019). Social Facilitation and Inhibition of Eating. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Military Nutrition Research. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232442/

DOI: 10.17583/qre.2016.2120

DOI: 10.1007/BF00989645

DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.022

DOI: 10.2307/3211488

Neuman, W.L. (2011) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 7th Edition, Pearson, Boston.

DOI: 10.16995/ee.1075

DOI: 10.1186/2044-7248-2-24

Pollan, M., & Go Big Read. (2008). In defense of food: an eater's manifesto. In Open World Cat (Program).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.004

DOI: 10.2991/icse-15.2016.63

DOI: 10.1017/S0954422413000127

DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.03.001

DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00067

DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz155

DOI: 10.1590/1678-9865201932e180058

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030502

DOI: 10.1007/s00025-019-1062-3

DOI: 10.1177/019027250807100106

DOI: 10.1177/019027250807100106

DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1155161

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926

DOI: 10.1075/pbns.238.01sza

DOI: 10.1037/hea0000478

DOI: 10.3389/978-2-88945-518-8

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134676

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132140

Warde A. (2015). On the sociology of eating. Revue d'etudes en agriculture et environment – review of agricultural and environmental studies, Inra editions, pp.7 - 15. hal-01884914

DOI: 10.1177/1469540514547828

DOI: 10.1177/1178638819855936

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1404212111

DOI: 10.3898/NewF.74.05.2011

Yee. J (2010). Methodological innovation in practice-based design doctorates. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2), M15. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/196/193