Optimizing passenger experience: A technological preference analysis in Turkish Airports
Muhammad Humza · Umit Hacioglu ORCID ↗
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2023 · Vol. 5 / Issue 4 · 01-20
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:55 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:55 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Aviation-oriented companies are continuously seeking innovative approaches to enhance the passenger experience and operational efficiency within the industry. The objective of this study is to evaluate the categorization of passengers' technological preferences in Turkish airports. The objectives of this study are to enhance the understanding of Aviation Companies in Turkey regarding the technology preferences of passengers and their fundamental needs, as well as to analyze the characteristics of passengers that are directly linked to their technological choices. This study employs purposive sampling with a sample size of 455. Various statistical techniques, such as regression, correlation, and descriptive statistics, are employed to analyze the data. The findings indicate that biometric technology, personal device utilization, customisation and customization, as well as streaming and on-demand entertainment, greatly influence the technological preferences of travelers. Nevertheless, contactless solutions, inflight Wi-Fi, and mobile apps and digital services do not influence the technological preferences of travelers.
Keywords: {'name': 'Turkish Airports'}, {'name': 'Segmentation'}, {'name': 'Passenger Preferences'}, {'name': 'Aviation'}, {'name': 'Airports'}
Authors & affiliations
Muhammad Humza
Affiliation not supplied
Umit Hacioglu
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101484
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102638
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2017.02.001
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3226584
DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.06.002
DOI: 10.1145/3379336.3381456
Arkkelin, D. (2014). Using SPSS to understand research and data analysis.
DOI: 10.1108/APJML-07-2021-0486
DOI: 10.1177/0047287517700316
DOI: 10.1093/hebz/9780198869443.001.0001
Bilton, N. (2015). The Sorry State of In-Flight Wi-Fi. The New York Times, E2-L.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2016.09.003
DOI: 10.4324/9780203180990
DOI: 10.19168/jyasar.452297
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.047
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.07.003
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2003). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students.
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2016.03.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.05.005
DOI: 10.5937/gp21-16078
Florido-Benítez, L., & Del Alcázar, B. (2014, June). Analysis of mobile marketing in airports. In 7th World Conference for Graduate Research in Tourism, Hospitality and Leisure, Istanbul, Turkey (pp. 409-414).
Flouris, T. G., & Oswald, S. L. (2006). Designing and executing strategy in aviation management. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.169
DOI: 10.4324/9781003269359
DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100380
DOI: 10.1287/isre.1100.0312
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29739-8
Hacioglu, U. (Ed.). (2019b). Handbook of research on strategic fit and design in business ecosystems. IGI Global. https://doi.org/1010.4018/978-1-7998-1125-1
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72624-9
DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v1i1.105
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110853
Halpern, N., & Mwesiumo, D. (2018, July). Effect of Individual Service Components on Overal l Airport Experience. In 22nd Air Transport Research Societ y World Conference. Seoul, South Korea. July (pp. 2-5).
Halpern, N., Budd, T., Suau-Sanchez, P., Brathen, S., & Mwesiumo, D. (2019, July). Towards Airport 4.0: Airport digital maturity and transformation. In 23rd Air Transport Research Society World Conference.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.102005
DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2021.1984264
DOI: 10.3390/math11030583
DOI: 10.47738/ijiis.v4i1.80
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101917
IATA (2023) Iata.org. Available at: https://www.iata.org/contentassets/952a287130554b4880563edca1c8944f/iata-2019-gps-highlights.pdf (Accessed: 1 May 2023).
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.03.009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102122
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.04.002
Jiang, N. (2018). FlightFit An Application Enabling Air Travelers to Do Stretches Onboard. Rochester Institute of Technology.
DOI: 10.14687/jhs.v16i2.5661
Khalid, K., Abdullah, H. H., & Kumar M, D. (2012). Get along with quantitative research process. International Journal of Research in Management, 2(2), 15-29.
DOI: 10.30518/jav.1010982
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.08.014
DOI: 10.1007/s11151-022-09892-9
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.03.009
DOI: 10.1109/ICONAT57137.2023.10080120
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.07.017
Kuyucu, M. (2014, July). The Evaluation of Onboard Advertising as an Outdoor Advertising Media in Turkey. In International Interdisciplinary Business-Economics Advancement Conference (p. 503).
DOI: 10.1145/2933241
Lee, J., & Lehto, X. (2010). E-personalization and online privacy features: the case with travel websites. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 4, 1.
DOI: 10.1002/9781119183426
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G. C., & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Performing data analysis using IBM SPSS. John Wiley & Sons.
DOI: 10.4135/9781071872536
DOI: 10.1108/17579881211264477
DOI: 10.1177/0047287511418368
Muhumed, D. A. (2020). Determinant factors of passengers’ choice of airlines: A case study of international postgraduate students in Turkey (Master's thesis, ?bn Haldun Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü E?itim Enstitüsü).
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101720
DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100726
DOI: 10.1504/IJLSM.2012.045421
DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v3i1.246
DOI: 10.4324/9781003117407
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_58
DOI: 10.3390/su10114259
DOI: 10.1108/IHR-08-2020-0041
DOI: 10.3141/2214-02
DOI: 10.3141/2383-04
DOI: 10.1109/LDAV.2017.8231848
DOI: 10.1177/1468794114550439
Schawalder, J. (2014). The future of inflight entertainment in europe, according to passenger expectations: Why airlines should embrace consumer technology. Anchor Academic Publishing (aap_verlag).
DOI: 10.1177/1354816618806428
SITA. (2018). Air transport IT insights 2019. Geneva: SITA.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2019.04.005
Tipi, A. (2022). Airline passengers' perception of sustainability practices and business model of airlines: A study in the Turkish civil aviation market (Master's thesis).
DOI: 10.30585/jrems.v1i4.344
DOI: 10.1057/rpm.2010.41
DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2011.06.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101528
DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-11-2021-1435
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7068-6_14
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.10.003
DOI: 10.1111/itor.13154