Examining the competitiveness of banking sector in Sri Lanka
Champika Liyanagamage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021 · Vol. 10 / Issue 3 · 320-327
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The banking sector in Sri Lanka has been portrayed by significant changes in the past few decades. It is widely perceived that competition in the Sri Lankan banking sector has improved since the introduction of the financial sector reforms in the 1990s. By applying Panzar-Rosse (PR) approach to test the degree of competitiveness, this paper assesses the validity of this claim in the context of the Sri Lankan banking sector during 1996-2018. The sample covers a broader set of bank-level panel data of the whole commercial banking sector which comprised of 25 licensed commercial banks. The EGLS procedure applied in this study revealed that during the stated period, the Sri Lankan banking sector had been moderately competitive. Further analysis also disclosed that there is no significant difference between the state-owned banks and private banks regarding their degree of competitiveness, as well as their temporal dynamics. Another striking observation revealed in this analysis is the lower level of competitiveness among foreign banks compared to the competitiveness of local banks. The Competitiveness of the Sri Lankan banking sector however is characterized by non-price competition, as on many occasions the interest rate depends on government policies. Hence, this study provides new insight into the nature of financial sector competitiveness in underdeveloped countries. The outcome of the research implies the necessity of attempts of all banks towards re-aligning their strategies to attract and retain customers. This would be the major challenge that banks face in accomplishing a higher level of competition in the banking industry in the future.
Keywords: {'name': 'bank competition, Panzar-Rosse approach, banking sector, state-owned banks, Sri Lanka'}
Authors & affiliations
Champika Liyanagamage
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Bikker, J. A., Spierdijk, L., & Finnie, P. (2006). Misspecification of the Panzar-Rosse Model: Assessing competition in the banking industry. DNB Working Papers 114, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department: http://notices-pdf. com/panzar-pdf. html.
Boone, J. (2000) Competition. Discussion Paper Series No. 2636, Centre for Economic Policy Research, United Kingdom.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02168.x
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(82)90121-5
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.874238
DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfp003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00610.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8411.1995.tb00103.x
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.11.023
DOI: 10.1007/PL00004091
DOI: 10.1007/s10693-012-0141-3
DOI: 10.5089/9781451862591.001
DOI: 10.2307/1991279
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(82)90122-7
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.09.004
DOI: 10.2307/1992568
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(94)90003-5
DOI: 10.1016/0148-6195(95)00047-X
DOI: 10.2307/135541
DOI: 10.2307/2098582
DOI: 10.1177/139156140700800205
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(89)90210-3
DOI: 10.2307/2077819
DOI: 10.2307/2978421
DOI: 10.1111/j.1354-7798.2006.00327.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1354-7798.2006.00327.x
DOI: 10.1080/00036840903493234
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1105385
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199706)18:6<439::AID-SMJ884>3.0.CO;2-Y