Artificial Intelligence for detecting and preventing procurement fraud
Chiji Longinus Ezeji ORCID ↗
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024 · Vol. 6 / Issue 1 · 63-73
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The utilization of powerful machine learning models in artificial intelligence offers novel prospects for the identification of fraudulent activities. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a revolutionary technological tool that enhances the ability to detect and prevent fraud by improving efficiency and effectiveness. This research offers a thorough examination of the utilization of artificial intelligence technology in the realm of procurement fraud prevention and detection. Additionally, it highlights the obstacles that arise when employing machine learning techniques for the purpose of identifying and preventing fraudulent activities. A mixed methods approach was employed in this study, wherein data was collected through an unstructured interview and questionnaire. We conducted a comprehensive review of relevant scholarly articles and online resources. The findings indicate that fraudsters are progressively advancing in their skills, which poses a significant challenge in detecting fraudulent activities. The advent of AI in fraud detection has demonstrated its transformative impact. AI has achieved unparalleled precision and velocity in crime detection and prevention, surpassing the capabilities of any human. Artificial intelligence (AI) enhances the capacity for automation. Accessing unstructured data in the form of spreadsheets, digital documents, and email inboxes poses a significant issue for the procurement function. In order to achieve a successful procurement transformation, businesses should prioritize the creation of essential tools, guarantee acceptance through the establishment of a superior user experience, and integrate both novel and pre-existing technology. It is imperative to disseminate knowledge to the general public regarding the escalating sophistication of artificial intelligence (AI) in the realm of fraud detection and prevention. This includes elucidating the potential benefits of AI in identifying patterns of suspicious activities, assessing its efficacy in predicting potential threats or fraudulent activities prior to their manifestation, and exploring its utility in analyzing historical data pertaining to both familiar and unfamiliar forms of fraudulent behavior.
Keywords: {'name': 'Artificial, Detection, Disruptive, Fraud, Intelligence, Prevention and Technolog'}
Authors & affiliations
Chiji Longinus Ezeji
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1002/hbe2.195
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-015-9333-z
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3738618
DOI: 10.1007/s10994-020-05877-5
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-75729-8_6
DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12294
Edwin, H., Sutherland and Donald, R., Cressey, Lippincott. (1978). Criminology. (Eds.), University of California: Santa Barbra.
Ernst, E & Young, Y. (2010). Driving Ethical Growth new markets, new challenges. 11th Global Fraud Survey. https://www.compliance building.com
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.030
Fraud Fighter. (2023) Procurement Fraud Statistic. Available: http://www.fraudfighters.net/news what-is-procurement-fraud. https://www.fraudfighters.net/news
DOI: 10.1109/ICDM.2018.00028
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J.H. Friedman. (2019). The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York: Springer.
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2798607
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.006
The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2016). Report to the Nations on Occupation Fraud and Abuse and Asset Misappropriation.2016, ACFE Report to the Nations Charts. Avaliable :https://www.acfeinsights.com/acfe-insights.
Wang Y., Wang L., Li Y., He D., Chen W., Liu T. Y. (2013). A Theoretical Analysis of NDCG Ranking Measures: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, 21(3), 321-342. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1304.6480.
DOI: 10.1145/3308560.3316586
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2017.11.001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00425.x
DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12292
Zheng, P., Yuan, S., Wu, X., Li, J., & Lu, A. (2019). One-class Adversarial Bonnets for Fraud Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 12 (86),12-93. https://www.paperdigest.org.
DOI: 10.1145/3366423.3380159
DOI: 10.1145/3366423.3380172