A systematic review of perceived value toward online review on s-commerce platform
Nabhassorn Atchariyakarn · Jing Zhang
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021 · Vol. 10 / Issue 3 · 46-52
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Online reviews play a significant role in supporting consumers to make purchase decisions across provided platforms. Many studies examine the characteristics of online reviews and their impacts, nevertheless, only a few studies examine the perceived value from online reviews. This study provides the integration view by utilizing the systematic approach to synthesize 36 academic papers out of 661 searched papers between January 1st, 2011, and December 22nd, 2019. The contribution of researchers in studying the perceived value is increasing significantly and continuously since 2018. There are two main types of online reviews regardless of online platforms: Expert-written reviews and customer-written reviews. Perceived values can be derived from online review and be transmitted to online review simultaneously upon the content of studies. The framing of questions for a review focus on five key questions and to illustrate by providing the mind mapping of perceived value to reveal components and relationship among them. The finding emphasizes the research contents of existing research and research allocation, analysis of techniques used, theories, methodologies used, implications in different industrial sectors to enhance the understanding of this relevant information, ambiguous meanings, and development of areas that lack attention in the past decade. Besides, the indication of studies could identify the importance of perceived values that has a greater impact on consumers in the pre-stage of purchase decision.
Keywords: {'name': 'Perceived Value'}, {'name': 'Online Review'}, {'name': 'e-WOM'}, {'name': 'Social-Commerce'}, {'name': 'Systematic Review'}
Authors & affiliations
Nabhassorn Atchariyakarn
Affiliation not supplied
Jing Zhang
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.06.005
DOI: 10.4067/S0718-18762019000200102
Christin Susilowati, D.S., Perceived Value, eWord-of-Mouth, Traditional Word- of-Mouth, and Perceived Quality to Destination Image of Vacation Tourists. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 2018. 7(1): p. 312-321
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2018.06.012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.07.018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-77280-5_4
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.011
DOI: 10.12776/qip.v22i2.1062
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2018.05.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.reimke.2014.09.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2017.06.007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.010
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2017.02.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.026
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.11.002
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/11/002
DOI: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415170404
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.020
DOI: 10.1109/ICSSSM.2018.8465037
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4
DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2014.10.007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2018.04.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2018.01.004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
DOI: 10.1007/s10660-018-9310-2
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.015
.2017.08.015
DOI: 10.1186/s40493-015-0013-5