Blockchain technology as a panacea for procurement corruption in digital era
Oyebanjo Ogunlela ORCID ↗ · Ojugbele Olabode · Tengeh Robertson
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021 · Vol. 10 / Issue 4 · 311-320
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Corruption in public institutions is a significant problem that stifles economic, social and environmental development worldwide. This predominates when there is a lack of transparency, inadequate record-keeping, and low public accountability. Accordingly, the questions this paper intends to provide answers to are two-fold. Firstly, what are the recurring patterns of procurement corruption in the South Africa (SA) public sector? Secondly, how can digital technology deployment assist in checking this trend? The desktop method was adopted through literature examination of studies relating to corruption, procurement, blockchain and digitization. We conclude by proposing a model/framework for adopting and using blockchain technology in public institutions to minimise corruption and the time taken for contract document preparation and acceptance. This study contributed to knowledge by evaluating the issues associated with public procurement and how blockchain and digitization can be adopted to help stern the tide of corruption in public institutions.
Keywords: {'name': 'Public Procurement, Corruption, Digitization, Blockchain, South Africa'}
Authors & affiliations
Oyebanjo Ogunlela
Affiliation not supplied
Ojugbele Olabode
Affiliation not supplied
Tengeh Robertson
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Ababio, E., Vyas-Doorgapersad, S., & Mzini, L. (2008). Service delivery and under-expenditure: strategies towards effective control of public funds. Journal of Public Administration, 43(si-1), 3-15.
Accenture Labs (201)7. Blockchain for good: 4 guidelines for transforming social innovation organisations (www.accenture.com/ t20180102T200432Z__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/ PDF-68/Accenture-808045 BlockchainPOV-RGB. pdf#zoom=50)
DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2016.351
DOI: 10.4314/ldd.v22i1.4
Baranwal, P.R. 2(020). Blockchain Based Full Privacy Preserving Public Procurement, Research and Development, Talentica Software (India) Pvt Ltd, Pune. Pp. 1-15. https:// 10.1007/978-3-030-59638-5_1
Batran, A., Erben, A., Schulz, R., and Sperl, F., (2017). Procurement 4.0: A survival guide in a digital, disruptive world. Campus, Frankfurt.
DOI: 10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a1286
DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.003
DOI: 10.1111/jscm.12130
European Conference on Information Systems: Beyond Digitization – Facets of Socio-Technical Change, ECIS (2018), AIS Electronic Library, Portsmouth, pp. 1-17.
Fast, L., and Coppi, G. (2019), Feb. Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies in the Humanitarian Sector. Overseas Development Institute: https://www.odi.org/publications/11284-blockchain-and-distributed-ledger-technologies-humanitarian-sector.
Hardwick, F.S., Akram, R.N., and Markantonakis, K. (2016). Fair and Transparent Blockchain based Tendering Framework - A Step towards Open Governance, ISG-SCC, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, United Kingdom.
Härer, F. (2018). Decentralized business process modeling and instance tracking secured by a blockchain, in Bednar, P.M, Frank, U. and Kautz, K. (Eds), 26th
International, T. (2009). Global Corruption Barometer I. Secretariat.
International, T. (2020). What is corruption. International Secretariat. Retrieved 28th May from https://www.transparency.org/en/what-is-corruption
DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2014.935982
DOI: 10.26425/2658-3445-2019-1-33-41
Kumar, S. (2017). Blockchain: The solution to public sector corruption. November 2nd, 2017, Published in Articles: EE Publishers, Articles: PositionIT. https://www.ee.co.za/article/blockchain-solution-public-sector-corruption.html
DOI: 10.1386/jots.7.2.167_1
Mafunisa, K., & Nsingo, J. (Eds.). (2014). Safeguarding ethics and accountability in the public sector (2nd ed.). Jutan.
Mantzaris, E. (2014). Public procurement, tendering and corruption: Realities, challenges and tangible solutions.
Matlala, M., & Dintwe, S. (2013). Procurement fraud red flags in theSsouth African municipalities’ corporate governance. Conference Proceedings published by the South African Association of Public Administration and Management (SAAPAM),
Morabito, V. (2017). Business Innovation Through Blockchain, Springer International
Publishing, Cham.
DOI: 10.4102/jtscm.v10i1.197
Nakamoto, S., 31 October 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Tech. rep. pp. 1-11. Available: https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
Nelson, P. (2018). Primer on blockchain: how to assess the relevance of distributed ledger technology to international development (www.usaid.gov/ sites/default/files/documents/15396/USAID-Primer- Blockchain.pdf)
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61085-6_8
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, O. (2016)a. Public procurement for sustainable and inclusive growth: Enabling reform through evidence and peer reviews https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/Public-Procurement-for%20Sustainable-and-Inclusive-Growth_Brochure.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, O. (2016b). Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/Corruption-Public-Procurement-Brochure.pdf
Perera, S., Nanayakkara, S., Weerasuriya, T. (2021). Blockchain: The Next Stage of Digital
Procurement in Construction. Academia Letters, proof. Pp. (1-10).
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3040224
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3230013
Raycraft, R.D and Lannguist, A. (2020). How governments can leverage policy and blockchain technology to stunt public corruption- Report https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/governments-leverage-blockchain-public-procurement-corruption/
DOI: 10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a1359
DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2018.07.001
The Republic of South Africa National Treasury. (2015). Public Sector Supply Chain Management Review, Pretoria, 0002 Private Bag X115, Pretoria, 0001 40 Church Square, Pretoria, 0002 Private Bag X115, Pretoria, 0001.
Thornhill, C. (2012). Improving local government transformation in South Africa. Administratio Publica, 20(3), 128-143.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3458877
DOI: 10.1017/S002185530600026X
Williams, S., & Quinot, G. 2007. Public procurement and corruption: the South African response. South African Law Journal, 124(2), 339-363.
DOI: 10.1109/ICSA.2017.33
DOI: 10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.85